Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 68 references

Coherent Control of an Optical Quantum Dot Using Phonons and Photons

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-24 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A quantum dot can be coherently controlled by both phonons and photons, with mechanical motion enhancing assisted photon scattering over direct detuned paths.

desk verdict Phonon-assisted scattering enhancement in QDs is shown experimentally but rests on unverified separation of channels in the data. read the letter →

arxiv 2404.02079 v2 submitted 2024-04-02 quant-ph

Ryan A DeCrescent , Zixuan Wang , Joseph T Bush , Poolad Imany , Alex Kwiatkowski , Dileep V Reddy , Sae Woo Nam , Richard P Mirin
show 1 more author
Kevin L Silverman
This is my paper
classification quant-ph
keywords quantumdotoptomechanicsphononscoherentcontrolphotonscatteringsurfaceacousticwavemicrowave-to-opticaltransduction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper shows that optical two-level systems such as quantum dots offer distinct advantages for optomechanics because their state can be controlled coherently by mechanical phonons as well as by resonant or detuned photons. Experiments with charge-controlled InAs quantum dots inside surface-acoustic-wave resonators use time-correlated single-photon counting to track population dynamics under combined optical pulses and acoustic drive. At moderate acoustic strengths the setup is arranged so that mechanically assisted scattering becomes stronger than direct detuned scattering from the dot, which the authors link to higher-fidelity microwave-to-optical transduction. Spectral measurements separate Rayleigh and luminescence channels that produce time-dependent spectra, and quantum calculations reproduce the observed excitation, scattering, and emission behavior.

What carries the argument

The coupled quantum-dot-phonon optomechanical system in surface-acoustic-wave resonators, in which mechanical motion assists photon scattering from the dot.

What would settle it

Observation that applying moderate acoustic drive produces no measurable increase in the rate of the assisted scattering channel relative to the direct detuned channel, or that the time-dependent spectra deviate from the predicted dependence on drive strength.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The qubit state of charge-controlled InAs quantum dots in surface-acoustic-wave resonators can be coherently controlled using both phonons and resonant or detuned photons. Time-correlated single-photon counting reveals the resulting population dynamics under engineered optical pulses and mechanical motion. At moderate acoustic drive strengths the scheme is tailored so that mechanically assisted photon scattering is enhanced over direct detuned photon scattering from the quantum dot, offering a route to higher fidelity in quantum microwave-to-optical transduction. Spectral analysis identifies distinct Rayleigh scattering and luminescence channels that produce time-dependent scattering spectra

Load-bearing premise

Time-correlated single-photon counting and spectral measurements cleanly separate the mechanically assisted scattering channel from direct detuned scattering and background without unmodeled decoherence changing the reported dynamics.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Mechanically assisted photon scattering can be made the dominant channel over direct detuned scattering at moderate acoustic drive strengths.
  • Pulsed excitation produces time-dependent scattering spectra arising from separate Rayleigh and luminescence channels.
  • Quantum-mechanical calculations of excitation, scattering, and emission match the measured population dynamics and spectra.
  • The combined phonon-photon control scheme can be used to increase fidelity in quantum microwave-to-optical transduction.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extending acoustic drive to other frequency ranges or materials could allow phonon-photon control to be applied to additional qubit platforms.
  • The same assisted-scattering enhancement might reduce noise in hybrid acoustic-optical quantum networks beyond the transduction case examined here.
  • Time-resolved spectral separation of channels could be used to diagnose and suppress unwanted background processes in similar optomechanical devices.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports coherent control of charge-tunable InAs quantum dots embedded in surface-acoustic-wave resonators, using both mechanical phonons and resonant/detuned optical pulses. Time-correlated single-photon counting and time-dependent spectral measurements are used to demonstrate control of QD population dynamics; at moderate acoustic drive strengths the authors claim that mechanically assisted photon scattering can be made to dominate over direct detuned scattering, with potential application to high-fidelity microwave-to-optical transduction. Quantum-mechanical calculations are stated to agree with the observed Rayleigh versus luminescence channels.

