Pith. sign in

Weighted-Reward Preference Optimization for Implicit Model Fusion

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

While fusing heterogeneous open-source LLMs with varying architectures and sizes can potentially integrate the strengths of different models, existing fusion methods face significant challenges, such as vocabulary alignment and merging distribution matrices. These procedures are not only complex but also prone to introducing noise and errors. In this paper, we propose an implicit fusion method, Weighted-Reward Preference Optimization (WRPO), which leverages preference optimization between the source LLMs and the target LLM to transfer their capabilities effectively. WRPO eliminates the need for vocabulary alignment and matrix fusion and can be efficiently scaled to accommodate various LLMs. To address distributional deviations between the source and target LLMs, WRPO introduces a progressive adaptation strategy that gradually shifts reliance on preferred examples from the target LLM to the source LLMs. Extensive experiments on the MT-Bench, AlpacaEval-2, and Arena-Hard benchmarks demonstrate that WRPO consistently outperforms existing knowledge fusion methods and various fine-tuning baselines. When applied to LLaMA3-8B-Instruct as the target model, WRPO achieves a length-controlled win rate of 55.9% against GPT-4-Preview-1106 on AlpacaEval-2 and a win rate of 46.2% against GPT-4-0314 on Arena-Hard. Our code is available at https://github.com/SLIT-AI/WRPO.

fields

cs.AI 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

representative citing papers

CortexDebate: Debating Sparsely and Equally for Multi-Agent Debate

cs.AI · 2025-07-05 · conditional · novelty 5.0

CortexDebate prunes the multi-agent debate graph every round using a McKinsey-style trust score per directed link, reporting accuracy gains over full-debate baselines on eight datasets with shorter per-agent contexts.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • CortexDebate: Debating Sparsely and Equally for Multi-Agent Debate cs.AI · 2025-07-05 · conditional · none · ref 50 · internal anchor

    CortexDebate prunes the multi-agent debate graph every round using a McKinsey-style trust score per directed link, reporting accuracy gains over full-debate baselines on eight datasets with shorter per-agent contexts.