A historical meta-analysis of 163 Hubble constant measurements argues published error bars were often underestimated and recalibrates the 4.4-sigma Hubble tension down to an equivalent 2.1-sigma effect.
Title resolution pending
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
physics.hist-ph 1years
2024 1verdicts
REJECT 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Underestimation of Hubble constant error bars: a historical analysis
A historical meta-analysis of 163 Hubble constant measurements argues published error bars were often underestimated and recalibrates the 4.4-sigma Hubble tension down to an equivalent 2.1-sigma effect.