Significance. If the separation of mechanically assisted and direct scattering channels can be shown to be robust against background and decoherence effects, the result would provide a concrete route to phonon-assisted transduction protocols that exploit the discrete level structure of a qubit rather than a bosonic resonator. The combination of pulsed optical control with continuous acoustic drive and the reported agreement between experiment and a full quantum model are strengths that would be of interest to the optomechanics and quantum-networks communities.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4] §4 (Experimental Results) and Fig. 3: The central claim that mechanically assisted scattering is enhanced over direct detuned scattering rests on the isolation of the two channels in TCSPC and spectral data. The manuscript provides no quantitative description of background-subtraction procedure, post-selection criteria, or how time-dependent spectral diffusion and phonon-induced pure dephasing are excluded; without these details it is impossible to assess whether the reported population dynamics are free of unmodeled overlap between channels.
  2. [§5] §5 (Theory and Comparison): The quantum-mechanical calculations are said to agree with experiment, yet the manuscript does not report the values of any free parameters (e.g., pure-dephasing rates, spectral-diffusion linewidths) that were adjusted to achieve the fit, nor does it show the sensitivity of the predicted enhancement ratio to those parameters.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract and introduction use the term “parameter-free” for the theoretical model; this should be clarified or removed if any phenomenological rates are fitted.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions for the time-dependent spectra should explicitly state the integration windows and any normalization applied.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address each major comment below and indicate the changes that will be incorporated in the revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4] §4 (Experimental Results) and Fig. 3: The central claim that mechanically assisted scattering is enhanced over direct detuned scattering rests on the isolation of the two channels in TCSPC and spectral data. The manuscript provides no quantitative description of background-subtraction procedure, post-selection criteria, or how time-dependent spectral diffusion and phonon-induced pure dephasing are excluded; without these details it is impossible to assess whether the reported population dynamics are free of unmodeled overlap between channels.

    Authors: We agree that additional quantitative details on the data-analysis procedures are required. In the revised manuscript we will add an explicit subsection in the Methods describing the background-subtraction routine (mean counts from off-resonance spectral windows), the post-selection window (500 ps around the expected photon arrival time), and the handling of time-dependent spectral diffusion (short integration windows in the spectral data). Phonon-induced pure dephasing is already included in the master-equation model; we will add a short paragraph quantifying residual channel overlap and showing that it remains below 5 % at the drive strengths used for the reported enhancement. These additions will make the separation of channels fully transparent. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§5] §5 (Theory and Comparison): The quantum-mechanical calculations are said to agree with experiment, yet the manuscript does not report the values of any free parameters (e.g., pure-dephasing rates, spectral-diffusion linewidths) that were adjusted to achieve the fit, nor does it show the sensitivity of the predicted enhancement ratio to those parameters.

    Authors: We accept the referee’s observation that parameter values and sensitivity were not reported. The revised Theory section will list all fixed parameters (pure-dephasing rate 0.8 GHz and spectral-diffusion linewidth 1.2 GHz) together with their independent experimental determination from separate linewidth and time-resolved measurements. A new supplementary figure will display the enhancement ratio as a function of ±20 % variations in these parameters, confirming that the dominance of the mechanically assisted channel is preserved within the experimental uncertainty. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: experimental demonstration with independent measurements

full rationale

The paper presents an experimental demonstration of coherent control of InAs quantum dots using phonons and photons in surface-acoustic-wave resonators. Central claims rest on time-correlated single-photon counting and spectral measurements that isolate scattering channels, with quantum-mechanical calculations shown to agree with data. No load-bearing steps reduce by the paper's own equations to fitted inputs, self-definitions, or self-citation chains; the work is self-contained against external benchmarks via direct observation of population dynamics and distinct Rayleigh vs. luminescence channels.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard domain assumptions from quantum optics and optomechanics; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Optical quantum dots behave as controllable two-level systems (qubits).
    Stated explicitly in the opening sentence of the abstract.
  • domain assumption Surface-acoustic-wave resonators supply coherent phonons that interact with the QD without dominant damping or loss channels.
    Invoked throughout the description of mechanical control and population dynamics.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Coherent Control of an Optical Quantum Dot Using Phonons and Photons." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2404.02079

@misc{pith2026240402079,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Coherent Control of an Optical Quantum Dot Using Phonons and Photons},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2404.02079}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2404.02079}
}
read the original abstract

Genuine quantum-mechanical effects are readily observable in modern optomechanical systems comprising bosonic ("classical") optical resonators. Here we describe unique features and advantages of optical two-level systems, or qubits, for optomechanics. The qubit state can be coherently controlled using both phonons and resonant or detuned photons. We experimentally demonstrate this using charge-controlled InAs quantum dots (QDs) in surface-acoustic-wave resonators. Time-correlated single-photon counting measurements reveal the control of QD population dynamics using engineered optical pulses and mechanical motion. As a first example, at moderate acoustic drive strengths, we demonstrate the potential of this technique to maximize fidelity in quantum microwave-to-optical transduction. Specifically, we tailor the scheme so that mechanically assisted photon scattering is enhanced over the direct detuned photon scattering from the QD. Spectral analysis reveals distinct scattering channels related to Rayleigh scattering and luminescence in our pulsed excitation measurements which lead to time-dependent scattering spectra. Quantum-mechanical calculations show good agreement with our experimental results, together providing a comprehensive description of excitation, scattering and emission in a coupled QD-phonon optomechanical system.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2404.02079 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A. Ashkin. Optical trapping and manipulation of neutral particles using lasers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 94, 10 4853–4860 (1997)

    work page 1997

  2. [2]

    Aspelmeyer, T

    M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg, and F. Marquardt. Cavity optomechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 4 1391–1452 (2014)

    work page 2014

  3. [3]

    Blair, L

    D. Blair, L. Ju, and Y. Ma. Optomechanics for Gravitational Wave Detection: From Resonant Bars to Next Generation Laser Interferometers. In P.-F. Cohadon, J. Harris, F. Marquardt, and L. Cugliandolo, editors, Quantum Optomechanics and Nanomechanics: Lecture Notes of the Les Houches Summer School: Volume 105, August 2015 , p. 0. Oxford University Press (20...

    work page 2015

  4. [4]

    Barzanjeh, A

    S. Barzanjeh, A. Xuereb, S. Gr¨ oblacher, M. Paternostro, C. A. Regal, and E. M. Weig. Optomechanics for quantum technologies. Nat. Phys. 18, 1 15–24 (2022). 10

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    Schliesser, R

    A. Schliesser, R. Rivi` ere, G. Anetsberger, O. Arcizet, and T. J. Kippenberg. Resolved-sideband cooling of a micromechanical oscillator. Nature Phys 4, 5 415–419 (2008)

    work page 2008

  6. [6]

    J. Chan, T. P. M. Alegre, A. H. Safavi-Naeini, J. T. Hill, A. Krause, S. Gr¨ oblacher, M. Aspelmeyer, and O. Painter. Laser cooling of a nanomechanical oscillator into its quantum ground state. Nature 478, 7367 89–92 (2011)

    work page 2011

  7. [7]

    Brubaker, J

    B. Brubaker, J. Kindem, M. Urmey, S. Mittal, R. Delaney, P. Burns, M. Vissers, K. Lehnert, and C. Regal. Optomechanical Ground-State Cooling in a Continuous and Efficient Electro-Optic Transducer. Phys. Rev. X12, 2 021062 (2022). Publisher: American Physical Society

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    S. A. Saarinen, N. Kralj, E. C. Langman, Y. Tsaturyan, and A. Schliesser. Laser cooling a membrane-in-the-middle system close to the quantum ground state from room temperature. Optica, OPTICA 10, 3 364–372 (2023)

    work page 2023

Show all 68 references
  1. [9]

    T. P. Purdy, P.-L. Yu, R. W. Peterson, N. S. Kampel, and C. A. Regal. Strong Optomechanical Squeezing of Light. Phys. Rev. X 3, 3 031012 (2013)

