{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:XBRNKIUHEK2OQYRDSN45IJA7BF","short_pith_number":"pith:XBRNKIUH","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"b862d5228722b4e862239379d4241f097c1e499187833a3f265907c1b4af120e","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2311.09277","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Contrastive Chain-of-Thought Prompting","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Guizhen Chen, Lidong Bing, Luu Anh Tuan, Soujanya Poria, Yew Ken Chia","submitted_at":"2023-11-15T18:54:01Z","abstract_excerpt":"Despite the success of chain of thought in enhancing language model reasoning, the underlying process remains less well understood. Although logically sound reasoning appears inherently crucial for chain of thought, prior studies surprisingly reveal minimal impact when using invalid demonstrations instead. Furthermore, the conventional chain of thought does not inform language models on what mistakes to avoid, which potentially leads to more errors. Hence, inspired by how humans can learn from both positive and negative examples, we propose contrastive chain of thought to enhance language mode"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2311.09277","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2023-11-15T18:54:01Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"93593ced08732b9d788d4e4f6cea99fd2de79f0ea8870d473c470472e01134a2","abstract_canon_sha256":"52abdbde72b6074ab1606924cde51d0cf25806738ab8650b90d829410931b08b"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T07:13:12.451232Z","signature_b64":"lgt0lDKYndmu4CpeBEhdoI2EyUcUzeJf44ksPVIP2hYyOzUXa+RafR5oQBwDplYw0hfHPRSPLLsIt/9uDCQICQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"b862d5228722b4e862239379d4241f097c1e499187833a3f265907c1b4af120e","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T07:13:12.450710Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T07:13:12.450710Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Contrastive Chain-of-Thought Prompting","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Guizhen Chen, Lidong Bing, Luu Anh Tuan, Soujanya Poria, Yew Ken Chia","submitted_at":"2023-11-15T18:54:01Z","abstract_excerpt":"Despite the success of chain of thought in enhancing language model reasoning, the underlying process remains less well understood. Although logically sound reasoning appears inherently crucial for chain of thought, prior studies surprisingly reveal minimal impact when using invalid demonstrations instead. Furthermore, the conventional chain of thought does not inform language models on what mistakes to avoid, which potentially leads to more errors. Hence, inspired by how humans can learn from both positive and negative examples, we propose contrastive chain of thought to enhance language mode"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2311.09277","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2311.09277/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2311.09277","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:13:12.450784+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2311.09277v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:13:12.450784+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2311.09277","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:13:12.450784+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"XBRNKIUHEK2O","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:13:12.450784+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"XBRNKIUHEK2OQYRD","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:13:12.450784+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"XBRNKIUH","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:13:12.450784+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":9,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.23293","citing_title":"Partial exploiters sustain cooperation: the hump-shaped strategy stably coexists with unconditional cooperators","ref_index":5,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.01511","citing_title":"Revisiting Chain-of-Thought Reasoning under Limited Supervision: Semi-supervised Chain-of-Thought Learning","ref_index":4,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.11164","citing_title":"ReasonAlloc: Hierarchical Decoding-Time KV Cache Budget Allocation for Reasoning Models","ref_index":17,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.08068","citing_title":"DICE: Entropy-Regularized Equilibrium Selection for Stable Multi-Agent LLM Coordination","ref_index":54,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.00043","citing_title":"A Taxonomy of Single-Turn Textual Prompt Patterns","ref_index":19,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2402.07927","citing_title":"A Systematic Survey of Prompt Engineering in Large Language Models: Techniques and Applications","ref_index":4,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.23270","citing_title":"CAP-CoT: Cycle Adversarial Prompt for Improving Chain of Thoughts in LLM Reasoning","ref_index":5,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2403.07974","citing_title":"LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code","ref_index":189,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.17800","citing_title":"ReFineVLA: Multimodal Reasoning-Aware Generalist Robotic Policies via Teacher-Guided Fine-Tuning","ref_index":5,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/XBRNKIUHEK2OQYRDSN45IJA7BF","json":"https://pith.science/pith/XBRNKIUHEK2OQYRDSN45IJA7BF.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XBRNKIUHEK2OQYRDSN45IJA7BF/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XBRNKIUHEK2OQYRDSN45IJA7BF/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/XBRNKIUH"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/XBRNKIUHEK2OQYRDSN45IJA7BF","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/XBRNKIUHEK2OQYRDSN45IJA7BF.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/XBRNKIUH","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2311.09277&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XBRNKIUHEK2OQYRDSN45IJA7BF/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XBRNKIUHEK2OQYRDSN45IJA7BF/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/XBRNKIUHEK2OQYRDSN45IJA7BF/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/XBRNKIUHEK2OQYRDSN45IJA7BF/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/XBRNKIUHEK2OQYRDSN45IJA7BF/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/XBRNKIUHEK2OQYRDSN45IJA7BF/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/XBRNKIUHEK2OQYRDSN45IJA7BF/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T07:13:12.450784+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T07:13:12.450784+00:00"}