Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Comparing the Photometric Calibration of DESI Imaging and Gaia Synthetic Photometry

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.16630 v1 pith:4O7AVL65 submitted 2023-05-26 astro-ph.IM

classification astro-ph.IM
keywords gaiacalibrationdesiphotometricphotometrypatternssystematicscomparing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

The relative photometric calibration errors in the DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys (LS), which are used for DESI target selection, can leave imprints on the DESI target densities and bias the resulting cosmological measurements. We characterize the LS calibration systematics by comparing the LS stellar photometry with Gaia DR3 synthetic photometry. We find the stellar photometry of LS DR9 and Gaia has an \textsc{rms} difference of 4.7, 3.7, 4.4 mmag in DECam $grz$ bands, respectively, when averaged over an angular scale of 27 arcmin. There are distinct spatial patterns in the photometric offset resembling the Gaia scan patterns (most notably in the synthesized $g$-band) which indicate systematics in the Gaia spectrophotometry, as well as honeycomb patterns due to LS calibration systematics. We also find large and smoothly varying photometric offsets at $\mathrm{Dec}<-29.25^{\circ}$ in LS DR9 which are fixed in DR10.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools