Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Thermostat Influence on the Structural Development and Material Removal during Abrasion of Nanocrystalline Ferrite

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1704.04384 v1 pith:7S7YHFTR submitted 2017-04-14 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords heatcasesdifferencesgeneratedmodenanomachiningnormalpiece
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We consider a nanomachining process of hard, abrasive particles grinding on the rough surface of a polycrystalline ferritic work piece. Using extensive large-scale molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, we show that the mode of thermostatting, i.e., the way that the heat generated through deformation and friction is removed from the system, has crucial impact on tribological and materials related phenomena. By adopting an electron-phonon coupling approach to parametrize the thermostat of the system, thus including the electronic contribution to the thermal conductivity of iron, we can reproduce the experimentally measured values that yield realistic temperature gradients in the work piece. We compare these results to those obtained by assuming the two extreme cases of only phononic heat conduction and instantaneous removal of the heat generated in the machining interface. Our discussion of the differences between these three cases reveals that although the average shear stress is virtually temperature independent up to a normal pressure of approximately 1 GPa, the grain and chip morphology as well as most relevant quantities depend heavily on the mode of thermostatting beyond a normal pressure of 0.4 GPa. These pronounced differences can be explained by the thermally activated processes that guide the reaction of the Fe lattice to the external mechanical and thermal loads caused by nanomachining.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools