Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.09812 v1 pith:5A24XJXQ submitted 2025-05-14 cs.LG

Comparative Analysis of Stroke Prediction Models Using Machine Learning

classification cs.LG
keywords strokemodelsmachinepredictioncausechallengesclinicaldata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Stroke remains one of the most critical global health challenges, ranking as the second leading cause of death and the third leading cause of disability worldwide. This study explores the effectiveness of machine learning algorithms in predicting stroke risk using demographic, clinical, and lifestyle data from the Stroke Prediction Dataset. By addressing key methodological challenges such as class imbalance and missing data, we evaluated the performance of multiple models, including Logistic Regression, Random Forest, and XGBoost. Our results demonstrate that while these models achieve high accuracy, sensitivity remains a limiting factor for real-world clinical applications. In addition, we identify the most influential predictive features and propose strategies to improve machine learning-based stroke prediction. These findings contribute to the development of more reliable and interpretable models for the early assessment of stroke risk.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.