REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 37 references
Femtosecond charge and spin dynamics in CoPt alloys
T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read CoPt alloys demagnetize as efficiently as CoPd under a weaker laser pulse, with the effect traced to platinum's stronger spin-orbit coupling.
desk verdict First time-resolved L-edge XMCD in a CoPt alloy at the new FLASH helical afterburner, but the headline 'comparable demagnetization at lower fluence' rests on an assumed 10 nm optical penetration depth that the paper never measures. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The central mechanism is time-resolved X-ray absorption spectroscopy and X-ray magnetic circular dichroism at the Co L3 edge, using circularly polarized soft X-ray pulses from a helical afterburner undulator at a free-electron laser. The pump-probe experiment measures transient XAS and XMCD simultaneously, separating laser-induced electron repopulation near the Fermi level from the spin response. The argument that CoPt demagnetizes more efficiently than CoPd is carried by an extrapolation of the depth-averaged XMCD reduction to the near-surface region within the optical penetration depth, together with comparison to earlier CoPd results.
What would settle it
Measure fluence-dependent XMCD for CoPt and CoPd films of identical thickness and geometry at the same X-ray incidence angle; if CoPt does not reach comparable demagnetization at lower fluence, or if the near-surface demagnetization saturates below 4.2 mJ/cm2, the efficiency claim fails. Directly measuring the optical penetration depth of the CoPt film at 1030 nm would also settle whether the extrapolation is valid.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that a 25 nm Co50Pt50 layer, excited at 4.2 mJ/cm2 with 1030 nm pulses, shows a transient reduction of the Co L3-edge XMCD signal of about 24–30% on a sub-picosecond timescale — comparable to what was reported for CoPd films at pump fluences of 12–35 mJ/cm2. Because the XMCD signal is averaged over the probed depth, the authors estimate by assuming a laser penetration depth of about 10 nm and a linear scaling of the electron-hole density with fluence that the near-surface region is roughly 100% demagnetized. The accompanying transient XAS change, with its zero-crossing near the absorption maximum, matches the lineshape recorded for CoPd and places the Fermi level at the same relative energy. The authors conclude that CoPt is demagnetized more efficiently than CoPd, and they trace this efficiency to stronger valence-band spin-orbit coupling in platinum driving very efficient spin-flip processes.
Load-bearing premise
The claim depends on the assumption that the optical pump light penetrates about 10 nm into the CoPt film and that the resulting electron-hole density scales linearly with fluence, because that is what turns the measured 24–30% depth-averaged XMCD drop into a 100% near-surface demagnetization comparable to CoPd.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- The same degree of demagnetization at lower fluence means that CoPt-based structures could require less optical energy than CoPd-based ones for applications built on ultrafast magnetization control.
- The first femtosecond XMCD operation of the helical afterburner undulator opens the same element-specific pump-probe measurement to the broader soft X-ray free-electron laser community.
- The observed transient XAS lineshape with its zero-crossing near the absorption maximum places the Fermi level in CoPt at the same relative energy as in CoPd, supporting a common electronic-structure response.
- The slower XMCD recovery (2.5 ps) compared to the XAS recovery (0.7 ps) is consistent with electron-phonon equilibration happening before the spin system remagnetizes.
Reading between the lines
- A fluence series on the same CoPt sample could test the linear-scaling assumption directly, and a saturation of demagnetization below 4.2 mJ/cm2 would change how the efficiency comparison is interpreted.
- If the spin-orbit mechanism is generic, similar low-fluence demagnetization should appear in other 3d-5d alloys such as FePt, which could be checked with the same apparatus.
- A thickness series of CoPt films would separate surface and bulk contributions and test the 10 nm penetration-depth assumption without relying on literature values.
- Time-resolved XMCD at the Pt M-edges, or measurement of the transient orbital moment, could verify that angular momentum is indeed leaving the Co sublattice through spin-orbit-coupled channels.
Signed reviews
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper reports time-resolved X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) and X-ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD) measurements at the Co L3 edge of a 25 nm Co50Pt50 alloy, using the newly installed helical afterburner undulator at the FLASH free-electron laser. The authors observe a transient XMCD reduction of 24 ± 9% at 500 fs delay and a small transient XAS change (0.7 ± 0.3% relative to the XAS maximum). They then extrapolate this depth-averaged attenuation to the near-surface region and claim that CoPt demagnetizes comparably to CoPd at a substantially lower optical pump fluence (4.2 mJ/cm2 versus 12–35 mJ/cm2), attributing the apparent efficiency to stronger spin-orbit coupling in Pt compared to Pd. The paper also reports the first time-resolved XMCD measurements at FLASH with the helical afterburner, which is a notable technical milestone.
Significance. If the central claim is robust, the result would be a valuable data point in the ongoing discussion of how spin-orbit coupling controls ultrafast demagnetization in 3d/5d alloys. The demonstration of time-resolved XMCD at FLASH with the helical afterburner extends the capabilities of X-ray free-electron lasers for element-specific magnetization dynamics. However, the efficiency comparison rests on an unmeasured optical penetration depth and on a linear fluence-scaling assumption. Because these assumptions are load-bearing, the quantitative efficiency claim is not yet fully supported. The paper is nevertheless an important experimental step and the technical novelty is solid.
major comments (3)
- [Section IV] The central comparison with CoPd is based on extrapolating the measured 24–30% depth-averaged XMCD attenuation to a near-surface demagnetization using an assumed 10 nm laser penetration depth taken from Ref. [11]. The paper does not report a measurement of the optical absorption length of Co50Pt50 at 1030 nm. As the authors themselves note, this is an estimate; but the headline claim in the abstract and summary depends on it. A sensitivity analysis shows that if the true penetration depth is 20 nm rather than 10 nm, the inferred surface demagnetization drops from roughly 65–82% to 42–53%, which would no longer be comparable to the 60% demagnetization reported for CoPd. The authors should either measure the penetration depth, perform a systematic uncertainty propagation, or substantially temper the efficiency claim.
- [Section IV and Fig. 2] The linear scaling of electron-hole excitation with fluence is asserted without experimental support. The comparison with CoPd at 12 mJ/cm2 and 35 mJ/cm2 assumes that the demagnetization amplitude scales linearly with fluence in the near-surface region, and that the relationship is identical for CoPt and CoPd. If there is saturation or nonlinear absorption at the fluences used, the efficiency comparison is invalid. The authors should discuss the validity of this scaling and ideally present a fluence-dependent measurement of the XMCD attenuation, even at a single time delay, to ground the assumption.
- [Section III.B and Fig. 2b] The transient ΔXAS fit is performed by scaling the ΔXAS lineshape from Ref. [11] (obtained on CoPd) as a fixed template for CoPt, allowing only the amplitude to vary. This assumes the spectral lineshape of the transient response is identical in CoPt and CoPd, despite the paper's own argument that the hybridization and spin-orbit coupling differ substantially between the two systems. That assumption should be justified, or a lineshape-independent analysis should be provided (for example, fitting the zero-crossing energy and the amplitude independently).
minor comments (4)
- [Throughout] Several typos should be corrected: 'measurments' in Section IV, 'dynamcis' in the Section III.C heading, 'dispayed' and 'Contrary tho' and 'suface' in Section IV, and 'radiaton' in Section II.
- [Figure 3 caption and Section III.C] The text states 'solid lines' for the fits in Fig. 3, while the caption refers to 'dashed lines'. Please make the description consistent.
- [Section III.C] The fitting procedure fixes the time constants and only adjusts amplitudes because of noise. This should be stated more prominently in the main text (not only in the figure caption) so that readers can judge the precision of the reported recovery timescales.
- [Section IV] The difference in X-ray incidence angle between the present experiment (35° to the surface normal) and the CoPd measurements in Ref. [11] (normal incidence) is not explicitly addressed. The relative attenuation used for the comparison is independent of this angle, but the authors should state this explicitly to avoid confusion.
Circularity Check
Central XMCD demagnetization comparison is an independent measurement; only the ΔXAS lineshape agreement is imposed by fitting the CoPd template.
-
fitted input called prediction
[Section III.B (Transient-state spectroscopy), Fig. 2b, and repeated in Section V]
"Using the ΔXAS lineshape obtained in Ref. [11] as a fit function (blue solid line in Fig. 2b) we determined the amplitude of the ΔXAS variation across EF to 0.7 ± 0.3 % relative to the XAS maximum in Fig. 2a."
The paper first fits only the amplitude of the CoPt transient ΔXAS using the full spectral lineshape from the CoPd study [11]. It then reports agreement in the zero-crossing/EF position and later summarizes: 'We showed that CoPt alloys display the characteristic transient XAS lineshape upon demagnetization as observed in previous studies for CoPd at LCLS [11].' The zero-crossing and overall shape are inherited from the fit template, so the claimed lineshape agreement is true by construction rather than by independent measurement. This is a genuine but secondary circular step: the central demagnetization claim rests on the directly measured XMCD attenuation, not on the ΔXAS lineshape.
full rationale
The main derivation chain is self-contained: the paper measures ground-state XAS/XMCD at FLASH, validates it against BESSY II, and directly measures a transient XMCD attenuation of 24±9% at 500 fs and 30±3% from the time-delay fit. The subsequent comparison to CoPd is based on external literature values, not on a model that already contains the answer. The near-surface extrapolation to 'roughly 100% demagnetization' using an assumed ~10 nm penetration depth from Ref. [11] is an unverified assumption and a correctness risk, but it is not circular: the measured depth-averaged attenuation is the input, and the CoPd benchmark does not determine the CoPt penetration depth. The only reduction-by-construction step is the ΔXAS lineshape claim: the Ref. [11] lineshape is used as the fit function, so the later statement that CoPt displays the same characteristic lineshape is imposed by the fit. This step does not feed into the central demagnetization comparison, which rests on XMCD, so the paper's main conclusion retains independent experimental content.
Assumptions & free parameters
free parameters (4)
- decay time constant tau_D =
0.3 ps
- recovery time constants tau_R_XAS and tau_R_XMCD =
0.7 ps and 2.5 ps
- laser penetration depth =
about 10 nm
- small intensity offset for FLASH XAS normalization =
not specified
assumptions (4)
- domain assumption The zero-crossing of the transient differential XAS marks the Fermi level (from Ref. [16]).
- domain assumption The XMCD signal is proportional to the projection of the magnetization along the X-ray beam, and its attenuation equals demagnetization.
- ad hoc to paper The transient XAS lineshape measured for CoPd in Ref. [11] is applicable to CoPt with only an amplitude scaling.
- domain assumption The density of photoexcited electron-hole pairs scales linearly with optical pump fluence.
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Femtosecond charge and spin dynamics in CoPt alloys." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PAQOG4DY
@misc{pith2026250202240,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Femtosecond charge and spin dynamics in CoPt alloys},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PAQOG4DY}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.02240}
}
abstract
The use of advanced X-ray sources plays a key role in the study of dynamic processes in magnetically ordered materials. The progress in X-ray free electron lasers enables the direct and simultaneous observation of the femtosecond evolution of electron and spin systems through transient X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) and X-ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD), respectively. Such experiments allow us to resolve the response seen in the population of the spin-split valence states upon optical excitation. Here, we utilize circularly polarized ultrashort soft X-ray pulses from the new helical afterburner undulator at the free-electron laser FLASH in Hamburg to study the femtosecond dynamics of a laser-excited CoPt alloy at the Co $L_{3}$ absorption edge. Despite employing a weaker electronic excitation level we find a comparable demagnetization for the Co $3d$-states in CoPt compared to previous measurements on CoPd. This is attributed to distinctly different orbital hybridization and spin-orbit coupling between $3d$ and $4d$ vs. $3d$ and $5d$ elements in the corresponding alloys and multilayers.
Figures
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[11]
State-resolved ultrafast charge and spin dynamics in [Co/Pd] multilayers
L. Le Guyader et al., “State-resolved ultrafast charge and spin dynamics in [Co/Pd] multilayers” Applied Physics Letters 120, 032401 (2022)
work page 2022
-
[1]
Ultrafast Spin Dynamics in Ferromagnetic Nickel
E. Beaurepaire, “Ultrafast Spin Dynamics in Ferromagnetic Nickel” Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4250 (1996)
work page 1996
-
[2]
Perspective: Ultrafast magnetism and THz spintronics
J. Walowski and M. Münzenberg, “Perspective: Ultrafast magnetism and THz spintronics” Journal of Applied Physics 120, 140901 (2016)
work page 2016
-
[3]
I. Radu et al., “Transient ferromagnetic-like state mediating ultrafast reversal of antiferromagnetically coupled spins” Nature 472, 205 (2011)
work page 2011
-
[4]
Ultrafast Optically Induced Ferromagnetic State in an Elemental Antiferromagnet
E. Golias et al., “Ultrafast Optically Induced Ferromagnetic State in an Elemental Antiferromagnet” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 107202 (2021)
work page 2021
-
[5]
Direct versus indirect excitation of ultrafast magnetization dynamics in FeNi alloys
C. von Korff Schmising, S. Jana, O. Zülich, D. Sommer, and S. Eisebitt, “Direct versus indirect excitation of ultrafast magnetization dynamics in FeNi alloys” Phys. Rev. Research 6, 013270 (2024)
work page 2024
-
[6]
All-optical control of ferromagnetic thin films and nanostructures
C.-H. Lambert et al., “All-optical control of ferromagnetic thin films and nanostructures” Science 345, 1337 (2014)
work page 2014
-
[7]
Element-Specific Magnetization Dynamics in Co–Pt Alloys Induced by Strong Optical Excitation
I. Vaskivskyi et al., “Element-Specific Magnetization Dynamics in Co–Pt Alloys Induced by Strong Optical Excitation” J. Phys. Chem. C 125, 11714 (2021). 15
work page 2021
Show all 37 references
-
[8]
Femtosecond modification of electron localization and transfer of angular momentum in nickel
C. Stamm et al., “Femtosecond modification of electron localization and transfer of angular momentum in nickel” Nature Materials 6, 740 (2007)
2007
-
[9]
Distinguishing the ultrafast dynamics of spin and orbital moments in solids
C. Boeglin et al., “Distinguishing the ultrafast dynamics of spin and orbital moments in solids” Nature 465, 458 (2010)
2010
-
[10]
Transient electronic and magnetic structures of nickel heated by ultrafast laser pulses
T. Kachel et al., “Transient electronic and magnetic structures of nickel heated by ultrafast laser pulses” Phys. Rev. B 80, 092404 (2009)
2009
-
[12]
FemtoSpeX: a versatile optical pump–soft X-ray probe facility with 100 fs X-ray pulses of variable polarization
K. Holldack et al., “FemtoSpeX: a versatile optical pump–soft X-ray probe facility with 100 fs X-ray pulses of variable polarization” J. Synchrotron Rad. 21, 1090 (2014)
2014
-
[13]
X-ray free-electron lasers: from dreams to reality
C. Pellegrini, “X-ray free-electron lasers: from dreams to reality” Phys. Scr. 2016, 014004 (2017)
2017
-
[14]
Polarization control in an X-ray free-electron laser
A. A. Lutman et al., “Polarization control in an X-ray free-electron laser” Nature Photon. 10, 468 (2016)
2016
-
[15]
Circular dichroism experiments at the $L$ edge of magnetic transition metals enabled by elliptically polarized pulses from a seeded free-electron laser
C. Spezzani et al., “Circular dichroism experiments at the $L$ edge of magnetic transition metals enabled by elliptically polarized pulses from a seeded free-electron laser” Phys. Rev. B 110,174409 (2024)
2024
-
[16]
Influence of laser-excited electron distributions on the X-ray magnetic circular dichroism spectra: Implications for femtosecond demagnetization in Ni
K. Carva, D. Legut, and P. M. Oppeneer, “Influence of laser-excited electron distributions on the X-ray magnetic circular dichroism spectra: Implications for femtosecond demagnetization in Ni” Europhysics Letters 86, 57002 (2009)
2009
-
[17]
The interplay of local electron correlations and ultrafast spin dynamics in fcc Ni
T. Lojewski et al., “The interplay of local electron correlations and ultrafast spin dynamics in fcc Ni” Materials Research Letters 11, 655 (2023)
2023
-
[18]
Electronic origin of x-ray absorption peak shifts,
S. Shallcross, C. v. K. Schmising, P. Elliott, S. Eisebitt, J. K. Dewhurst, and S. Sharma, “Electronic origin of x-ray absorption peak shifts,” Phys. Rev. B 106, L060302 (2022)
2022
-
[19]
Angular momentum redistribution in laser-induced demagnetization
J. K. Dewhurst, S. Shallcross, P. Elliott, S. Eisebitt, C. v. K. Schmising, and S. Sharma, “Angular momentum redistribution in laser-induced demagnetization” Phys. Rev. B 104, 054438 (2021)
2021
-
[20]
Ultrafast modification of the electronic structure of a correlated insulator
O. Grånäs et al., “Ultrafast modification of the electronic structure of a correlated insulator” Phys. Rev. Res. 4, L032030 (2022)
2022
-
[21]
Operation of a free-electron laser from the extreme ultraviolet to the water window
W. Ackermann et al., “Operation of a free-electron laser from the extreme ultraviolet to the water window” Nature Photon. 1, 336 (2007). 16
2007
-
[22]
