REVIEW 2 cited by
Maximal LELM Distinguishability of Qubit and Qutrit Bell States Using Projective and Non-Projective Measurements
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Numerous quantum information protocols make use of maximally entangled two-particle states, or Bell states, in which information is stored in the correlations between the two particles rather than their individual properties. Retrieving information stored in this way means distinguishing between different Bell states, yet the well known no-go theorem establishes that projective linear evolution and local measurement (LELM) detection schemes can only reliably distinguish three of the four qubit Bell states. We establish maximum distinguishability of the qutrit Bell states of bosons via projective LELM measurements; only three of the nine Bell states can be distinguished. Next, we extend to the case of non-projective measurements. We strengthen the no-go theorem by showing that general LELM measurements cannot reliably distinguish all four qubit Bell states. We also establish that at most five qutrit Bell states can be distinguished with generalized LELM measurements.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Exchange-Symmetrized Qudit Bell Bases and Bell-State Distinguishability
For any even d, an exchange-symmetrized qudit Bell basis exists, and linear-evolution local-measurement devices can distinguish 2d-1 of its Bell states, the maximum allowed.
-
Dynamic violation of Bell's inequalities in the angular momentum representation
A reformulation of density matrices in the angular momentum basis is applied to Bell-CHSH inequalities, with a claimed dynamic approach to the Cirel'son bound for qubit-qutrit states.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.