REVIEW 2 cited by
Leapfrogging Sycamore: Harnessing 1432 GPUs for 7$\times$ Faster Quantum Random Circuit Sampling
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Random quantum circuit sampling serves as a benchmark to demonstrate quantum computational advantage. Recent progress in classical algorithms, especially those based on tensor network methods, has significantly reduced the classical simulation time and challenged the claim of the first-generation quantum advantage experiments. However, in terms of generating uncorrelated samples, time-to-solution, and energy consumption, previous classical simulation experiments still underperform the \textit{Sycamore} processor. Here we report an energy-efficient classical simulation algorithm, using 1432 GPUs to simulate quantum random circuit sampling which generates uncorrelated samples with higher linear cross entropy score and is 7 times faster than \textit{Sycamore} 53 qubits experiment. We propose a post-processing algorithm to reduce the overall complexity, and integrated state-of-the-art high-performance general-purpose GPU to achieve two orders of lower energy consumption compared to previous works. Our work provides the first unambiguous experimental evidence to refute \textit{Sycamore}'s claim of quantum advantage, and redefines the boundary of quantum computational advantage using random circuit sampling.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Efficient classical simulation of large-scale unitary cluster Jastrow circuits
A one-layer UCJ quantum chemistry circuit can have its energy computed classically in O(N^7) time, so single-layer UCJ circuits cannot provide quantum advantage for energy estimation.
-
A brief history of quantum vs classical computational advantage
A single-author review of all quantum computational advantage claims to date, their classical refutations, and the progress of quantum error correction.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.