Simultaneous operation of two soft x-ray free-electron lasers driven by one linear accelerator
B. Faatz et al., “Simultaneous operation of two soft x-ray free-electron lasers driven by one linear accelerator” New J. Phys. 18, 062002 (2016)
2016
-
[23]
FLASH and the FLASH2020+ project—current status and upgrades for the free-electron laser in Hamburg at DESY
M. Beye et al., “FLASH and the FLASH2020+ project—current status and upgrades for the free-electron laser in Hamburg at DESY” Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 138, 193 (2023)
2023
-
[24]
Double-grating monochromatic beamline with ultrafast response for FLASH2 at DESY
L. Poletto, F. Frassetto, G. Brenner, M. Kuhlmann, and E. Plönjes, “Double-grating monochromatic beamline with ultrafast response for FLASH2 at DESY” J Synchrotron Rad. 25, 131 (2018)
2018
-
[25]
Development of an APPLE-III undulator for FLASH-2
M. Tischer et al., “Development of an APPLE-III undulator for FLASH-2” J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 2380, 012017 (2022)
2022
-
[26]
Normalized single-shot X-ray absorption spectroscopy at a free-electron laser
G. Brenner, S. Dziarzhytski, P. S. Miedema, B. Rösner, C. David, and M. Beye, “Normalized single-shot X-ray absorption spectroscopy at a free-electron laser” Opt. Lett. 44, 2157 (2019)
2019
-
[27]
Shot noise limited soft x-ray absorption spectroscopy in solution at a SASE-FEL using a transmission grating beam splitter
R. Y. Engel et al., “Shot noise limited soft x-ray absorption spectroscopy in solution at a SASE-FEL using a transmission grating beam splitter” Structural Dynamics 8, 014303 (2021)
2021
-
[28]
FLASH2: Operation, beamlines, and photon diagnostics
E. Plönjes, B. Faatz, M. Kuhlmann, and R. Treusch, “FLASH2: Operation, beamlines, and photon diagnostics” AIP Conference Proceedings, 1741, 020008 (2016)
2016
-
[29]
Grating monochromator with ultrafast response for FLASH2 at DESY
G. Brenner, F. Frassetto, M. Kuhlmann, E. Ploenjes, and L. Poletto, “Grating monochromator with ultrafast response for FLASH2 at DESY” in Advances in X-ray Free-Electron Lasers Instrumentation IV, SPIE, 131 (2017)
2017
-
[30]
Explaining the paradoxical diversity of ultrafast laser-induced demagnetization
B. Koopmans et al., “Explaining the paradoxical diversity of ultrafast laser-induced demagnetization” Nature Mater 9, 259 (2010)
2010
-
[31]
Spin-orbit enhanced demagnetization rate in Co/Pt multilayers
K. C. Kuiper; T. Roth; A. J. Schellekens; O. Schmitt; B. Koopmans; M. Cinchetti; M. Aeschlimann, “Spin-orbit enhanced demagnetization rate in Co/Pt multilayers” Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 202402 (2014)
2014
-
[32]
Element-selectively tracking ultrafast demagnetization process in Co/Pt multilayer thin films by the resonant magneto-optical Kerr effect
Kohei Yamamoto, Souliman El Moussaoui, Yasuyuki Hirata, Susumu Yamamoto, Yuya Kubota, Shigeki Owada, Makina Yabashi, Takeshi Seki, Koki Takanashi, Iwao Matsuda, Hiroki Wadati, “Element-selectively tracking ultrafast demagnetization process in Co/Pt multilayer thin films by the...
2020
-
[33]
Element-selective analysis of ultrafast demagnetization in Co/Pt multilayers exhibiting large perpendicular magnetic anisotropy
M. Hennes, G. Lambert, V. Chardonnet, R. Delaunay, G. S. Chiuzbaian, E. Jal, B. Vodungbo, “Element-selective analysis of ultrafast demagnetization in Co/Pt multilayers exhibiting large perpendicular magnetic anisotropy” Appl. Phys. Lett. 120, 072408 (2022)
2022
-
[34]
Element Specificity of Transient Extreme Ultraviolet Magnetic Dichroism
J. K. Dewhurst, F. Willems, P. Elliott, Q. Z. Li, C. von Korff Schmising, C. Strüber, D. W. Engel, S. Eisebitt, S. Sharma, “Element Specificity of Transient Extreme Ultraviolet Magnetic Dichroism” Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 077203 (2020)
2020
-
[35]
Optical inter-site spin transfer probed by energy and spin-resolved transient absorption spectroscopy
F. Willems, C. von Korff Schmising, C. Strüber, et al. “Optical inter-site spin transfer probed by energy and spin-resolved transient absorption spectroscopy” Nat Commun 11, 871 (2020)
2020
-
[36]
Wohlfarth, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 45:365, 647 (1954)
E.P. Wohlfarth, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 45:365, 647 (1954)
1954
-
[37]
Orbital magnetic moments of Co in multilayers with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy
D. Weller, Y. Wu, J. Stöhr, M. G. Samant, B. D. Hermsmeier, C. Chappert, “Orbital magnetic moments of Co in multilayers with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy” Phys. Rev. B 49, 12888 (1994)
1994
Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.