pith. sign in

arxiv: 2508.00798 · v2 · submitted 2025-08-01 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · gr-qc· hep-ph

Gravitational waves from axion inflation in the gradient expansion formalism. Part I. Pure axion inflation

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 01:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-ph
keywords axion inflationgravitational wavesgradient expansion formalismbackreactionstochastic backgrounddark radiationgauge fields
0
0 comments X

The pith

In pure axion inflation, detectable gravitational wave signals appear only in regimes of strong backreaction that violate dark radiation limits.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines gravitational wave production in single-field axion inflation coupled to Abelian gauge fields. It applies the gradient expansion formalism to perform a detailed parameter scan near the onset of strong backreaction, modeling the axion potential as quadratic near its minimum. The central result is that gravitational wave amplitudes large enough for future interferometers occur exclusively in regions where backreaction becomes strong. These same regions exceed the observational upper bound on the effective number of relativistic degrees of freedom. The work therefore supplies concrete benchmark targets for future lattice simulations to test or improve the gradient-expansion predictions.

Core claim

Using the gradient expansion formalism on pure axion inflation with a quadratic potential near its minimum, the authors show that the stochastic gravitational-wave background sourced by gauge-field production reaches amplitudes accessible to future detectors only in parameter regions that also produce strong backreaction and exceed the allowed energy density of dark radiation.

What carries the argument

The gradient expansion formalism, a numerical technique that evolves the nonlinear dynamics of the gauge fields in the limit of vanishing axion gradients.

If this is right

  • Observable gravitational-wave signals require strong backreaction on the axion condensate.
  • The same parameter choices exceed the current upper limit on extra relativistic energy density.
  • The gradient-expansion results supply precise targets for full lattice simulations of axion inflation.
  • Any future detection of a stochastic background from axion inflation would imply additional dark radiation beyond standard-model expectations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If lattice studies confirm the backreaction threshold, many simple axion-inflation models may be ruled out as sources of detectable primordial gravitational waves.
  • The tension with ΔN_eff could be relaxed by extending the model to non-Abelian gauge sectors or by allowing larger axion gradients.
  • Similar gradient-expansion scans could be applied to other single-field models that source gauge fields, testing whether the backreaction conflict is generic.

Load-bearing premise

The gradient expansion formalism remains accurate when axion gradients vanish and a quadratic approximation to the axion potential holds near its minimum.

What would settle it

A lattice simulation of the same axion inflation model that produces observable gravitational waves while remaining below the ΔN_eff bound and without strong backreaction would falsify the claim.

read the original abstract

Axion inflation is a well-motivated model of cosmic inflation with a rich phenomenology. The abundant production of gauge fields during axion inflation notably sources a stochastic gravitational-wave (GW) background signal, which nourishes the hope that future GW searches might have a chance to probe the model. In this paper, we scrutinize GW production during axion inflation in the gradient expansion formalism (GEF), a powerful numerical technique that captures the nonlinear dynamics of the system in the limit of vanishing axion gradients. We focus on {single-field} axion inflation coupled to a pure Abelian gauge sector, i.e., pure axion inflation (PAI), and perform the first-ever {detailed} parameter scan of GW production in the Abelian PAI model close to the onset of strong backreaction. {We approximate the axion potential around its minimum by a quadratic mass term and study the tensor modes that exit the Hubble horizon as the axion rolls down this potential.} Remarkably enough, we find that GW signals within the reach of future GW interferometers can only be realized in parameter regions that also lead to strong backreaction and that are in conflict with the upper limit on $\Delta N_{\rm eff}$, i.e., the allowed energy density of dark radiation. This observation defines a clear target for future lattice studies of axion inflation that may confirm or improve the predictions of our GEF benchmark.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper performs a detailed numerical parameter scan of stochastic gravitational wave production in single-field pure axion inflation (PAI) coupled to an Abelian gauge sector, using the gradient expansion formalism (GEF) under the assumption of vanishing axion gradients. The axion potential is approximated by a quadratic mass term near its minimum, and the scan focuses on tensor modes exiting the Hubble horizon as the axion rolls down this potential, near the onset of strong backreaction. The central result is that GW signals potentially reachable by future interferometers appear only in parameter regions that also produce strong backreaction and violate the observational upper limit on ΔN_eff.

Significance. If the results hold, the work identifies a clear tension between detectable GW backgrounds and cosmological constraints on dark radiation in the Abelian PAI model, while supplying a useful GEF benchmark for future lattice simulations. The first detailed scan of GW production close to the onset of strong backreaction constitutes a concrete strength of the manuscript.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and model setup] Abstract and model setup: The central claim—that detectable GW signals require strong backreaction in conflict with the ΔN_eff bound—rests on GEF results obtained in the vanishing axion-gradient limit. Strong gauge-field production sources axion inhomogeneities via the Chern-Simons coupling in the axion equation of motion; once spatial gradients become appreciable, the GEF truncation (which assumes axion homogeneity) ceases to be self-consistent. The numerical scan is performed precisely near the onset of strong backreaction, the regime where this sourcing effect is expected to be largest, so the reported tension could be an artifact of the approximation.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Numerical scan section] Numerical scan section: Additional details on convergence tests, error bars on the reported GW spectra and energy densities, and the precise implementation of the parameter scan would strengthen the quantitative comparison to ΔN_eff limits.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for identifying an important point regarding the regime of validity of the gradient expansion formalism. We address the major comment below and propose a targeted revision to strengthen the discussion of approximations.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: The central claim—that detectable GW signals require strong backreaction in conflict with the ΔN_eff bound—rests on GEF results obtained in the vanishing axion-gradient limit. Strong gauge-field production sources axion inhomogeneities via the Chern-Simons coupling in the axion equation of motion; once spatial gradients become appreciable, the GEF truncation (which assumes axion homogeneity) ceases to be self-consistent. The numerical scan is performed precisely near the onset of strong backreaction, the regime where this sourcing effect is expected to be largest, so the reported tension could be an artifact of the approximation.

    Authors: We agree that gauge-field production can source axion inhomogeneities through the Chern-Simons term and that the GEF assumes vanishing axion gradients by construction. Our parameter scan is performed in the regime approaching the onset of strong backreaction, where this sourcing is indeed expected to become relevant. Within the GEF, we monitor the magnitude of gradient terms and restrict the scan to values where they remain perturbatively small, consistent with the truncation. Nevertheless, we acknowledge that a quantitative assessment of when gradients grow to invalidate the approximation requires a treatment beyond the current homogeneous-axion setup. We will revise the manuscript to expand the discussion in the model-setup and conclusions sections, explicitly noting this limitation and reiterating that the GEF results constitute a controlled benchmark for future lattice simulations capable of capturing axion inhomogeneities. This does not alter the central finding within the stated approximations but clarifies the scope of the claimed tension. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; numerical GEF results compared to external bounds

full rationale

The paper's main claim follows from direct numerical evolution of the axion-gauge system under the gradient expansion formalism (with quadratic potential approximation), followed by comparison of computed GW spectra and energy densities against independent external constraints on ΔN_eff. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or self-citation chain; the derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the numerical results obtained under the gradient expansion approximation and the quadratic potential truncation, together with external observational bounds on ΔN_eff. The scanned axion-gauge coupling is the primary free parameter; standard cosmological assumptions supply the background framework.

free parameters (1)
  • axion-gauge coupling strength
    Scanned across values to locate the onset of strong backreaction and associated GW production.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker background and slow-roll inflation dynamics.
    Provides the cosmological setting in which the axion rolls and tensor modes exit the horizon.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5796 in / 1369 out tokens · 27506 ms · 2026-05-19T01:20:03.620304+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Axion Inflation from Heavy-Fermion One-Loop Effects

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    One-loop integration of a heavy fermion with inflaton-dependent mass in axion inflation generates localized gauge-field production and a detectable chiral gravitational-wave signal in the deci-hertz range.

  2. A universal scaling law for gravitational waves induced during inflation

    astro-ph.CO 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Induced gravitational waves during inflation obey a universal tensor spectral index formula that yields near scale-invariance for slow-roll expansion regardless of the source field's original spectrum.

  3. Gravitational waves from axion inflation in the gradient expansion formalism. Part II. Fermionic axion inflation

    astro-ph.CO 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Schwinger fermion production in axion inflation damps gauge fields, enabling observable primordial gravitational waves in LISA/ET bands while satisfying ΔN_eff limits and identifying a new damped-oscillation backreact...

  4. Primordial black hole dark matter from axion inflation

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    PBHs generated by axion inflation with gauge-field coupling can comprise all dark matter in the asteroidal mass range while producing a LISA-measurable stochastic GW background.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

115 extracted references · 115 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers · 45 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo collaboration, Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger , Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 061102 [ 1602.03837]

  2. [2]

    Einstein, N¨ aherungsweise Integration der Feldgleichungen der Gravitation, Sitzungsber

    A. Einstein, N¨ aherungsweise Integration der Feldgleichungen der Gravitation, Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys.) 1916 (1916) 688

  3. [3]

    Einstein, ¨Uber Gravitationswellen, Sitzungsber

    A. Einstein, ¨Uber Gravitationswellen, Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys.) 1918 (1918) 154

  4. [4]

    NANOGrav collaboration, The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background, Astrophys. J. Lett. 951 (2023) L8 [ 2306.16213]

  5. [5]

    The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array III. Search for gravitational wave signals

    EPTA, InPTA: collaboration, The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - III. Search for gravitational wave signals , Astron. Astrophys. 678 (2023) A50 [2306.16214]

  6. [6]

    Search for an isotropic gravitational-wave background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array

    D.J. Reardon et al., Search for an Isotropic Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array, Astrophys. J. Lett. 951 (2023) L6 [ 2306.16215]

  7. [7]

    Searching for the nano-Hertz stochastic gravitational wave background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I

    H. Xu et al., Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I , Res. Astron. Astrophys. 23 (2023) 075024 [2306.16216]

  8. [8]

    The MeerKAT Pulsar Timing Array: The first search for gravitational waves with the MeerKAT radio telescope,

    M.T. Miles et al., The MeerKAT Pulsar Timing Array: the first search for gravitational waves with the MeerKAT radio telescope , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 536 (2024) 1489 [2412.01153]

  9. [9]

    Cosmological Backgrounds of Gravitational Waves

    C. Caprini and D.G. Figueroa, Cosmological Backgrounds of Gravitational Waves , Class. Quant. Grav. 35 (2018) 163001 [ 1801.04268]

  10. [10]

    Starobinsky, A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity , Phys

    A.A. Starobinsky, A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity , Phys. Lett. B 91 (1980) 99. – 27 –

  11. [11]

    Guth, The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems, Phys

    A.H. Guth, The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems, Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981) 347

  12. [12]

    Linde, A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems , Phys

    A.D. Linde, A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems , Phys. Lett. B 108 (1982) 389

  13. [13]

    Albrecht and P.J

    A. Albrecht and P.J. Steinhardt, Cosmology for Grand Unified Theories with Radiatively Induced Symmetry Breaking, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 (1982) 1220

  14. [14]

    Starobinsky, Dynamics of Phase Transition in the New Inflationary Universe Scenario and Generation of Perturbations , Phys

    A.A. Starobinsky, Dynamics of Phase Transition in the New Inflationary Universe Scenario and Generation of Perturbations , Phys. Lett. B 117 (1982) 175

  15. [15]

    Linde, Chaotic Inflation, Phys

    A.D. Linde, Chaotic Inflation, Phys. Lett. B 129 (1983) 177

  16. [16]

    Mukhanov and G.V

    V.F. Mukhanov and G.V. Chibisov, Quantum Fluctuations and a Nonsingular Universe , JETP Lett. 33 (1981) 532

  17. [17]

    Mukhanov and G.V

    V.F. Mukhanov and G.V. Chibisov, The Vacuum energy and large scale structure of the universe, Sov. Phys. JETP 56 (1982) 258

  18. [18]

    Hawking, The Development of Irregularities in a Single Bubble Inflationary Universe , Phys

    S.W. Hawking, The Development of Irregularities in a Single Bubble Inflationary Universe , Phys. Lett. B 115 (1982) 295

  19. [19]

    Guth and S.Y

    A.H. Guth and S.Y. Pi, Fluctuations in the New Inflationary Universe , Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 (1982) 1110

  20. [20]

    Bardeen, P.J

    J.M. Bardeen, P.J. Steinhardt and M.S. Turner, Spontaneous Creation of Almost Scale - Free Density Perturbations in an Inflationary Universe , Phys. Rev. D 28 (1983) 679

  21. [21]

    Grishchuk, Amplification of gravitational waves in an istropic universe , Zh

    L.P. Grishchuk, Amplification of gravitational waves in an istropic universe , Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 67 (1974) 825

  22. [22]

    Starobinsky, Spectrum of relict gravitational radiation and the early state of the universe, JETP Lett

    A.A. Starobinsky, Spectrum of relict gravitational radiation and the early state of the universe, JETP Lett. 30 (1979) 682

  23. [23]

    Rubakov, M.V

    V.A. Rubakov, M.V. Sazhin and A.V. Veryaskin, Graviton Creation in the Inflationary Universe and the Grand Unification Scale , Phys. Lett. B 115 (1982) 189

  24. [24]

    Fabbri and M.d

    R. Fabbri and M.d. Pollock, The Effect of Primordially Produced Gravitons upon the Anisotropy of the Cosmological Microwave Background Radiation , Phys. Lett. B 125 (1983) 445

  25. [25]

    Abbott and M.B

    L.F. Abbott and M.B. Wise, Constraints on Generalized Inflationary Cosmologies , Nucl. Phys. B 244 (1984) 541

  26. [26]

    CMB-S4 collaboration, CMB-S4: Forecasting Constraints on Primordial Gravitational Waves, Astrophys. J. 926 (2022) 54 [ 2008.12619]

  27. [27]

    Agazie et al., The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Running of the Spectral Index , Astrophys

    G. Agazie et al., The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Running of the Spectral Index , Astrophys. J. Lett. 978 (2025) L29 [ 2408.10166]

  28. [28]

    NANOGrav collaboration, The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Search for Signals from New Physics, Astrophys. J. Lett. 951 (2023) L11 [ 2306.16219]

  29. [29]

    Gravitational waves from inflation

    M.C. Guzzetti, N. Bartolo, M. Liguori and S. Matarrese, Gravitational waves from inflation, Riv. Nuovo Cim. 39 (2016) 399 [ 1605.01615]

  30. [30]

    Scalar induced gravitational waves review

    G. Dom` enech,Scalar Induced Gravitational Waves Review , Universe 7 (2021) 398 [2109.01398]. – 28 –

  31. [31]

    Primordial magnetic fields from pseudo-Goldstone bosons

    W.D. Garretson, G.B. Field and S.M. Carroll, Primordial magnetic fields from pseudoGoldstone bosons, Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 5346 [ hep-ph/9209238]

  32. [32]

    N-flationary magnetic fields

    M.M. Anber and L. Sorbo, N-flationary magnetic fields , JCAP 10 (2006) 018 [astro-ph/0606534]

  33. [33]

    Anber and L

    M.M. Anber and L. Sorbo, Naturally inflating on steep potentials through electromagnetic dissipation, Physical Review D 81 (2010)

  34. [34]

    Freese, J.A

    K. Freese, J.A. Frieman and A.V. Olinto, Natural inflation with pseudo - Nambu-Goldstone bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 (1990) 3233

  35. [35]

    Durrer, L

    R. Durrer, L. Hollenstein and R.K. Jain, Can slow roll inflation induce relevant helical magnetic fields?, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2011 (2011)

  36. [36]

    Generation of large-scale magnetic fields, non-Gaussianity, and primordial gravitational waves in inflationary cosmology

    K. Bamba, Generation of large-scale magnetic fields, non-Gaussianity, and primordial gravitational waves in inflationary cosmology , Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 043509 [ 1411.4335]

  37. [37]

    Consistent generation of magnetic fields in axion inflation models

    T. Fujita, R. Namba, Y. Tada, N. Takeda and H. Tashiro, Consistent generation of magnetic fields in axion inflation models , JCAP 05 (2015) 054 [ 1503.05802]

  38. [38]

    Magnetogenesis from axion inflation

    P. Adshead, J.T. Giblin, T.R. Scully and E.I. Sfakianakis, Magnetogenesis from axion inflation, JCAP 10 (2016) 039 [ 1606.08474]

  39. [40]

    Gauge-preheating and the end of axion inflation

    P. Adshead, J.T. Giblin, T.R. Scully and E.I. Sfakianakis, Gauge-preheating and the end of axion inflation, JCAP 12 (2015) 034 [ 1502.06506]

  40. [41]

    A numerical study of pseudoscalar inflation with an axion-gauge field coupling

    S.-L. Cheng, W. Lee and K.-W. Ng, Numerical study of pseudoscalar inflation with an axion-gauge field coupling, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 063510 [ 1508.00251]

  41. [42]

    Adshead, J

    P. Adshead, J.T. Giblin and Z.J. Weiner, Gravitational waves from gauge preheating , Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 043525 [ 1805.04550]

  42. [43]

    Lattice formulation of axion inflation. Application to preheating

    J.R.C. Cuissa and D.G. Figueroa, Lattice formulation of axion inflation. Application to preheating, JCAP 06 (2019) 002 [ 1812.03132]

  43. [44]

    Adshead, J

    P. Adshead, J.T. Giblin, M. Pieroni and Z.J. Weiner, Constraining axion inflation with gravitational waves from preheating, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 083534 [ 1909.12842]

  44. [45]

    Adshead, J

    P. Adshead, J.T. Giblin, M. Pieroni and Z.J. Weiner, Constraining Axion Inflation with Gravitational Waves across 29 Decades in Frequency , Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 171301 [1909.12843]

  45. [46]

    Sharma, A

    R. Sharma, A. Brandenburg, K. Subramanian and A. Vikman, Lattice simulations of axion-U(1) inflation: gravitational waves, magnetic fields, and scalar statistics , JCAP 05 (2025) 079 [ 2411.04854]

  46. [47]

    Large Nongaussianity in Axion Inflation

    N. Barnaby and M. Peloso, Large Nongaussianity in Axion Inflation , Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 181301 [ 1011.1500]

  47. [48]

    Phenomenology of a Pseudo-Scalar Inflaton: Naturally Large Nongaussianity

    N. Barnaby, R. Namba and M. Peloso, Phenomenology of a Pseudo-Scalar Inflaton: Naturally Large Nongaussianity, JCAP 04 (2011) 009 [ 1102.4333]

  48. [49]

    Parity violation in the Cosmic Microwave Background from a pseudoscalar inflaton

    L. Sorbo, Parity violation in the Cosmic Microwave Background from a pseudoscalar inflaton, JCAP 06 (2011) 003 [ 1101.1525]. – 29 –

  49. [50]

    Particle production during inflation and gravitational waves detectable by ground-based interferometers

    J.L. Cook and L. Sorbo, Particle production during inflation and gravitational waves detectable by ground-based interferometers, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 023534 [ 1109.0022]

  50. [51]

    Gauge field production in SUGRA inflation: local non-Gaussianity and primordial black holes

    A. Linde, S. Mooij and E. Pajer, Gauge field production in supergravity inflation: Local non-Gaussianity and primordial black holes , Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 103506 [ 1212.1693]

  51. [52]

    Axion inflation with gauge field production and primordial black holes

    E. Bugaev and P. Klimai, Axion inflation with gauge field production and primordial black holes, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 103501 [ 1312.7435]

  52. [53]

    Universal Constraints on Axions from Inflation

    R.Z. Ferreira and M.S. Sloth, Universal Constraints on Axions from Inflation , JHEP 12 (2014) 139 [ 1409.5799]

  53. [54]

    Primordial gravitational waves for universality classes of pseudoscalar inflation

    V. Domcke, M. Pieroni and P. Bin´ etruy,Primordial gravitational waves for universality classes of pseudoscalar inflation , JCAP 06 (2016) 031 [ 1603.01287]

  54. [55]

    Domcke, V

    V. Domcke, V. Guidetti, Y. Welling and A. Westphal, Resonant backreaction in axion inflation, JCAP 09 (2020) 009 [ 2002.02952]

  55. [56]

    Corb` a and L

    S.P. Corb` a and L. Sorbo,Correlated scalar perturbations and gravitational waves from axion inflation, JCAP 10 (2024) 024 [ 2403.03338]

  56. [57]

    Durrer, O

    R. Durrer, O. Sobol and S. Vilchinskii, Backreaction from gauge fields produced during inflation, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 043540 [ 2303.04583]

  57. [58]

    Greco and M

    F. Greco and M. Peloso, Analytic results in aligned axion inflation , JCAP 01 (2025) 074 [2409.01126]

  58. [59]

    ¨Ozsoy and G

    O. ¨Ozsoy and G. Tasinato, Inflation and Primordial Black Holes , Universe 9 (2023) 203 [2301.03600]

  59. [60]

    Talebian and H

    A. Talebian and H. Firouzjahi, Axion USR Inflation , 2507.02685

  60. [61]

    A flashing beacon in axion inflation: recurring bursts of gravitational waves in the strong backreaction regime,

    J. Garcia-Bellido, A. Papageorgiou, M. Peloso and L. Sorbo, A flashing beacon in axion inflation: recurring bursts of gravitational waves in the strong backreaction regime , JCAP 01 (2024) 034 [ 2303.13425]

  61. [62]

    Peloso and L

    M. Peloso and L. Sorbo, Instability in axion inflation with strong backreaction from gauge modes, JCAP 01 (2023) 038 [ 2209.08131]

  62. [63]

    Caravano, E

    A. Caravano, E. Komatsu, K.D. Lozanov and J. Weller, Lattice simulations of Abelian gauge fields coupled to axions during inflation , Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 123530 [ 2110.10695]

  63. [64]

    von Eckardstein, M

    R. von Eckardstein, M. Peloso, K. Schmitz, O. Sobol and L. Sorbo, Axion inflation in the strong-backreaction regime: decay of the Anber-Sorbo solution , JHEP 11 (2023) 183 [2309.04254]

  64. [65]

    Figueroa, J

    D.G. Figueroa, J. Lizarraga, A. Urio and J. Urrestilla, Strong Backreaction Regime in Axion Inflation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (2023) 151003 [ 2303.17436]

  65. [66]

    Caravano, E

    A. Caravano, E. Komatsu, K.D. Lozanov and J. Weller, Lattice simulations of axion-U(1) inflation, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 043504 [ 2204.12874]

  66. [67]

    Domcke, Y

    V. Domcke, Y. Ema and S. Sandner, Perturbatively including inhomogeneities in axion inflation, JCAP 03 (2024) 019 [ 2310.09186]

  67. [68]

    Figueroa, J

    D.G. Figueroa, J. Lizarraga, N. Loayza, A. Urio and J. Urrestilla, Nonlinear dynamics of axion inflation: A detailed lattice study , Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025) 063545 [ 2411.16368]

  68. [69]

    Gauge Field and Fermion Production during Axion Inflation

    V. Domcke and K. Mukaida, Gauge Field and Fermion Production during Axion Inflation , JCAP 11 (2018) 020 [ 1806.08769]. – 30 –

  69. [70]

    Sobol, E.V

    O.O. Sobol, E.V. Gorbar and S.I. Vilchinskii, Backreaction of electromagnetic fields and the Schwinger effect in pseudoscalar inflation magnetogenesis , Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 063523 [1907.10443]

  70. [71]

    Domcke, Y

    V. Domcke, Y. Ema and K. Mukaida, Chiral Anomaly, Schwinger Effect, Euler-Heisenberg Lagrangian, and application to axion inflation , JHEP 02 (2020) 055 [ 1910.01205]

  71. [72]

    Gorbar, K

    E.V. Gorbar, K. Schmitz, O.O. Sobol and S.I. Vilchinskii, Gauge-field production during axion inflation in the gradient expansion formalism , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 123504 [2109.01651]

  72. [73]

    Gorbar, K

    E.V. Gorbar, K. Schmitz, O.O. Sobol and S.I. Vilchinskii, Hypermagnetogenesis from axion inflation: Model-independent estimates , Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 043530 [ 2111.04712]

  73. [74]

    Fujita, J

    T. Fujita, J. Kume, K. Mukaida and Y. Tada, Effective treatment of U(1) gauge field and charged particles in axion inflation , JCAP 09 (2022) 023 [ 2204.01180]

  74. [75]

    Cado and M

    Y. Cado and M. Quir´ os,Numerical study of the Schwinger effect in axion inflation , Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 123527 [ 2208.10977]

  75. [76]

    Domcke, K

    V. Domcke, K. Kamada, K. Mukaida, K. Schmitz and M. Yamada, Wash-in leptogenesis after axion inflation , JHEP 01 (2023) 053 [ 2210.06412]

  76. [77]

    Gorbar, A.I

    E.V. Gorbar, A.I. Momot, I.V. Rudenok, O.O. Sobol, S.I. Vilchinskii and I.V. Oleinikova, Chirality Production during Axion Inflation , Ukr. J. Phys. 68 (2023) 717 [ 2111.05848]

  77. [78]

    Bastero-Gil, P.B

    M. Bastero-Gil, P.B. Ferraz, L. Ubaldi and R. Vega-Morales, Schwinger dark matter production, JCAP 10 (2024) 078 [ 2312.15137]

  78. [79]

    Bastero-Gil, P.B

    M. Bastero-Gil, P.B. Ferraz, L. Ubaldi and R. Vega-Morales, Super heavy dark matter from inflationary Schwinger production , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 095019 [ 2311.09475]

  79. [80]

    von Eckardstein, K

    R. von Eckardstein, K. Schmitz and O. Sobol, On the Schwinger effect during axion inflation, JHEP 02 (2025) 096 [ 2408.16538]

  80. [81]

    Schwinger effect in axion inflation on a lattice

    O. Iarygina, E.I. Sfakianakis and A. Brandenburg, Schwinger effect in axion inflation on a lattice, 2506.20538

Showing first 80 references.