Pith sign in

REVIEW

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1811.00313 v3 pith:VYFMEI6N submitted 2018-11-01 cs.CV

Convolutional Recurrent Predictor: Implicit Representation for Multi-target Filtering and Tracking

classification cs.CV
keywords trackingmulti-targetalgorithmsfilteringmodelmotionrecurrentapproach
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Defining a multi-target motion model, which is an important step of tracking algorithms, can be very challenging. Using fixed models (as in several generative Bayesian algorithms, such as Kalman filters) can fail to accurately predict sophisticated target motions. On the other hand, sequential learning of the motion model (for example, using recurrent neural networks) can be computationally complex and difficult due to the variable unknown number of targets. In this paper, we propose a multi-target filtering and tracking algorithm which learns the motion model, simultaneously for all targets, from an implicitly represented state map and performs spatio-temporal data prediction. To this end, the multi-target state is modelled over a continuous hypothetical target space, using random finite sets and Gaussian mixture probability hypothesis density formulations. The prediction step is recursively performed using a deep convolutional recurrent neural network with a long short-term memory architecture, which is trained as a regression block, on the fly, over "probability density difference" maps. Our approach is evaluated over widely used pedestrian tracking benchmarks, remarkably outperforming state-of-the-art multi-target filtering algorithms, while giving competitive results when compared with other tracking approaches: The proposed approach generates an average 40.40 and 62.29 optimal sub-pattern assignment (OSPA) errors on MOT15 and MOT16/17 datasets, respectively, while producing 62.0%, 70.0% and 66.9% multi-object tracking accuracy (MOTA) on MOT16/17, PNNL Parking Lot and PETS09 pedestrian tracking datasets, respectively, when publicly available detectors are used.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.