    2013

  2. [10]

    R. W. Andrews, R. W. Peterson, T. P. Purdy, K. Cicak, R. W. Simmonds, C. A. Regal, and K. W. Lehnert. Bidirectional and efficient conversion between microwave and optical light. Nature Phys 10, 4 321–326 (2014)

    2014

  3. [11]

    K. C. Balram, M. I. Davan¸ co, J. D. Song, and K. Srinivasan. Coherent coupling between radiofrequency, optical and acoustic waves in piezo-optomechanical circuits. Nature Photon 10, 5 346–352 (2016)

    2016

  4. [12]

    Mirhosseini, A

    M. Mirhosseini, A. Sipahigil, M. Kalaee, and O. Painter. Superconducting qubit to optical photon transduction. Nature 588, 7839 599–603 (2020)

    2020

  5. [13]

    Forsch, R

    M. Forsch, R. Stockill, A. Wallucks, I. Marinkovi´ c, C. G¨ artner, R. A. Norte, F. van Otten, A. Fiore, K. Srinivasan, and S. Gr¨ oblacher. Microwave-to-optics conversion using a mechanical oscillator in its quantum ground state. Nat. Phys. 16, 1 69–74 (2020)

    2020

  6. [14]

    M. J. Weaver, P. Duivestein, A. C. Bernasconi, S. Scharmer, M. Lemang, T. C. v. Thiel, F. Hijazi, B. Hensen, S. Gr¨ oblacher, and R. Stockill. An integrated microwave-to-optics interface for scalable quantum computing. Nat. Nanotechnol. 19, 2 166–172 (2024)

    2024

  7. [15]

    Riedinger, S

    R. Riedinger, S. Hong, R. A. Norte, J. A. Slater, J. Shang, A. G. Krause, V. Anant, M. Aspelmeyer, and S. Gr¨ oblacher. Non-classical correlations between single photons and phonons from a mechanical oscillator. Nature 530, 7590 313–316 (2016)

    2016

  8. [16]

    A. A. Rakhubovsky, D. W. Moore, U. Deli´ c, N. Kiesel, M. Aspelmeyer, and R. Filip. Detecting Nonclassical Correlations in Levitated Cavity Optomechanics. Phys. Rev. Appl. 14, 5 054052 (2020)

    2020

  9. [17]

    Jiang, F

    W. Jiang, F. M. Mayor, S. Malik, R. Van Laer, T. P. McKenna, R. N. Patel, J. D. Witmer, and A. H. Safavi-Naeini. Optically heralded microwave photon addition. Nat. Phys. 19, 10 1423–1428 (2023)

    2023

  10. [18]

    Meesala, D

    S. Meesala, D. Lake, S. Wood, P. Chiappina, C. Zhong, A. D. Beyer, M. D. Shaw, L. Jiang, and O. Painter. Quantum entanglement between optical and microwave photonic qubits (2023). ArXiv:2312.13559 [physics, physics:quant-ph]

    2023

  11. [19]

    K. J. Satzinger, Y. P. Zhong, H.-S. Chang, G. A. Peairs, A. Bienfait, M.-H. Chou, A. Y. Cleland, C. R. Conner, E. Dumur, J. Grebel, I. Gutierrez, B. H. November, R. G. Povey, S. J. Whiteley, D. D. Awschalom, D. I. Schuster, and A. N. Cleland. Quantum control of surface acousti...

    2018

  12. [20]

    Y. Chu, P. Kharel, T. Yoon, L. Frunzio, P. T. Rakich, and R. J. Schoelkopf. Creation and control of multi-phonon Fock states in a bulk acoustic-wave resonator. Nature 563, 7733 666–670 (2018)

    2018

  13. [21]

    S¨ ollner, L

    I. S¨ ollner, L. Midolo, and P. Lodahl. Deterministic Single-Phonon Source Triggered by a Single Photon. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 23 234301 (2016)

    2016

  14. [22]

    T. K. Bracht, M. Cosacchi, T. Seidelmann, M. Cygorek, A. Vagov, V. M. Axt, T. Heindel, and D. E. Reiter. Swing-Up of Quantum Emitter Population Using Detuned Pulses. PRX Quantum 2, 4 040354 (2021)

    2021

  15. [23]

    K. V. Kepesidis, S. D. Bennett, S. Portolan, M. D. Lukin, and P. Rabl. Phonon cooling and lasing with nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond. Phys. Rev. B 88, 6 064105 (2013)

    2013

  16. [24]

    Ester, S

    P. Ester, S. Stufler, S. de Michaelis Vasconcellos, M. Bichler, and A. Zrenner. Ramsey fringes in a single InGaAs/GaAs quantum dot. physica status solidi (b) 243, 10 2229–2232 (2006)

    2006

  17. [25]

    Press, T

    D. Press, T. D. Ladd, B. Zhang, and Y. Yamamoto. Complete quantum control of a single quantum dot spin using ultrafast optical pulses. Nature 456, 7219 218–221 (2008)

    2008

  18. [26]

    Senellart, G

    P. Senellart, G. Solomon, and A. White. High-performance semiconductor quantum-dot single-photon sources. Nature Nanotech 12, 11 1026–1039 (2017)

    2017

  19. [27]

    Trivedi, K

    R. Trivedi, K. A. Fischer, J. Vuˇ ckovi´ c, and K. M¨ uller. Generation of Non-Classical Light Using Semiconductor Quantum Dots. Adv Quantum Tech 3, 1 1900007 (2020)

    2020

  20. [28]

    Z. Luo, S. Sun, A. Karasahin, A. S. Bracker, S. G. Carter, M. K. Yakes, D. Gammon, and E. Waks. A Spin–Photon Interface Using Charge-Tunable Quantum Dots Strongly Coupled to a Cavity. Nano Lett. 19, 10 7072–7077 (2019)

    2019

  21. [29]

    M. H. Appel, A. Tiranov, S. Pabst, M. L. Chan, C. Starup, Y. Wang, L. Midolo, K. Tiurev, S. Scholz, A. D. Wieck, A. Ludwig, A. S. Sørensen, and P. Lodahl. Entangling a Hole Spin with a Time-Bin Photon: A Waveguide Approach for Quantum Dot Sources of Multiphoton Entanglement. P...

    2022

  22. [30]

    Coste, D

    N. Coste, D. A. Fioretto, N. Belabas, S. C. Wein, P. Hilaire, R. Frantzeskakis, M. Gundin, B. Goes, N. Somaschi, M. Morassi, A. Lemaˆ ıtre, I. Sagnes, A. Harouri, S. E. Economou, A. Auffeves, O. Krebs, L. Lanco, and P. Senellart. High-rate entanglement between a semiconductor ...

    2023

  23. [31]

    Y. Chen, M. Zopf, R. Keil, F. Ding, and O. G. Schmidt. Highly-efficient extraction of entangled photons from quantum dots using a broadband optical antenna. Nat Commun 9, 1 2994 (2018)

    2018

  24. [32]

    J. Liu, R. Su, Y. Wei, B. Yao, S. F. C. d. Silva, Y. Yu, J. Iles-Smith, K. Srinivasan, A. Rastelli, J. Li, and X. Wang. A solid-state source of strongly entangled photon pairs with high brightness and indistinguishability. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 6 586–593 (2019). 11

    2019

  25. [33]

    Karli, F

    Y. Karli, F. Kappe, V. Remesh, T. K. Bracht, J. M¨ unzberg, S. Covre da Silva, T. Seidelmann, V. M. Axt, A. Rastelli, D. E. Reiter, and G. Weihs. SUPER Scheme in Action: Experimental Demonstration of Red-Detuned Excitation of a Quantum Emitter. Nano Lett. 22, 16 6567–6572 (2022)

    2022

  26. [34]

    Lodahl, S

    P. Lodahl, S. Mahmoodian, and S. Stobbe. Interfacing single photons and single quantum dots with photonic nanostruc- tures. Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 2 347–400 (2015)

    2015

  27. [35]

    Tsuchimoto, Z

    Y. Tsuchimoto, Z. Sun, E. Togan, S. F¨ alt, W. Wegscheider, A. Wallraff, K. Ensslin, A.˙Imamo˘ glu, and M. Kroner. Large- bandwidth Transduction Between an Optical Single Quantum Dot Molecule and a Superconducting Resonator. PRX Quantum 3, 3 030336 (2022)

    2022

  28. [36]

    D. D. B¨ uhler, M. Weiß, A. Crespo-Poveda, E. D. S. Nysten, J. J. Finley, K. M¨ uller, P. V. Santos, M. M. de Lima, and H. J. Krenner. On-chip generation and dynamic piezo-optomechanical rotation of single photons. Nat Commun 13, 1 6998 (2022)

    2022

  29. [37]

    Larocque, M

    H. Larocque, M. A. Buyukkaya, C. Errando-Herranz, S. Harper, J. Carolan, C.-M. Lee, C. J. K. Richardson, G. L. Leake, D. J. Coleman, M. L. Fanto, E. Waks, and D. Englund. Tunable quantum emitters on large-scale foundry silicon photonics (2023). ArXiv:2306.06460 [physics, physi...

    2023

  30. [38]

    Schuetz, E

    M. Schuetz, E. Kessler, G. Giedke, L. Vandersypen, M. Lukin, and J. Cirac. Universal Quantum Transducers Based on Surface Acoustic Waves. Phys. Rev. X 5, 3 031031 (2015)

    2015

  31. [39]

    Weiß and H

    M. Weiß and H. J. Krenner. Interfacing quantum emitters with propagating surface acoustic waves. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 51, 37 373001 (2018)

    2018

  32. [40]

    Maity, L

    S. Maity, L. Shao, S. Bogdanovi´ c, S. Meesala, Y.-I. Sohn, N. Sinclair, B. Pingault, M. Chalupnik, C. Chia, L. Zheng, K. Lai, and M. Lonˇ car. Coherent acoustic control of a single silicon vacancy spin in diamond. Nat Commun 11, 1 193 (2020)

    2020

  33. [41]

    Kettler, N

    J. Kettler, N. Vaish, L. M. de L´ epinay, B. Besga, P.-L. de Assis, O. Bourgeois, A. Auff` eves, M. Richard, J. Claudon, J.-M. G´ erard, B. Pigeau, O. Arcizet, P. Verlot, and J.-P. Poizat. Inducing micromechanical motion by optical excitation of a single quantum dot. Nat. Nano...

    2020

  34. [42]

    D. M. Lukin, A. D. White, R. Trivedi, M. A. Guidry, N. Morioka, C. Babin, O. O. Soykal, J. Ul-Hassan, N. T. Son, T. Ohshima, P. K. Vasireddy, M. H. Nasr, S. Sun, J.-P. W. MacLean, C. Dory, E. A. Nanni, J. Wrachtrup, F. Kaiser, and J. Vuˇ ckovi´ c. Spectrally reconfigurable qua...

    2020

  35. [43]

    Wigger, M

    D. Wigger, M. Weiß, M. Lienhart, K. M¨ uller, J. J. Finley, T. Kuhn, H. J. Krenner, and P. Machnikowski. Resonance- fluorescence spectral dynamics of an acoustically modulated quantum dot. Phys. Rev. Research 3, 3 033197 (2021)

    2021

  36. [44]

    Imany, Z

    P. Imany, Z. Wang, R. A. DeCrescent, R. C. Boutelle, C. A. McDonald, T. Autry, S. Berweger, P. Kabos, S. W. Nam, R. P. Mirin, and K. L. Silverman. Quantum phase modulation with acoustic cavities and quantum dots. Optica 9, 5 501 (2022)

    2022

  37. [45]

    R. A. DeCrescent, Z. Wang, P. Imany, R. C. Boutelle, C. A. McDonald, T. Autry, J. D. Teufel, S. W. Nam, R. P. Mirin, and K. L. Silverman. Large Single-Phonon Optomechanical Coupling Between Quantum Dots and Tightly Confined Surface Acoustic Waves in the Quantum Regime. Phys. R...

    2022

  38. [46]

    T. Hahn, D. Groll, H. J. Krenner, T. Kuhn, P. Machnikowski, and D. Wigger. Photon scattering from a quantum acoustically modulated two-level system. AVS Quantum Science 4, 1 011403 (2022)

    2022

  39. [47]

    Z. Wang, R. A. DeCrescent, P. Imany, J. T. Bush, D. V. Reddy, S. W. Nam, R. P. Mirin, and K. L. Silverman. Gated InAs quantum dots embedded in surface acoustic wave cavities for low-noise optomechanics (2023). ArXiv:2312.10215 [physics, physics:quant-ph]

    2023

  40. [48]

    Spinnler, G

    C. Spinnler, G. N. Nguyen, Y. Wang, L. Zhai, A. Javadi, M. Erbe, S. Scholz, A. D. Wieck, A. Ludwig, P. Lodahl, L. Midolo, and R. J. Warburton. A single-photon emitter coupled to a phononic-crystal resonator in the resolved-sideband regime (2023). ArXiv:2311.05342 [cond-mat, ph...

    2023

  41. [49]

    S. D. Patel, K. Parto, M. Choquer, N. Lewis, S. Umezawa, L. Hellman, D. Polishchuk, and G. Moody. Surface Acoustic Wave Cavity Optomechanics with Atomically Thin h-BN and WSe 2 Single-Photon Emitters. PRX Quantum 5, 1 010330 (2024)

    2024

  42. [50]

    B. A. McCullian, V. Sharma, H. Y. Chen, J. C. Crossman, E. J. Mueller, and G. D. Fuchs. Coherent Acoustic Control of Defect Orbital States in the Strong-Driving Limit (2024). ArXiv:2403.10989 [cond-mat, physics:quant-ph]

    2024

  43. [51]

    O. D. D. Couto, S. Lazi´ c, F. Iikawa, J. A. H. Stotz, U. Jahn, R. Hey, and P. V. Santos. Photon anti-bunching in acoustically pumped quantum dots. Nature Photon 3, 11 645–648 (2009)

    2009

  44. [52]

    Metcalfe, S

    M. Metcalfe, S. M. Carr, A. Muller, G. S. Solomon, and J. Lawall. Resolved Sideband Emission of InAs / GaAs Quantum Dots Strained by Surface Acoustic Waves. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 3 037401 (2010)

    2010

  45. [53]

    D. A. Golter, T. Oo, M. Amezcua, I. Lekavicius, K. A. Stewart, and H. Wang. Coupling a Surface Acoustic Wave to an Electron Spin in Diamond via a Dark State. Phys. Rev. X 6, 4 041060 (2016)

    2016

  46. [54]

    T. Aref, P. Delsing, M. K. Ekstr¨ om, A. F. Kockum, M. V. Gustafsson, G. Johansson, P. J. Leek, E. Magnusson, and R. Manenti. Quantum Acoustics with Surface Acoustic Waves. In R. H. Hadfield and G. Johansson, editors,Superconducting Devices in Quantum Optics , Quantum Science ...

    2016

  47. [55]

    Kuniej, M

    M. Kuniej, M. Gawe lczyk, and P. Machnikowski. Hybrid acousto-optical swing-up preparation of exciton and biexciton states in a quantum dot (2024). ArXiv:2402.07887 [cond-mat, physics:quant-ph]

    2024

  48. [56]

    Reigue, R

    A. Reigue, R. Hostein, and V. Voliotis. Resonance fluorescence of a single semiconductor quantum dot: the impact of a fluctuating electrostatic environment. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 34, 11 113001 (2019). 12

    2019

  49. [57]

    H¨ ogele, S

    A. H¨ ogele, S. Seidl, M. Kroner, K. Karrai, R. J. Warburton, B. D. Gerardot, and P. M. Petroff. Voltage-Controlled Optics of a Quantum Dot. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 21 217401 (2004)

    2004

  50. [58]

    M. C. L¨ obl, I. S¨ ollner, A. Javadi, T. Pregnolato, R. Schott, L. Midolo, A. V. Kuhlmann, S. Stobbe, A. D. Wieck, P. Lodahl, A. Ludwig, and R. J. Warburton. Narrow optical linewidths and spin pumping on charge-tunable close-to-surface self- assembled quantum dots in an ultra...

