Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Obvious manipulations of tops-only voting rules

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.11627 v1 pith:EFJLNFBO submitted 2022-10-20 econ.TH

classification econ.TH
keywords rulesmanipulationsobviousvotingtops-onlyalternativealternativespreferences
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In a voting problem with a finite set of alternatives to choose from, we study the manipulation of tops-only rules. Since all non-dictatorial (onto) voting rules are manipulable when there are more than two alternatives and all preferences are allowed, we look for rules in which manipulations are not obvious. First, we show that a rule does not have obvious manipulations if and only if when an agent vetoes an alternative it can do so with any preference that does not have such alternative in the top. Second, we focus on two classes of tops-only rules: (i) (generalized) median voter schemes, and (ii) voting by committees. For each class, we identify which rules do not have obvious manipulations on the universal domain of preferences.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools