Pith sign in

REVIEW

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2010.00254 v1 pith:YYNSHLPC submitted 2020-10-01 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.SR

Filling the Black Hole Mass Gap: Avoiding Pair Instability in Massive Stars through Addition of Non-Nuclear Energy

classification astro-ph.HE astro-ph.SR
keywords odotenergystarblackinstabilitymasspairsource
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In standard stellar evolution, stars with masses ranging from approximately $150$ to $240 M_\odot$ are expected to evolve to a pair instability supernova with no black hole (BH) remnant. This evolutionary behavior leads to a predicted gap in the black hole mass function from approximately $50$ to $140 M_\odot$. Yet the LIGO and Virgo Collaborations[1] recently discovered black holes of masses $66 M_\odot$ and $85 M_\odot$ in the gravitational wave event GW190521. We propose a new method to populate the BH mass gap. If an energy source is added throughout the star in addition to nuclear fusion, it is possible for the altered evolution to avoid the complete destruction of a pair instability supernova, and instead a BH remnant is left behind. An example of an extra energy source is dark matter annihilation within the star, but our results hold more generally. We show this phenomenon by exploring the effect of adding an energy source independent of temperature and density to a $180 M_\odot$ star, using the MESA one-dimensional stellar evolution software. If $\sim50$\% of the star's energy is due to this new source, the star is capable of avoiding the pair instability entirely and evolving towards a core-collapse supernova and ultimately a BH remnant with mass $\sim 120 M_\odot$.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.