Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Performance-driven Computational Design of Multi-terminal Compositionally Graded Alloy Structures using Graphs

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A single graph problem designs a compositionally graded turbine blade, joining three specialized alloys through BCC-safe intermediate compositions.

desk verdict A well-documented computational integration with a load-bearing gap: phase safety is checked at grid nodes, not along gradient edges, so the single-phase BCC manufacturability claim is not yet established. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.03674 v1 pith:2OSPZ7W4 submitted 2024-12-04 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Marshall D. Allen , Vahid Attari , Brent Vela , James Hanagan , Richard Malak , Raymundo Arróyave This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords compositionallygradedalloysmulti-terminalCGAdesignSteinertreeproblemlabeledpropertygraphsrefractoryCALPHADadditivemanufacturinggasturbineblade
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper integrates three computational building blocks into one pipeline for compositionally graded alloys (CGAs): a labeled property graph of the alloy composition space, a Steiner-tree formulation that connects any number of terminal alloy compositions, and an algorithm that conformally maps the resulting composition tree onto a 3D part. The demonstration is a gas turbine blade in the Cr–Nb–V–W–Zr system with three terminal alloys, each chosen for a different local requirement: surface oxidation resistance, base fatigue resistance, and interior creep resistance. The paper claims that the final monolith realizes a combination of high-temperature properties that no single alloy composition in the dataset provides, while every composition used in the gradient is predicted to be single-phase BCC and the worst-case cracking susceptibility is minimized. If correct, the work moves CGA design from two-terminal path planning to arbitrary multi-terminal structural design, and from manual trial-and-error to a graph-based search over the feasible composition space.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the graph representation plus three algorithms. First, the ATLAS materials graph is a labeled property graph in which nodes are discrete alloy compositions and edges are composition pairs assumed joinable in a gradient, turning the continuous composition space into a discrete searchable topology. Second, the multi-terminal CGA problem is posed as a minimum Steiner tree problem in graphs, with the terminal alloys as fixed nodes and edge cost equal to the integrated normalized Kou cracking criterion with exponent $P=3$; the solver returns the tree $\tau_{\mathrm{CGA}}$ of intermediate compositions. Third, the TreeMAP algorithm takes that tree, a discretized part graph whose nodes are voxels, and a 'coalescent material' parameter $m_c$, propagates material labels outward from the terminals so adjacent voxels get compositionally adjacent alloys, and fills the remaining space with $m_c$. The voxel dimensions are matched to the reported hatch spacing and layer resolution of a real directed-energy-deposition machine, so the discretization is meant to correspond to what the printer can actually deposit.

What would settle it

Deposit or simulate a linear composition gradient across one edge of the reported Steiner tree, for example between Cr30V45W25 and Cr30V50W20, and measure the phases at intermediate compositions; if a non-BCC or brittle phase appears before solidification completes anywhere along that edge, the paper's claim that the mapped gradient is single-phase BCC throughout fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that a multi-terminal compositionally graded structure can be designed as one graph problem and then placed into arbitrary 3D geometry. The authors sample the Cr–Nb–V–W–Zr composition space at 5 mol% steps, build an ATLAS materials graph whose nodes are discrete alloys and whose edges join compositions assumed connectable in a gradient, and filter nodes to those predicted to form a single BCC phase and to satisfy global strength and creep constraints. The filtered graph is partitioned into connected subgraphs, so any two terminal alloys chosen from the same subgraph are guaranteed to have a feasible gradient between them. Three terminals are then selected for localized objectives: high Cr for oxidation resistance, high Pugh ratio with high yield strength for fatigue resistance, and high creep merit with high yield strength for creep resistance. A Steiner-tree solver with a cost function that penalizes the worst-case normalized Kou cracking criterion connects these terminals through intermediate BCC compositions, and the TreeMAP algorithm assigns each composition to voxels of a discretized turbine blade, using the creep-resistant terminal as the default filler. The result is a design whose property distribution, the paper argues, is not attainable by any single alloy in the dataset.

Load-bearing premise

The design assumes that any two alloy compositions separated by one 5 mol% grid step can be joined in a gradient without forming a harmful phase, yet phase safety is only verified at the node compositions, never along the edge between them.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A designer can specify any number of terminal alloys rather than just two, and the Steiner-tree formulation returns a single connected composition tree that satisfies the phase and property constraints.
  • Because the feasible space is partitioned into connected subgraphs before optimization, the method can guarantee that a manufacturable gradient exists between chosen terminal alloys, assuming the node-level phase and property filters are correct.
  • The pipeline is not tied to turbine-blade geometry or to the Cr–Nb–V–W–Zr chemistry: the graph construction, Steiner-tree step, and TreeMAP mapping transfer to other alloy systems and other monolithic structures.
  • The reported quantitative design targets—yield strength never below 167 MPa, creep merit above 45.4 m$^{-2}$s, and worst-case cracking criterion $K_{\mathrm{ou}}'=0.066$ along the tree—are outputs of the integrated pipeline and are the numbers experimental follow-up should check.
  • If the phase filters and edge-joinability assumption hold, the resulting blade is a monolithically printable component with oxidation-resistant surface, fatigue-resistant base, and creep-resistant interior, replacing what would otherwise require multiple alloys joined by welds or fasteners.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An implicit consequence is that the same Steiner-tree machinery could design gradients that branch inside a part, not only at terminal regions, which points toward structures such as graded lattice cores with several functional surfaces.
  • A testable extension is to replace the 'joinable if one grid step apart' rule with edge-level phase calculations or printed-coupon experiments; if every edge of the reported tree passes such a check, the paper's central claim becomes materially stronger.
  • The exponent $P$ in the cracking-susceptibility cost function is a user choice, so one could tune it against measured crack densities in printed gradients to learn whether the predicted worst-case $K_{\mathrm{ou}}'$ ranking actually predicts which gradients crack first.
  • Because the voxel resolution is tied to a specific printer's resolution, the method implies a direct trade-off: a finer-resolution machine could place the same 18-node gradient in a smaller physical region, changing where the less-optimized intermediate alloys sit.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper presents an integrated computational workflow for the design of multi-terminal compositionally graded alloys (CGAs) and demonstrates it on a gas turbine blade in the Cr-Nb-V-W-Zr system. The authors build an ATLAS materials graph from a 0.05 mole-fraction simplicial grid, filter nodes by CALPHAD equilibrium and Scheil-Gulliver predictions of single-phase BCC behavior and by global property thresholds, partition the graph into connected subgraphs, select three terminal alloys by optimizing localized objectives, solve a Steiner tree problem with a cost function that integrates the deep-learning-predicted Kou cracking criterion along edges, and map the resulting tree onto a voxelized blade geometry using the TreeMAP algorithm. The final design places an oxidation-resistant Cr-rich alloy on the surface, a high-yield-strength alloy in the base, and a creep-resistant alloy in the core, connected by a compositionally graded tree. The authors claim that this combination of properties is unattainable with any single alloy and that the Steiner-tree adjacency guarantees single-phase BCC materials throughout the part.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper makes a useful methodological contribution: it extends CGA design from two-terminal paths to multi-terminal tree structures and integrates material selection, gradient design, and conformal geometric mapping in a single pipeline. The demonstration on a realistic 2.49-million-voxel blade geometry with a reported runtime of 38 seconds is a concrete and valuable proof of concept. The paper is also transparent about data availability (Zenodo dataset) and uses established open libraries (NetworkX, PyVista, Thermo-Calc). The main strength is the clear formalization of the multi-terminal CGA problem as a Steiner tree problem, which is a natural and elegant generalization. However, the validity of the physical guarantees rests on an assumption—that adjacent grid nodes can be joined by a manufacturable gradient—that is not verified at edge interiors, and the property claims inherit the accuracy of the machine-learning models without uncertainty quantification.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 2.2 and Methods 3.5.1] The manuscript's central physical guarantee—that 'the materials in the part follow the adjacency required by the Steiner tree to ensure single BCC phases'—is not supported by the calculations reported. Phase filtering (Section 3.2) and property constraints are applied only to the 10,626 nodal compositions; the JOIN_STO edges are included on the assumption that 'in a simplicial grid of alloy compositions, those separated by one grid step could be joined to one another' (Methods 3.5.1). No equilibrium or Scheil-Gulliver phase calculation is reported for intermediate compositions along any edge of \tau_{CGA}, and the edge cost function in Section 3.5.2 interpolates Kou' for cracking susceptibility, not for phase stability. Because every edge in the gradient is a real compositional transition in the manufactured part, one edge passing through a brittle intermetallic or second-phase region invalidates the single-phase BCC and crack-resistant claims. The authors should verify the edge interiors with CALPHAD or Scheil-Gulliver calculations (or experimental evidence) and report those results, or explicitly weaken the claim to nodal feasibility.
  2. [Section 3.5.2 and Fig. 6] The cost function used for the Steiner tree minimization is built from Kou' values predicted by the deep-learning model on interpolated edge compositions, and the same model is used to report the properties of the final design. While the parity plots in Fig. 6 show good agreement at training/test nodes, no uncertainty quantification or validation is provided for the edge-interior predictions, which are the very points used in Eq. (8). Since the design's manufacturability argument depends on low cracking susceptibility along edges, the paper should report the edge-level Kou' values for the selected tree, their prediction intervals, or an independent CALPHAD-based Kou calculation along the chosen edges.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 2.1.1] The heading contains a stray space ('T erminal') and the text uses 'M aterialID' with spacing artifacts; please clean up the formatting throughout.
  2. [References [42]] The GrabCAD model is noted as no longer available; consider providing a persistent archive or the original file name to support reproducibility of the geometric demonstration.
  3. [Table 1] Table 1 lists Kou' values for the nodes but not for the edges; reporting the worst-case edge value (or a range) would directly support the cost-function claim and make the edge-level behavior of the final tree transparent.
  4. [Section 2.2] The statement that the resulting property combination 'would not be possible' with a single alloy is asserted rather than demonstrated; a Pareto-front analysis over the feasible nodal compositions would provide a quantitative baseline for this comparison.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the pipeline's phase and property guarantees are explicit construction constraints, and its improvement claims are model-based optimization outcomes rather than hidden fits.

full rationale

The derivation chain is: sample compositions at 5 mol% grid; compute CALPHAD/Scheil phase behavior, physical property models, and a deep-learned surrogate; filter nodes to single-phase BCC and property constraints; build the ATLAS materials graph with JOIN_STO edges between one-step neighbors; pick terminal alloys by constrained optimization; solve a Steiner tree with a Kou-criterion cost; and map via TreeMAP to voxels. Each step is either an explicit constraint, an optimization objective, or a graph algorithm with no hidden fitted output. The statements that the gradient 'is composed of single-phase BCC alloys' and follows Steiner-tree adjacency are direct consequences of filtering nodes before tree construction; the paper says 'As a result of the graph construction,' so this is a designed guarantee, not a prediction secretly identical to an input. Terminal-alloy properties are evaluated with the same Maresca-Curtin yield-strength, Pugh-ratio, and Reed creep models used in the optimization; this is a self-consistent model pipeline rather than a circular derivation, because those models are external (refs. 37, 41, 57) and the deep-learning surrogate is validated on a held-out test split (Fig. 6). The cost function minimizing worst-case Kou' is the objective, and reporting Kou'=0.066 is reporting the optimization outcome, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The genuine weakness is that JOIN_STO edges are assumed joinable by the explicit statement in Section 3.5.1, and phase stability is checked only at node compositions, not along the 5 mol% edges; this is an unvalidated modeling assumption and a correctness risk for the 'single BCC phases throughout the gradient' claim, but it is not circular because the edge-joinability assumption is an input, not a conclusion derived from the target claim. Self-citations to ATLAS and TreeMAP are used as component methods rather than as a uniqueness theorem or as justification for the physical claims, and the methods are described in the text; this does not make the derivation circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The design depends on a chain of modeling choices: CALPHAD phase stability, Scheil-Gulliver solidification, Maresca-Curtin yield strength, Pugh ratio by rule of mixtures, a deep-learning surrogate, and the grid-edge joinability assumption. No new physical entities are introduced. The most fragile entries are grid-edge joinability (Section 3.5.1) and the surrogate model's extrapolation to interpolated edge compositions.

free parameters (6)
  • Cost function exponent P = 3
    Hand-selected in Eq. 8 to balance worst-case Kou' versus path length; the paper states P>3 over-prioritized granular improvements, so P is tuned by the authors.
  • Simplicial grid spacing = 0.05 mole fraction
    Chosen sampling resolution in Section 3.1; defines which compositions are neighbors and therefore determines all potential gradient edges.
  • Global property thresholds (25th and 95th percentiles) = sigma_y > 167 MPa, Mcreep > 45.43 m^-2s, sigma_y > 771 MPa
    Design constraints defined in Section 2.1 from property distributions; not fitted to an external objective but user-chosen and load-bearing for terminal alloy selection.
  • Edge interpolation step for cost function = 0.1 mole percent
    Step size used to interpolate compositions and evaluate Eq. 8 (Methods 3.5.2); affects numerical cost values and hence tree selection.
  • TreeMAP coalescent material parameter mc = xC, MaterialID 2840
    User-specified parameter in Section 3.8.3; determines the alloy that fills all unlabeled voxels and therefore the spatial extent of each gradient layer.
  • Terminal placement offsets = z > -3, z < -3, 16-edge distance
    Ad hoc geometric placement rules in Section 3.8.2 that determine where xA and xB are seeded in the voxelized blade, directly shaping the final composition map.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Thermo-Calc TCHEA6 database provides acceptably accurate equilibrium phase predictions for the Cr-Nb-V-W-Zr system.
    Invoked in Methods 3.2.1; the paper justifies TCHEA6 by extrapolating from a TCHEA4 benchmark in ref [50], but no direct benchmark of TCHEA6 for this system is provided.
  • domain assumption Scheil-Gulliver solidification model (complete liquid mixing, no solid diffusion) predicts final phases relevant to AM solidification.
    Used in Methods 3.2.2 to screen for >99 at% BCC and to compute Kou criterion; this is a standard but approximate solidification model.
  • ad hoc to paper Compositions separated by one grid step (0.05 mole fraction) can be joined in a gradient if both endpoint compositions are feasible single-phase BCC.
    Methods 3.5.1 explicitly assumes this; no phase calculations or experiments along the edge are reported, so every gradient in the Steiner tree inherits this assumption.
  • domain assumption Maresca-Curtin yield strength model with rule-of-mixtures elastic constants and Taylor factor M=3 gives valid high-temperature yield strengths for these BCC alloys.
    Methods 3.3.2; model is from literature but parameters (M=3, strain rates) are applied without uncertainty quantification.
  • domain assumption The deep-learning regression model trained in prior work generalizes to the compositions used here and to interpolated edge compositions.
    Methods 3.4; used for imputation and for all edge Kou' costs in Eq. 8; parity plots show fit quality but no error bars propagate into the optimization.
  • domain assumption Oxidation resistance can be represented by Cr content via stability of Cr2O3 layers.
    Results Section 2.1 and Eq. 1; authors explicitly acknowledge this simplification is not a rigorous oxidation metric.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Performance-driven Computational Design of Multi-terminal Compositionally Graded Alloy Structures using Graphs." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2OSPZ7W4

@misc{pith2026241203674,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Performance-driven Computational Design of Multi-terminal Compositionally Graded Alloy Structures using Graphs},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2OSPZ7W4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.03674}
}
read the original abstract

The spatial control of material placement afforded by metal additive manufacturing (AM) has enabled significant progress in the development and implementation of compositionally graded alloys (CGAs) for spatial property variation in monolithic structures. However, cracking and brittle phase formation have hindered CGA development, with limited research extending beyond materials design to structural design. Notably, the high-dimensional alloy design space (systems with more than three active elements) remains poorly understood, specifically for CGAs. As a result, many prior efforts take a trial-and-error approach. Additionally, current structural design methods are inadequate for joining dissimilar alloys. In light of these challenges, recent work in graph information modeling and design automation has enabled topological partitioning and analysis of the alloy design space, automated design of multi-terminal CGAs, and automated conformal mapping of CGAs onto corresponding structural geometries. In comparison, prior gradient design approaches are limited to two-terminal CGAs. Here, we integrate these recent advancements, demonstrating a unified performance-driven CGA design approach on a gas turbine blade with broader application to other material systems and engineering structures.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. TOBACO: Topology Optimization via Band-limited Coordinate Networks for Compositionally Graded Alloys

    cs.CE 2025-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    TOBACO maps a composition-gradation manufacturing limit to a neural-network bandwidth via Bernstein's inequality, making the constraint implicit in the design representation.

  2. On-the-Fly Path Planning for the Design of Compositional Gradients in High Dimensions

    physics.comp-ph 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A direct-sampling path planner with a 'bad phase purge' transformation finds CALPHAD-valid composition gradients in 5 to 9 element systems using orders of magnitude fewer thermodynamic calculations than surrogate modeling.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    C., Bhattacharyya, D., Banerjee, S

    Banerjee, R., Collins, P. C., Bhattacharyya, D., Banerjee, S. & Fraser, H. L. Microstructural evolution in laser deposited compositionally graded α/β titanium-vanadium alloys. Acta Materialia 51, 3277–3292 (2003)

    work page 2003

  2. [2]

    C., Banerjee, R., Banerjee, S

    Collins, P. C., Banerjee, R., Banerjee, S. & Fraser, H. L. Laser deposition of compositionally graded titanium–vanadium and titanium–molybdenum alloys. Materials Science and Engineering: A 352, 118–128 (2003)

    work page 2003

  3. [3]

    Bobbio, L. D. et al. Additive manufacturing of a functionally graded mate- rial from Ti-6Al-4V to Invar: Experimental characterization and thermodynamic calculations. Acta Materialia 127, 133–142 (2017)

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    Bobbio, L. D. et al. Characterization of a functionally graded material of Ti-6Al- 4V to 304L stainless steel with an intermediate V section. Journal of Alloys and Compounds 742, 1031–1036 (2018)

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Wang, J. et al. Characterization of wire arc additively manufactured titanium aluminide functionally graded material: Microstructure, mechanical properties and oxidation behaviour. Materials Science and Engineering: A 734, 110–119 (2018)

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Rodrigues, T. A. et al. Steel-copper functionally graded material produced by twin-wire and arc additive manufacturing (T-W AAM). Materials & Design 213, 110270 (2022). 25

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    J., Sajja Rama, K

    John, D. J., Sajja Rama, K. R., Adhimoolam, L. K. & Amalraj, J. Studies on In Situ Alloy Formation Using Mild Steel–Inconel 625 Twin Filler Wire Gas Tungsten Arc Weld Deposition. Engineering Proceedings 61, 28 (2024)

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    R., Lesko, C

    Walker, J., Middendorf, J. R., Lesko, C. C. & Gockel, J. Multi-material laser pow- der bed fusion additive manufacturing in 3-dimensions. Manufacturing Letters 31, 74–77 (2022)

    work page 2022

Show all 66 references
  1. [9]

    Wei, F. et al. Compositionally graded AlxCoCrFeNi high-entropy alloy manufac- tured by laser powder bed fusion. Materialia 21, 101308 (2022)

    2022

  2. [10]

    E., Griffiths, R

    Wu, Z., Wilson-Heid, A. E., Griffiths, R. J. & Elton, E. S. A review on experi- mentally observed mechanical and microstructural characteristics of interfaces in multi-material laser powder bed fusion. Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering 9, 1087021 (2023)

    2023

  3. [11]

    Reichardt, A. et al. Advances in additive manufacturing of metal-based functionally graded materials. International Materials Reviews 66, 1–29 (2021)

    2021

  4. [12]

    Hofmann, D. C. et al. Compositionally graded metals: A new frontier of additive manufacturing. Journal of Materials Research 29, 1899–1910 (2014)

    2014

  5. [13]

    D., Otis, R

    Bocklund, B., Bobbio, L. D., Otis, R. A., Beese, A. M. & Liu, Z.-K. Experimental validation of scheil–gulliver simulations for gradient path planning in additively manufactured functionally graded materials. Materialia 11, 100689 (2020). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/scien...

    2020

  6. [14]

    Computational design of additively manufactured functionally graded materials by thermodynamic modeling with uncertainty quantification

    Bocklund, B. Computational design of additively manufactured functionally graded materials by thermodynamic modeling with uncertainty quantification . Ph.D. thesis, The Pennsylvania State University (2021)

    2021

  7. [15]

    Bobbio, L. D. et al. Design of an additively manufactured functionally graded material of 316 stainless steel and Ti-6Al-4V with Ni-20Cr, Cr, and V intermediate compositions. Additive Manufacturing 51, 102649 (2022)

    2022

  8. [16]

    & Beese, A

    Yang, Z., Sun, H., Liu, Z.-K. & Beese, A. M. Design methodology for functionally graded materials: Framework for considering cracking. Additive Manufactur- ing 73, 103672 (2023). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S2214860423002853

    2023

  9. [17]

    Sun, H. et al. Materialsmap: A calphad-based tool to design composition path- ways through feasibility map for desired dissimilar materials, demonstrated with resistance spot welding joining of ag-al-cu. Materialia 36, 102153 (2024). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a...

    2024

  10. [18]

    & Arroyave, R

    Kirk, T., Galvan, E., Malak, R. & Arroyave, R. Computational Design of Gradient Paths in Additively Manufactured Functionally Graded Materials. Journal of 26 Mechanical Design 140 (2018)

    2018

  11. [19]

    & Arroyave, R

    Kirk, T., Malak, R. & Arroyave, R. Computational Design of Compositionally Graded Alloys for Property Monotonicity. Journal of Mechanical Design 143 (2020)

    2020

  12. [20]

    & Varol, H

    Adiyatov, O. & Varol, H. A. Rapidly-exploring random tree based memory effi- cient motion planning. 2013 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation 354–359 (2013)

    2013

  13. [21]

    & Frazzoli, E

    Karaman, S. & Frazzoli, E. Sampling-based algorithms for optimal motion planning. The International Journal of Robotics Research 30, 846–894 (2011)

    2011

  14. [22]

    Eliseeva, O. V. et al. Functionally Graded Materials through robotics-inspired path planning. Materials & Design 182, 107975 (2019)

    2019

  15. [23]

    Kirk, T. Q. Computational Design of Compositionally Graded Alloys . Ph.D. thesis, Texas A&M University, Department of Mechanical Engineering (2020)

    2020

  16. [24]

    & Arroyave, R

    Allen, M., Kirk, T., Malak, R. & Arroyave, R. A Subspace-Inclusive Sampling Method for the Computational Design of Compositionally Graded Alloys.Journal of Mechanical Design 144, 041704 (2022)

    2022

  17. [25]

    G., Cao, Z

    Price, S. G., Cao, Z. & McCue, I. A novel path planning framework for constructing compositional gradients in many-element systems. SMST 2024: Extended Abstracts from the International Conference on Shape Memory and Superelastic Technologies 90–91 (2024). URL https://doi.org/1...

    2024 doi

  18. [26]

    Olson, G. B. Computational design of hierarchically structured materials. Science 277, 1237–1242 (1997). URL https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science. 277.5330.1237

    1997

  19. [27]

    & Malak, R

    Allen, M., Arr´ oyave, R. & Malak, R. A graph database schema for metal addi- tive informatics. Volume 2B: 44th Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (CIE) (2024). URL https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2024-141981

    2024 doi

  20. [28]

    Allen, M. D. Systematic Design of Compositionally Graded Alloys & Structures . Ph.D. thesis, Texas A&M University, Department of Mechanical Engineering (2025)

    2025

  21. [29]

    & Malak, R

    Allen, M., Arr´ oyave, R. & Malak, R. A Graph Algorithm for the Design of Functionally Graded Metal Components. Volume 3A: 50th Design Automation Conference (DAC) (2024). URL https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2024-141977

    2024 doi

  22. [30]

    Dreyfus, S. E. & Wagner, R. A. The steiner problem in graphs. Networks 1, 195–207 (1971). 27

    1971

  23. [31]

    N., Isheim, D., Seidman, D

    Senkov, O. N., Isheim, D., Seidman, D. N. & Pilchak, A. L. Development of a refractory high entropy superalloy. Entropy 18 (2016). URL https://www.mdpi. com/1099-4300/18/3/102

    2016

  24. [32]

    N., Miracle, D

    Senkov, O. N., Miracle, D. B., Chaput, K. J. & Couzinie, J.-P. Development and exploration of refractory high entropy alloys—A review. Journal of Materials Research 33, 3092–3128 (2018)

