Pith sign in

REVIEW

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1811.01261 v3 pith:DAX45LT2 submitted 2018-11-03 stat.ME math.STstat.APstat.TH

Canonical Least Favorable Submodels:A New TMLE Procedure for Multidimensional Parameters

classification stat.ME math.STstat.APstat.TH
keywords tmleinterestparameterparameterstargeteddimensionalestimationfavorable
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper is a fundamental addition to the world of targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE) (or likewise, targeted minimum loss estimation) for simultaneous estimation of multi-dimensional parameters of interest. TMLE, as part of the targeted learning framework, offers a crucial step in constructing efficient plug-in estimators for nonparametric or semiparametric models. The so-called targeting step of targeted learning, involves fluctuating the initial fit of the model in a way that maximally adjusts the plug-in estimate per change in the log likelihood. Previously for multidimensional parameters of interest, iterative TMLE's were constructed using locally least favorable submodels as defined in van der Laan and Gruber, 2016, which are indexed by a multidimensional fluctuation parameter. In this paper we define a canonical least favorable submodel in terms of a single dimensional epsilon for a $d$-dimensional parameter of interest. One can view the clfm as the iterative analog to the one-step TMLE as constructed in van der Laan and Gruber, 2016. It is currently implemented in several software packages we provide in the last section. Using a single epsilon for the targeting step in TMLE could be useful for high dimensional parameters, where using a fluctuation parameter of the same dimension as the parameter of interest could suffer the consequences of curse of dimensionality. The clfm also enables placing the so-called clever covariate denominator as an inverse weight in an offset intercept model. It has been shown that such weighting mitigates the effect of large inverse weights sometimes caused by near positivity violations.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.