Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Covariance Modelling and its Impact on Parameter Estimation and Quality of Fit

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2012.08568 v3 pith:Z35E6XKS submitted 2020-12-15 astro-ph.CO

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords covariancemodelimpactparametersurveydarkenergyestimation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

We describe and test the fiducial covariance matrix model for the combined 2-point function analysis of the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 (DES-Y3) dataset. Using a variety of new ansatzes for covariance modelling and testing we validate the assumptions and approximations of this model. These include the assumption of a Gaussian likelihood, the trispectrum contribution to the covariance, the impact of evaluating the model at a wrong set of parameters, the impact of masking and survey geometry, deviations from Poissonian shot-noise, galaxy weighting schemes and other, sub-dominant effects. We find that our covariance model is robust and that its approximations have little impact on goodness-of-fit and parameter estimation. The largest impact on best-fit figure-of-merit arises from the so-called $f_{\mathrm{sky}}$ approximation for dealing with finite survey area, which on average increases the $\chi^2$ between maximum posterior model and measurement by $3.7\%$ ($\Delta \chi^2 \approx 18.9$). Standard methods to go beyond this approximation fail for DES-Y3, but we derive an approximate scheme to deal with these features. For parameter estimation, our ignorance of the exact parameters at which to evaluate our covariance model causes the dominant effect. We find that it increases the scatter of maximum posterior values for $\Omega_m$ and $\sigma_8$ by about $3\%$ and for the dark energy equation of state parameter by about $5\%$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Analytical covariances for catalogue-based pseudo-$C_\ell$s

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A new analytic method computes disconnected covariance matrices for catalogue-based pseudo-Cℓ power spectra by smoothing source positions and treating self-pair shot noise exactly.

  2. Pixelization effects in cosmic shear angular power spectra

    astro-ph.CO 2025-01 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Pixelization biases in pseudo-C_ell cosmic shear estimators are modeled from first principles, including a spin-2 HEALPix window derivation and empty-pixel corrections.

  3. One with HI: Modelling HI Intensity Mapping one-point statistics including systematics

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The HI one-point PDF, modelled with large-deviation statistics and validated against simulations including beam and foreground systematics, tightens cosmological constraints and breaks the sigma8-b1 degeneracy beyond ...

  4. Multiprobe Cosmology from the Abundance of SPT Clusters and DES Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing

    astro-ph.CO 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Combining SPT cluster counts with DES galaxy clustering and weak lensing yields Ωm=0.300±0.017, σ8=0.797±0.026, and S8=0.796±0.013, 1.6σ below Planck, with a ∑mν<0.25 eV limit when combined with Planck.

  5. Growth, geometry, and early-universe split of the matter density parameter $\Omega_{\rm m}$

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.5 of 10

    Splitting Ω_m into geometry, growth, and early-universe regimes yields mutually compatible values, yet ΔΩ_m^{geo,early} is 2σ from zero under combined DES, Planck (scale-cut), DESI, Pantheon+, and RSD data.

Pith tools