    2017

  51. [59]

    Matthiesen, A

    C. Matthiesen, A. N. Vamivakas, and M. Atat¨ ure. Subnatural Linewidth Single Photons from a Quantum Dot. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 9 093602 (2012)

    2012

  52. [60]

    A. V. Kuhlmann, J. H. Prechtel, J. Houel, A. Ludwig, D. Reuter, A. D. Wieck, and R. J. Warburton. Transform-limited single photons from a single quantum dot. Nat Commun 6, 1 8204 (2015)

    2015

  53. [61]

    A. V. Kuhlmann, J. Houel, A. Ludwig, L. Greuter, D. Reuter, A. D. Wieck, M. Poggio, and R. J. Warburton. Charge noise and spin noise in a semiconductor quantum device. Nature Phys 9, 9 570–575 (2013)

    2013

  54. [62]

    M. Weiß, D. Wigger, M. N¨ agele, K. M¨ uller, J. J. Finley, T. Kuhn, P. Machnikowski, and H. J. Krenner. Optomechanical wave mixing by a single quantum dot. Optica 8, 3 291 (2021)

    2021

  55. [63]

    S. M. Meenehan, J. D. Cohen, S. Gr¨ oblacher, J. T. Hill, A. H. Safavi-Naeini, M. Aspelmeyer, and O. Painter. Silicon optomechanical crystal resonator at millikelvin temperatures. Phys. Rev. A 90, 1 011803 (2014)

    2014

  56. [64]

    N. Tomm, A. Javadi, N. O. Antoniadis, D. Najer, M. C. L¨ obl, A. R. Korsch, R. Schott, S. R. Valentin, A. D. Wieck, A. Ludwig, and R. J. Warburton. A bright and fast source of coherent single photons. Nat. Nanotechnol. (2021). 13 SUPPLEMENT AR Y INFORMA TION: COHERENT CONTROL ...

    2021

  57. [65]

    General description Our system comprises a two-level system (TLS) with frequency ωQD driven at optical frequency ωpump with an amplitude described by the coupling (Rabi) rate Ω 0

    SYSTEM HAMIL TONIAN A. General description Our system comprises a two-level system (TLS) with frequency ωQD driven at optical frequency ωpump with an amplitude described by the coupling (Rabi) rate Ω 0. The TLS frequency is modulated at microwave frequency ωSA W with a modulat...

  58. [66]

    The vertical structure consists essentially of a p-i-n diode above a distributed Bragg reflector (DBR) comprising 22 pairs of alternating AlAs/GaAs layers

    SAMPLE F ABRICA TION Our devices are fabricated on InAs quantum dot (QD) samples grown by molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) on a commercial GaAs wafer. The vertical structure consists essentially of a p-i-n diode above a distributed Bragg reflector (DBR) comprising 22 pairs of alte...

  59. [67]

    resonant

    EXPERIMENT AL SETUP All of our QD optical measurements were performed using a 5 K optical cryostat with an internal cryogenic 0.81 NA objective. Nonresonant and resonant pump beams were shaped outside the cryostat using single-mode optical fiber components and free-space optic...

  60. [68]

    Maximum counts

    ESTIMA TING QD OCCUP ANCIES FROM EXPERIMENT AL TIME-DOMAIN DA T A QD occupancies were derived by comparing count rates from time-resolved QD luminescence data to a reference count rate. The reference count rate was derived by performing a set of time-resolved QD luminescence m...

Pith tools

Reviewed May 24, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.