Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Quantifying multi-point ordering in alloys

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2102.10010 v2 pith:QAW6JZ2G submitted 2021-02-19 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords orderingmulti-pointsystemschemicalprobabilitiesquantifyalloyapproximating
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

A central problem in multicomponent lattice systems is to systematically quantify multi-point ordering. Ordering in such systems is often described in terms of pairs, even though this is not sufficient when three-point and higher-order interactions are included in the Hamiltonian. Current models and parameters for multi-point ordering are often only applicable for very specific cases and/or require approximating a subset of correlated occupational variables on a lattice as being uncorrelated. In this work, a cluster order parameter (ClstOP) is introduced to systematically quantify arbitrary multi-point ordering motifs in substitutional systems through direct calculations of normalized cluster probabilities. These parameters can describe multi-point chemical ordering in crystal systems with multiple sublattices, multiple components, and systems with reduced symmetry. These are defined within and applied to quantify four-point chemical ordering motifs in platinum/palladium alloy nanoparticles that are practical interest to the synthesis of catalytic nanocages. Impacts of chemical ordering on alloy nanocage stability are discussed. It is demonstrated that approximating 4-point probabilities from superpositions of lower order pair probabilities is not sufficient in cases where 3 and 4-body terms are included in the energy expression. Conclusions about the formation mechanisms of nanocages may change significantly when using common pair approximations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools