{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2016:XV7FTOJVJ2HYF6JV2RM4YACSJS","short_pith_number":"pith:XV7FTOJV","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"bd7e59b9354e8f82f935d459cc00524c8d242fdecffc74416539866721ae1acf","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1608.07191","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"A new $G$-parity violating amplitude in the $J/\\psi$ decay?","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"A. Calcaterra, A. Zallo, C. M. Carloni Calame, D. Bettoni, E. Fioravanti, F. Bianchi, F. De Mori, F. Piccinini, G. Cibinetto, G. Felici, G. Mezzadri, G. Montagna, I. Garzia, L. Yan, M. Bertani, M. Destefanis, M. Greco, M. Maggiora, M. Savri\\'e, O. Nicrosini, P. Patteri, R. Baldini Ferroli, R. Farinelli, S. Marcello, S. Pacetti, S. Spataro, V. Santoro, Y. D. Wang","submitted_at":"2016-08-25T15:14:10Z","abstract_excerpt":"The $J/\\psi$ meson has negative $G$-parity so that, in the limit of isospin conservation, its decay into $\\pi^+\\pi^-$ should be purely electromagnetic. However, the measured branching fraction $\\mathcal{B}(J/\\psi\\to\\pi^+\\pi^-)$ exceeds by more than 3.9 standard deviations the expectation computed according to BaBar data on the $e^+e^-\\to\\pi^+\\pi^-$ cross section. The possibility that the two-gluon plus one-photon decay mechanism is not suppressed by $G$-parity conservation is discussed, even by considering other multi-pion decay channels. As also obtained by phenomenological computation, such "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1608.07191","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2016-08-25T15:14:10Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"8a32621183dfea97bc2af8d23690de75831d034c7f6d3cd5684cbca1d6f2566e","abstract_canon_sha256":"a3d819865dd791fc2f12d081902c31197bfafb6fa4afc5536530f2dcc2e696a5"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T00:49:15.993816Z","signature_b64":"fxdWPwypGQk6KAakTDDY7zVKu9Y+917J4MWBQ7t6WX5E3QeIcOF4TW6JjSeyyInbrHMlXJNz3pq9OR8zytIkCA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"bd7e59b9354e8f82f935d459cc00524c8d242fdecffc74416539866721ae1acf","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T00:49:15.993239Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T00:49:15.993239Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"A new $G$-parity violating amplitude in the $J/\\psi$ decay?","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"A. Calcaterra, A. Zallo, C. M. Carloni Calame, D. Bettoni, E. Fioravanti, F. Bianchi, F. De Mori, F. Piccinini, G. Cibinetto, G. Felici, G. Mezzadri, G. Montagna, I. Garzia, L. Yan, M. Bertani, M. Destefanis, M. Greco, M. Maggiora, M. Savri\\'e, O. Nicrosini, P. Patteri, R. Baldini Ferroli, R. Farinelli, S. Marcello, S. Pacetti, S. Spataro, V. Santoro, Y. D. Wang","submitted_at":"2016-08-25T15:14:10Z","abstract_excerpt":"The $J/\\psi$ meson has negative $G$-parity so that, in the limit of isospin conservation, its decay into $\\pi^+\\pi^-$ should be purely electromagnetic. However, the measured branching fraction $\\mathcal{B}(J/\\psi\\to\\pi^+\\pi^-)$ exceeds by more than 3.9 standard deviations the expectation computed according to BaBar data on the $e^+e^-\\to\\pi^+\\pi^-$ cross section. The possibility that the two-gluon plus one-photon decay mechanism is not suppressed by $G$-parity conservation is discussed, even by considering other multi-pion decay channels. As also obtained by phenomenological computation, such "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1608.07191","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1608.07191","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:49:15.993326+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1608.07191v2","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:49:15.993326+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1608.07191","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:49:15.993326+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"XV7FTOJVJ2HY","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:51.357362+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"XV7FTOJVJ2HYF6JV","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:51.357362+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"XV7FTOJV","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:51.357362+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/XV7FTOJVJ2HYF6JV2RM4YACSJS","json":"https://pith.science/pith/XV7FTOJVJ2HYF6JV2RM4YACSJS.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XV7FTOJVJ2HYF6JV2RM4YACSJS/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XV7FTOJVJ2HYF6JV2RM4YACSJS/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/XV7FTOJV"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/XV7FTOJVJ2HYF6JV2RM4YACSJS","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/XV7FTOJVJ2HYF6JV2RM4YACSJS.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/XV7FTOJV","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1608.07191&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XV7FTOJVJ2HYF6JV2RM4YACSJS/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/XV7FTOJVJ2HYF6JV2RM4YACSJS/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/XV7FTOJVJ2HYF6JV2RM4YACSJS/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/XV7FTOJVJ2HYF6JV2RM4YACSJS/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/XV7FTOJVJ2HYF6JV2RM4YACSJS/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/XV7FTOJVJ2HYF6JV2RM4YACSJS/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/XV7FTOJVJ2HYF6JV2RM4YACSJS/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T00:49:15.993326+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T00:49:15.993326+00:00"}