Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Measurements of the branching fractions of $\Lambda_c^+ \to p \eta$ and $\Lambda_c^+ \to p \pi^0$ decays at Belle

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2102.12226 v2 pith:VVER2ZYO submitted 2021-02-24 hep-ex hep-ph

Belle Collaboration: S. X. Li , C. P. Shen , I. Adachi , J. K. Ahn , H. Aihara , D. M. Asner , T. Aushev , R. Ayad
show 198 more authors
V. Babu S. Bahinipati P. Behera J. Bennett F. Bernlochner M. Bessner V. Bhardwaj B. Bhuyan T. Bilka J. Biswal A. Bobrov A. Bozek M. Bracko T. E. Browder M. Campajola L. Cao D. Červenkov M.-C. Chang A. Chen B. G. Cheon K. Chilikin H. E. Cho K. Cho Y. Choi S. Choudhury D. Cinabro S. Cunliffe S. Das N. Dash G. De Nardo R. Dhamija F. Di Capua Z. Doležal T. V. Dong S. Eidelman D. Epifanov T. Ferber D. Ferlewicz B. G. Fulsom R. Garg V. Gaur A. Garmash A. Giri P. Goldenzweig B. Golob O. Grzymkowska K. Gudkova C. Hadjivasiliou O. Hartbrich K. Hayasaka H. Hayashii M. T. Hedges W.-S. Hou C.-L. Hsu T. Iijima K. Inami G. Inguglia A. Ishikawa R. Itoh M. Iwasaki Y. Iwasaki W. W. Jacobs E.-J. Jang S. Jia Y. Jin C. W. Joo K. K. Joo A. B. Kaliyar K. H. Kang G. Karyan Y. Kato T. Kawasaki H. Kichimi B. H. Kim C. H. Kim D. Y. Kim K.-H. Kim S. H. Kim Y.-K. Kim K. Kinoshita P. Kodyš T. Konno A. Korobov S. Korpar E. Kovalenko P. Križan R. Kroeger P. Krokovny T. Kuhr M. Kumar K. Kumara A. Kuzmin Y.-J. Kwon K. Lalwani J. S. Lange I. S. Lee S. C. Lee C. H. Li L. K. Li Y. B. Li L. Li Gioi J. Libby K. Lieret D. Liventsev M. Masuda T. Matsuda D. Matvienko M. Merola F. Metzner R. Mizuk S. Mohanty T. Mori M. Nakao Z. Natkaniec A. Natochii L. Nayak M. Niiyama N. K. Nisar S. Nishida H. Ono Y. Onuki P. Pakhlov G. Pakhlova T. Pang S. Pardi H. Park S.-H. Park S. Patra S. Paul T. K. Pedlar R. Pestotnik L. E. Piilonen T. Podobnik V. Popov E. Prencipe M. T. Prim M. Röhrken A. Rostomyan N. Rout G. Russo D. Sahoo Y. Sakai S. Sandilya A. Sangal L. Santelj T. Sanuki V. Savinov G. Schnell J. Schueler C. Schwanda Y. Seino K. Senyo M. E. Sevior M. Shapkin C. Sharma V. Shebalin J.-G. Shiu B. Shwartz E. Solovieva S. Stanič M. Starič Z. S. Stottler M. Sumihama T. Sumiyoshi W. Sutcliffe M. Takizawa K. Tanida Y. Tao F. Tenchini K. Trabelsi M. Uchida S. Uehara T. Uglov K. Uno S. Uno P. Urquijo R. Van Tonder G. Varner A. Vossen C. H. Wang E. Wang M.-Z. Wang P. Wang S. Watanuki E. Won X. Xu B. D. Yabsley W. Yan S. B. Yang H. Ye J. Yelton J. H. Yin C. Z. Yuan Y. Yusa Z. P. Zhang V. Zhilich V. Zhukova V. Zhulanov
This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-exhep-ph
keywords lambdabranchingtimesbellefractionssignaldatadecays
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We report measurements of the branching fractions of singly Cabibbo-suppressed decays $\Lambda_c^+ \to p \eta$ and $\Lambda_c^+ \to p \pi^0$ using the full Belle data sample corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 980.6 $\rm fb^{-1}$. The data were collected by the Belle detector at the KEKB $e^{+}$$e^{-}$ asymmetric-energy collider. A clear $\Lambda_c^+$ signal is seen in the invariant mass distribution of $p \eta$. The signal yield of the $\Lambda_c^+ \to p \eta$ process is $7734 \pm 263$; from this, we measure the ratio of branching fractions ${\cal B}(\Lambda_c^+ \to p \eta)/{\cal B}(\Lambda_c^+ \to p K^- \pi^+) = (2.258 \pm 0. 077(\rm stat. ) \pm 0.136(\rm syst. ))\times 10^{-2}$, from which we infer the branching fraction ${\cal B}(\Lambda_c^+ \to p \eta) = (1.42 \pm 0.05(\rm stat.) \pm 0.11(\rm syst.)) \times 10^{-3}$. In addition, no significant signal for $\Lambda_c^+ \to p \pi^0$ is found so an upper limit on the branching fraction of ${\cal B}(\Lambda_c^+ \to p \pi^0)<8.0 \times 10^{-5}$ at 90\% credibility level is set, more than three times better than the best current upper limit.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools