{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:ZDGVEDFPWPYYZHDE6HLUPCCTFJ","short_pith_number":"pith:ZDGVEDFP","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"c8cd520cafb3f18c9c64f1d74788532a7901c42f192184b10e28b39e48c95d11","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2605.29589","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Bell's theorem: why probability factorisation fails","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Geoff Beck","submitted_at":"2026-05-28T08:33:35Z","abstract_excerpt":"The empirical proof of Bell inequality violations was a landmark moment for research into quantum foundations. It commits us to a universe without strict relativistic locality or requires that we escape through a potential loophole like many-worlds or superdeterminism. In this work, we consider a sequential, single-spin experiment whose auto-correlations match the two-spin entangled correlations of a Bell scenario. We use a counterfactual equivalence between the two to argue that Bell-type correlations are actually just a different implementation of the sequential experiment. This comports wel"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2605.29589","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2026-05-28T08:33:35Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"930f22228530bbc155bdba79694ea0113c96db49983e44f7b0ebef4cd90a40ae","abstract_canon_sha256":"cdfa4c7e04748fec2fb4901b3cbca3eb56ac18e41fc09267e5c689d56a1d173d"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-29T01:05:49.311154Z","signature_b64":"PVQ9rYgz94Z3kYaAU8IPmyvzmoAR+ko46MhfFwq2U631PCBMhxd6zyS6q6Ph8vHkCb2RXnX5BdWIjIoh9DkPAA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"c8cd520cafb3f18c9c64f1d74788532a7901c42f192184b10e28b39e48c95d11","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-29T01:05:49.310306Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-29T01:05:49.310306Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Bell's theorem: why probability factorisation fails","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Geoff Beck","submitted_at":"2026-05-28T08:33:35Z","abstract_excerpt":"The empirical proof of Bell inequality violations was a landmark moment for research into quantum foundations. It commits us to a universe without strict relativistic locality or requires that we escape through a potential loophole like many-worlds or superdeterminism. In this work, we consider a sequential, single-spin experiment whose auto-correlations match the two-spin entangled correlations of a Bell scenario. We use a counterfactual equivalence between the two to argue that Bell-type correlations are actually just a different implementation of the sequential experiment. This comports wel"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2605.29589","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2605.29589/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2605.29589","created_at":"2026-05-29T01:05:49.310453+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2605.29589v1","created_at":"2026-05-29T01:05:49.310453+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2605.29589","created_at":"2026-05-29T01:05:49.310453+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"ZDGVEDFPWPYY","created_at":"2026-05-29T01:05:49.310453+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"ZDGVEDFPWPYYZHDE","created_at":"2026-05-29T01:05:49.310453+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"ZDGVEDFP","created_at":"2026-05-29T01:05:49.310453+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/ZDGVEDFPWPYYZHDE6HLUPCCTFJ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/ZDGVEDFPWPYYZHDE6HLUPCCTFJ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZDGVEDFPWPYYZHDE6HLUPCCTFJ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZDGVEDFPWPYYZHDE6HLUPCCTFJ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ZDGVEDFP"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/ZDGVEDFPWPYYZHDE6HLUPCCTFJ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/ZDGVEDFPWPYYZHDE6HLUPCCTFJ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ZDGVEDFP","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2605.29589&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZDGVEDFPWPYYZHDE6HLUPCCTFJ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZDGVEDFPWPYYZHDE6HLUPCCTFJ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/ZDGVEDFPWPYYZHDE6HLUPCCTFJ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/ZDGVEDFPWPYYZHDE6HLUPCCTFJ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/ZDGVEDFPWPYYZHDE6HLUPCCTFJ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/ZDGVEDFPWPYYZHDE6HLUPCCTFJ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/ZDGVEDFPWPYYZHDE6HLUPCCTFJ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-29T01:05:49.310453+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-29T01:05:49.310453+00:00"}