    2018

  25. [33]

    & Arroyave, R

    Attari, V. & Arroyave, R. Decoding non-linearity and complexity: Deep tabular learning approaches for materials science (2024). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2411.18717. 2411.18717

    2024

  26. [34]

    Bemerkungen zur schichtkristallbildung

    Scheil, E. Bemerkungen zur schichtkristallbildung. International Journal of Mate- rials Research 34, 70–72 (1942). URL https://doi.org/10.1515/ijmr-1942-340303

    1942 doi

  27. [35]

    The quantitative effect of rapid cooling upon the constitution of binary alloys

    Gulliver, G. The quantitative effect of rapid cooling upon the constitution of binary alloys. Journal of the Institute of Metals 9, 120–157 (1913)

    1913

  28. [36]

    A faster approximation algorithm for the Steiner problem in graphs

    Mehlhorn, K. A faster approximation algorithm for the Steiner problem in graphs. Information Processing Letters 27, 125–128 (1988)

    1988

  29. [37]

    & Warnken, N

    Reed, R., Tao, T. & Warnken, N. Alloys-by-design: Application to nickel-based single crystal superalloys. Acta Materialia 57, 5898–5913 (2009). URL https: //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359645409005187

    2009

  30. [38]

    & Khaledi, H

    Rezazadeh Reyhani, M., Alizadeh, M., Fathi, A. & Khaledi, H. Turbine blade temperature calculation and life estimation - a sensitivity analysis. Propulsion and Power Research 2, 148–161 (2013). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S2212540X13000199

    2013

  31. [39]

    Sauceda, D. et al. High throughput exploration of the oxidation landscape in high entropy alloys. Mater. Horiz. 9, 2644–2663 (2022). URL http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1039/D2MH00729K

    2022 doi

  32. [40]

    Hou, J., Wicks, B. J. & Antoniou, R. A. An investigation of fatigue failures of turbine blades in a gas turbine engine by mechanical analysis. Engineering Fail- ure Analysis 9, 201–211 (2002). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S135063070100005X

    2002

  33. [41]

    Pugh, S. XCII. Relations between the elastic moduli and the plastic properties of polycrystalline pure metals. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 45, 823–843 (1954)

    1954

  34. [42]

    Turbine blade

    GrabCAD Community. Turbine blade. https://grabcad.com/library/ gas-turbine-blade-4 (n.d.). Model no longer available. Originally retrieved on July 28, 2024. 28

    2024

  35. [43]

    Sullivan, C. B. & Kaszynski, A. A. PyVista: 3D plotting and mesh analysis through a streamlined interface for the Visualization Toolkit (VTK). Journal of Open Source Software 4, 1450 (2019)

    2019

  36. [44]

    & Lorensen, B

    Schroeder, W., Martin, K. & Lorensen, B. The Visualization Toolkit (4th ed.) (Kitware, Clifton Park, NY, USA, 2006)

    2006

  37. [45]

    Salas, D. et al. Embedding hidden information in additively manufactured met- als via magnetic property grading for traceability. Additive Manufacturing 60, 103261 (2022)

    2022

  38. [46]

    Automated functional grading of materials for directed energy deposition additive manufacturing (2024)

    Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR). Automated functional grading of materials for directed energy deposition additive manufacturing (2024). SBIR Program Topic A244-043, U.S. Army

    2024

  39. [47]

    M., Beese, A

    Krajewski, A. M., Beese, A. M., Reinhart, W. F. & Liu, Z.-K. Efficient generation of grids and traversal graphs in compositional spaces towards exploration and path planning. npj Unconventional Computing 1, 12 (2024)

    2024

  40. [48]

    & Sundman, B

    Andersson, J.-O., Helander, T., H¨ oglund, L., Shi, P. & Sundman, B. Thermo-calc & dictra, computational tools for materials science. Calphad 26, 273–312 (2002)

    2002

  41. [49]

    Thermodynamic database for high entropy alloys (tchea) version 6 (2024)

    Thermo-Calc Software. Thermodynamic database for high entropy alloys (tchea) version 6 (2024). URL https://web.archive.org/web/20230127050814/https:// thermocalc.com/products/databases/high-entropy-alloys/

    2024

  42. [50]

    & Arr´ oyave, R

    Kirk, T., Vela, B., Mehalic, S., Youssef, K. & Arr´ oyave, R. Entropy-driven melting point depression in fcc heas. Scripta Materialia 208, 114336 (2022)

    2022

  43. [51]

    Sheikh, S. et al. Exploring chemistry and additive manufacturing design spaces: a perspective on computationally-guided design of printable alloys. Materials Research Letters 12, 235–263 (2024)

    2024

  44. [52]

    A simple index for predicting the susceptibility to solidification cracking

    Kou, S. A simple index for predicting the susceptibility to solidification cracking. Weld. J 94, 374–388 (2015)

    2015

  45. [53]

    Singh, P. et al. A ductility metric for refractory-based multi-principal-element alloys. Acta Materialia 257, 119104 (2023)

    2023

  46. [54]

    & Zhu, J.-C

    Liu, L., Paudel, R., Liu, Y., Zhao, X.-L. & Zhu, J.-C. Theoretical and Experimen- tal Studies of the Structural, Phase Stability and Elastic Properties of AlCrTiFeNi Multi-Principle Element Alloy. Materials 13, 4353 (2020)

    2020

  47. [55]

    Liu, Y. et al. Theoretical study of the mechanical properties of CrFeCoNiMox (0.1 ≤ x ≤ 0.3) alloys. RSC advances 10, 14080–14088 (2020)

    2020

  48. [56]

    Zhang, H. et al. Elastic properties of AlxCrMnFeCoNi (0 ≤ x ≤ 5) high-entropy alloys from ab initio theory. Acta Materialia 155, 12–22 (2018). 29

    2018

  49. [57]

    & Curtin, W

    Maresca, F. & Curtin, W. A. Mechanistic origin of high strength in refractory bcc high entropy alloys up to 1900k. Acta Materialia 182, 235–249 (2020)

    2020

  50. [58]

    & Curtin, W

    Baruffi, C., Maresca, F. & Curtin, W. Screw vs. edge dislocation strengthening in body-centered-cubic high entropy alloys and implications for guided alloy design. Mrs Communications 12, 1111–1118 (2022)

    2022

  51. [59]

    & Arr´ oyave, R

    Vela, B., Khatamsaz, D., Acemi, C., Karaman, I. & Arr´ oyave, R. Data-augmented modeling for yield strength of refractory high entropy alloys: A bayesian approach. Acta Materialia 261, 119351 (2023)

    2023

  52. [60]

    Acemi, C. et al. Multi-objective, multi-constraint high-throughput design, synthe- sis, and characterization of tungsten-containing refractory multi-principal element alloys. Acta Materialia 120379 (2024)

    2024

  53. [61]

    Coble, R. L. A model for boundary diffusion controlled creep in polycrystalline materials. Journal of Applied Physics 34, 1679–1682 (1963)

    1963

  54. [62]

    Maximally connected component

    Lovrencic, A. Maximally connected component. Dictionary of Algorithms and Data Structures [online] (2020). URL https://xlinux.nist.gov/dads/HTML/ maximallyConnectedComponent.html

    2020

  55. [63]

    & Melville, J

    McInnes, L., Healy, J. & Melville, J. Umap: Uniform manifold approximation and projection for dimension reduction (2020). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1802. 03426. 1802.03426

    2020 arXiv

  56. [64]

    & Arr´ oyave, R

    Vela, B., Hastings, T. & Arr´ oyave, R. Visualizing high entropy alloy spaces: Methods and best practices (2024). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.07681. 2408. 07681

    2024 arXiv

  57. [65]

    A., Schult, D

    Hagberg, A. A., Schult, D. A. & Swart, P. J. Exploring network structure, dynam- ics, and function using NetworkX. Proceedings of the 7th Python in Science Conference (SciPy) 11–16 (2008)

    2008

  58. [66]

    Allen, M. et al. Phase & property data for the nbcrvwzr alloy system (2024). URL https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14220614. [Data set]. Acknowledgments We acknowledge grant number NSF-DGE-1545403 (NSF-NRT: Data-Enabled Discov- ery and Design of Energy Materials, D 3EM ). MA and ...

    2024 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.