{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2016:XI5HOPXNDZIBF3Z5Y5ZFIWCEZT","short_pith_number":"pith:XI5HOPXN","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"ba3a773eed1e5012ef3dc772545844ccf8bb7f6dce8b949f584bcd97ad246717","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1604.06463","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Quantifying Tensions between CMB and Distance Datasets in Models with Free Curvature or Lensing Amplitude","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","authors_text":"A. Saro (LMU), D. Rapetti (LMU), J. J. Mohr (LMU/MPE), J. P. Dietrich (LMU), S. Grandis (LMU)","submitted_at":"2016-04-21T20:00:05Z","abstract_excerpt":"Recent measurements of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) by the Planck Collaboration have produced arguably the most powerful observational evidence in support of the standard model of cosmology, i.e. the spatially flat $\\Lambda$CDM paradigm. In this work, we perform model selection tests to examine whether the base CMB temperature and large scale polarization anisotropy data from Planck 2015 (P15) prefer any of eight commonly used one-parameter model extensions with respect to flat $\\Lambda$CDM. We find a clear preference for models with free curvature, $\\Omega_\\mathrm{K}$, or free amplit"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1604.06463","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","submitted_at":"2016-04-21T20:00:05Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"24a65ffd69fe33fcc718c6d96b3c97919630cde42fefaf3d435ffe9e72172f82","abstract_canon_sha256":"c244c450dbfb7e759e04096125a4184ad8a13d97b4f6d57adff7b8b29b9512ea"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T01:02:59.031233Z","signature_b64":"ATxt+vZFLVGBBs/U4ww+eKiDSJvrZs3UldqklUaffF6ZNlVL5ZvMdxbUnbPd+Lmt7epVnugoIu+yfgcIdVwZBg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"ba3a773eed1e5012ef3dc772545844ccf8bb7f6dce8b949f584bcd97ad246717","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T01:02:59.030740Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T01:02:59.030740Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Quantifying Tensions between CMB and Distance Datasets in Models with Free Curvature or Lensing Amplitude","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","authors_text":"A. Saro (LMU), D. Rapetti (LMU), J. J. Mohr (LMU/MPE), J. P. Dietrich (LMU), S. Grandis (LMU)","submitted_at":"2016-04-21T20:00:05Z","abstract_excerpt":"Recent measurements of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) by the Planck Collaboration have produced arguably the most powerful observational evidence in support of the standard model of cosmology, i.e. the spatially flat $\\Lambda$CDM paradigm. In this work, we perform model selection tests to examine whether the base CMB temperature and large scale polarization anisotropy data from Planck 2015 (P15) prefer any of eight commonly used one-parameter model extensions with respect to flat $\\Lambda$CDM. We find a clear preference for models with free curvature, $\\Omega_\\mathrm{K}$, or free amplit"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1604.06463","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1604.06463","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:02:59.030822+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1604.06463v2","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:02:59.030822+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1604.06463","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:02:59.030822+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"XI5HOPXNDZIB","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:51.357362+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"XI5HOPXNDZIBF3Z5","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:51.357362+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"XI5HOPXN","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:51.357362+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":3,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2503.14743","citing_title":"Extended Dark Energy analysis using DESI DR2 BAO measurements","ref_index":184,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2404.03002","citing_title":"DESI 2024 VI: Cosmological Constraints from the Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations","ref_index":221,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2503.14738","citing_title":"DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints","ref_index":147,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/XI5HOPXNDZIBF3Z5Y5ZFIWCEZT","json":"https://pith.science/pith/XI5HOPXNDZIBF3Z5Y5ZFIWCEZT.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XI5HOPXNDZIBF3Z5Y5ZFIWCEZT/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XI5HOPXNDZIBF3Z5Y5ZFIWCEZT/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/XI5HOPXN"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/XI5HOPXNDZIBF3Z5Y5ZFIWCEZT","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/XI5HOPXNDZIBF3Z5Y5ZFIWCEZT.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/XI5HOPXN","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1604.06463&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XI5HOPXNDZIBF3Z5Y5ZFIWCEZT/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XI5HOPXNDZIBF3Z5Y5ZFIWCEZT/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/XI5HOPXNDZIBF3Z5Y5ZFIWCEZT/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/XI5HOPXNDZIBF3Z5Y5ZFIWCEZT/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/XI5HOPXNDZIBF3Z5Y5ZFIWCEZT/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/XI5HOPXNDZIBF3Z5Y5ZFIWCEZT/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/XI5HOPXNDZIBF3Z5Y5ZFIWCEZT/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T01:02:59.030822+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T01:02:59.030822+00:00"}