{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:WRLGJNKVR4LVBC7UDSN37AHRFY","short_pith_number":"pith:WRLGJNKV","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"b45664b5558f17508bf41c9bbf80f12e3b0ef2224793cadeaf830a3a55d1c7f5","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2603.05171","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Guidelines for the Annotation and Visualization of Legal Argumentation Structures in Chinese Judicial Decisions","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Kaixue Fei, Kun Chen, Xianglei Liao, Xinrui Li, Yi Xing","submitted_at":"2026-03-05T13:39:54Z","abstract_excerpt":"This Guideline presents a systematic and operationalizable annotation framework for representing legal argumentation structures in judicial decisions. Grounded in theories of legal reasoning and argumentation, the framework aims to reveal the logical organization of judicial reasoning and provide a reliable foundation for computational analysis. At the element level, the Guideline distinguishes between the non-propositional layer and the propositional layer. The non-propositional layer consists of two elements: Issue and Non-argumentative Component. At the propositional level, the Guideline de"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2603.05171","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2026-03-05T13:39:54Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"045a63198e8aa0f83571b4f1ce520e3b6109085935a927bad89f6f710e5c6b94","abstract_canon_sha256":"da945b496a8e7f84127f512b626c1b80be4d21ecea2e147bf0bc9032b763d7d7"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-06-19T16:10:36.266359Z","signature_b64":"fgB8wMlqbkMJpbESi36oczc2hABQT9D7u6iQC2ApGnXNDXtlwScaw+w1TbZWjjop9Hu3r9G/+oYdj/l7rHj5BQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"b45664b5558f17508bf41c9bbf80f12e3b0ef2224793cadeaf830a3a55d1c7f5","last_reissued_at":"2026-06-19T16:10:36.265852Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-06-19T16:10:36.265852Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Guidelines for the Annotation and Visualization of Legal Argumentation Structures in Chinese Judicial Decisions","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Kaixue Fei, Kun Chen, Xianglei Liao, Xinrui Li, Yi Xing","submitted_at":"2026-03-05T13:39:54Z","abstract_excerpt":"This Guideline presents a systematic and operationalizable annotation framework for representing legal argumentation structures in judicial decisions. Grounded in theories of legal reasoning and argumentation, the framework aims to reveal the logical organization of judicial reasoning and provide a reliable foundation for computational analysis. At the element level, the Guideline distinguishes between the non-propositional layer and the propositional layer. The non-propositional layer consists of two elements: Issue and Non-argumentative Component. At the propositional level, the Guideline de"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2603.05171","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2603.05171/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2603.05171","created_at":"2026-06-19T16:10:36.265910+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2603.05171v2","created_at":"2026-06-19T16:10:36.265910+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2603.05171","created_at":"2026-06-19T16:10:36.265910+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"WRLGJNKVR4LV","created_at":"2026-06-19T16:10:36.265910+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"WRLGJNKVR4LVBC7U","created_at":"2026-06-19T16:10:36.265910+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"WRLGJNKV","created_at":"2026-06-19T16:10:36.265910+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.02308","citing_title":"Structural Dilemmas and Developmental Pathways of Legal Argument Mining in the Era of Artificial Intelligence","ref_index":54,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/WRLGJNKVR4LVBC7UDSN37AHRFY","json":"https://pith.science/pith/WRLGJNKVR4LVBC7UDSN37AHRFY.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WRLGJNKVR4LVBC7UDSN37AHRFY/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WRLGJNKVR4LVBC7UDSN37AHRFY/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/WRLGJNKV"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/WRLGJNKVR4LVBC7UDSN37AHRFY","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/WRLGJNKVR4LVBC7UDSN37AHRFY.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/WRLGJNKV","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2603.05171&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WRLGJNKVR4LVBC7UDSN37AHRFY/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/WRLGJNKVR4LVBC7UDSN37AHRFY/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/WRLGJNKVR4LVBC7UDSN37AHRFY/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/WRLGJNKVR4LVBC7UDSN37AHRFY/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/WRLGJNKVR4LVBC7UDSN37AHRFY/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/WRLGJNKVR4LVBC7UDSN37AHRFY/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/WRLGJNKVR4LVBC7UDSN37AHRFY/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-06-19T16:10:36.265910+00:00","updated_at":"2026-06-19T16:10:36.265910+00:00"}