{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2021:ZDQBZG6YSDZP4WCTIL7QRE3AK5","short_pith_number":"pith:ZDQBZG6Y","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"c8e01c9bd890f2fe585342ff0893605774093185d3f0f08e3e9e40b265265095","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2107.00281","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Scientia Potentia Est -- On the Role of Knowledge in Computational Argumentation","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Anne Lauscher, Goran Glava\\v{s}, Henning Wachsmuth, Iryna Gurevych","submitted_at":"2021-07-01T08:12:41Z","abstract_excerpt":"Despite extensive research efforts in recent years, computational argumentation (CA) remains one of the most challenging areas of natural language processing. The reason for this is the inherent complexity of the cognitive processes behind human argumentation, which integrate a plethora of different types of knowledge, ranging from topic-specific facts and common sense to rhetorical knowledge. The integration of knowledge from such a wide range in CA requires modeling capabilities far beyond many other natural language understanding tasks. Existing research on mining, assessing, reasoning over"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2107.00281","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2021-07-01T08:12:41Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"12aefe15fec17166abf79a981b04c05d97d070305f6cf148fd2f3b1b93001283","abstract_canon_sha256":"d390706ec5ec35a0a1b12bcb6bdf664099c5ad09c7f30404f5bd8b6ac3a6d093"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T05:14:08.541193Z","signature_b64":"/pVimih86VaWMTptqFsqeGGuGvIJHEwyMsZ6QXE993dJkkI5x3a1pFc2CYfklFrQ1BjkSe0RVKzNJMfN4klKDw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"c8e01c9bd890f2fe585342ff0893605774093185d3f0f08e3e9e40b265265095","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T05:14:08.540795Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T05:14:08.540795Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Scientia Potentia Est -- On the Role of Knowledge in Computational Argumentation","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Anne Lauscher, Goran Glava\\v{s}, Henning Wachsmuth, Iryna Gurevych","submitted_at":"2021-07-01T08:12:41Z","abstract_excerpt":"Despite extensive research efforts in recent years, computational argumentation (CA) remains one of the most challenging areas of natural language processing. The reason for this is the inherent complexity of the cognitive processes behind human argumentation, which integrate a plethora of different types of knowledge, ranging from topic-specific facts and common sense to rhetorical knowledge. The integration of knowledge from such a wide range in CA requires modeling capabilities far beyond many other natural language understanding tasks. Existing research on mining, assessing, reasoning over"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2107.00281","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2107.00281/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2107.00281","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:14:08.540850+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2107.00281v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:14:08.540850+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2107.00281","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:14:08.540850+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"ZDQBZG6YSDZP","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:14:08.540850+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"ZDQBZG6YSDZP4WCT","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:14:08.540850+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"ZDQBZG6Y","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:14:08.540850+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/ZDQBZG6YSDZP4WCTIL7QRE3AK5","json":"https://pith.science/pith/ZDQBZG6YSDZP4WCTIL7QRE3AK5.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZDQBZG6YSDZP4WCTIL7QRE3AK5/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZDQBZG6YSDZP4WCTIL7QRE3AK5/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ZDQBZG6Y"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/ZDQBZG6YSDZP4WCTIL7QRE3AK5","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/ZDQBZG6YSDZP4WCTIL7QRE3AK5.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ZDQBZG6Y","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2107.00281&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZDQBZG6YSDZP4WCTIL7QRE3AK5/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ZDQBZG6YSDZP4WCTIL7QRE3AK5/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/ZDQBZG6YSDZP4WCTIL7QRE3AK5/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/ZDQBZG6YSDZP4WCTIL7QRE3AK5/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/ZDQBZG6YSDZP4WCTIL7QRE3AK5/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/ZDQBZG6YSDZP4WCTIL7QRE3AK5/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/ZDQBZG6YSDZP4WCTIL7QRE3AK5/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T05:14:08.540850+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T05:14:08.540850+00:00"}