A chest X-ray report quality metric that combines fine-grained text finding matching with anatomical grounding on images is proposed and shown to be more sensitive to factual errors than BLEU, BERTScore, and RadGraph.
Title resolution pending
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.CL 1years
2024 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Evaluating Automated Radiology Report Quality through Fine-Grained Phrasal Grounding of Clinical Findings
A chest X-ray report quality metric that combines fine-grained text finding matching with anatomical grounding on images is proposed and shown to be more sensitive to factual errors than BLEU, BERTScore, and RadGraph.