Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Beyond Ridge Regression for Distribution-Free Data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2206.08757 v1 pith:4FWD5H4P submitted 2022-06-17 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords regressionridgedataluckinessclasshypothesispnmlprediction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

In supervised batch learning, the predictive normalized maximum likelihood (pNML) has been proposed as the min-max regret solution for the distribution-free setting, where no distributional assumptions are made on the data. However, the pNML is not defined for a large capacity hypothesis class as over-parameterized linear regression. For a large class, a common approach is to use regularization or a model prior. In the context of online prediction where the min-max solution is the Normalized Maximum Likelihood (NML), it has been suggested to use NML with ``luckiness'': A prior-like function is applied to the hypothesis class, which reduces its effective size. Motivated by the luckiness concept, for linear regression we incorporate a luckiness function that penalizes the hypothesis proportionally to its l2 norm. This leads to the ridge regression solution. The associated pNML with luckiness (LpNML) prediction deviates from the ridge regression empirical risk minimizer (Ridge ERM): When the test data reside in the subspace corresponding to the small eigenvalues of the empirical correlation matrix of the training data, the prediction is shifted toward 0. Our LpNML reduces the Ridge ERM error by up to 20% for the PMLB sets, and is up to 4.9% more robust in the presence of distribution shift compared to recent leading methods for UCI sets.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools