REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 51 references
Spin-Selective Hadron Spectroscopy via Azimuthal Anisotropies from Entanglement-Enabled Spin Interference
T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-07-12 · grok-4.5
Pith's one-line read Spin-selection rules in azimuthal harmonics separate overlapping resonances that mass spectra alone cannot.
desk verdict Clean spin-selection rule from EESI that turns two degenerate mass fits into falsifiable A_n predictions; quantitative peaks rest on a reusable a_n that is the softest link. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The factorization of each interference term into a Breit-Wigner mass factor times a spin-dependent angular coefficient a_n (Eq. 6), which encodes the selection rule that only amplitudes of the correct spin structure feed a given cos(n Delta phi) harmonic.
What would settle it
Measure A1 and A3 versus dipion mass in the 1.0-1.4 GeV window of existing or Run-3 ultra-peripheral collision data; a null result rules out significant spin-2 (or continuum) contributions, while peaks near 1.27 GeV confirm them.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
The entanglement-enabled spin-interference effect in ultra-peripheral collisions acts as a quantum-mechanical filter: overlap of two distinct spin-1 amplitudes populates only A2, while overlap of a spin-1 amplitude with a spin-2 amplitude generates A1 and A3. Consequently two models that describe the same ALICE pi-plus pi-minus mass spectrum equally well (extra spin-1 rho-prime versus spin-2 f2 plus gamma-gamma continuum) predict identically zero versus clear peaks in the odd harmonics.
Load-bearing premise
Every pair of amplitudes that share the same spin structure is assumed to produce the same numerical strength a_n, so values extracted from the rho can be reused for every other resonance and continuum term.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- Odd harmonics A1 and A3 become a model-independent flag for any even-spin or gamma-gamma amplitude, even when it is buried under photonuclear background.
- The same selection rules can separate scalar and tensor states (f0, a0, glueball candidates) and higher-spin photoproduced mesons in future UPC and EIC data.
- Relative spin-1 versus spin-2 production can be tuned by switching to light-ion collisions, providing an independent cross-check of the filter.
- A2 itself becomes a new observable for studying rho-omega mixing through its angular interference pattern.
Reading between the lines
- Once odd harmonics are measured, their absolute size can be inverted to extract the previously inaccessible gamma-gamma continuum amplitude at low energy, feeding dispersive analyses and chiral perturbation theory.
- The same angular filter should apply to any exclusive final state whose production amplitudes carry different angular-momentum projections, opening a general spectroscopy tool beyond dipions.
- Systematic mapping of a_n across multiple resonances would test whether the common-value assumption holds or whether transverse wave-function differences must be included.
Signed reviews
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper argues that entanglement-enabled spin interference in ultra-peripheral collisions supplies selection rules on the azimuthal harmonics A_n of the cos(nΔϕ) distribution of π⁺π⁻ pairs. Overlap of two distinct spin-1 amplitudes contributes only to A₂, while spin-1–spin-2 interference generates A₁ and A₃. Two models that describe the ALICE PbPb UPC mass spectrum equally well in the 1.0–1.4 GeV region—an extra photonuclear spin-1 ρ′(1450) versus a photon-photon spin-2 f₂(1270) plus γγ continuum—therefore predict identically vanishing versus non-vanishing odd harmonics. The same filter is proposed as a practical route to isolate the γγ→π⁺π⁻ continuum from the dominant photonuclear background.
Significance. If the selection rules hold, the work converts a recently observed quantum-interference effect into a spectroscopic tool that can resolve long-standing spin ambiguities above the ρ⁰ and can flag the presence of even-spin (γγ) amplitudes even when they are buried under photonuclear continuum. The angular-structure derivation (Eqs. 1–6 plus the appendix) is clean, rests on standard EPA and helicity conservation, and yields concrete, falsifiable mass-dependent predictions for A_n that existing or near-term RHIC/LHC data sets can test. The transparent two-hypothesis fits to public ALICE data and the explicit factorization of resonant and angular factors are genuine strengths that make the proposal immediately usable.
major comments (2)
- [Results, after Eq. (6) and Fig. 2] After Eq. (6) the quantitative A_n curves of Fig. 2 rest on the explicit simplification that every pair of amplitudes sharing the same spin structure is assigned the identical numerical coefficient a_n (a₁=0.148, a₂=0.228, a₃=0.022) extracted from ρ⁰ data or the ρ⁰–γγ calculation of Ref. [32]. Differences in transverse wave functions, dipole form factors or production mechanisms for the ρ′, f₂ and continua can change these coefficients by tens of percent. A short sensitivity study that varies a_n within a plausible range (or supplies theoretical estimates for the other states) is required to demonstrate that the Model-B peaks remain experimentally resolvable and that residual odd harmonics stay negligible in pure spin-1 Model A.
- [Results, Eqs. (9)–(10) and Table I] Both mass-spectrum fits (Eqs. 9–10 and Table I) omit the broad ρ″(1700) that ALICE and LHCb observe in the same region and that the authors themselves note would contribute near 1.4 GeV. Its interference with the continuum can shift the extracted amplitudes of the 1.3 GeV feature and therefore alter the predicted A_n shapes (especially the A₂ dilution in Model B). Given the already elevated reduced χ²≈1.7, a fit that includes ρ″ should be shown to confirm that the two spin hypotheses remain indistinguishable in the mass spectrum alone.
minor comments (4)
- [Results, paragraph after Eq. (6)] The numerical values of a₁ and a₃ are taken from an average over 0–0.1 GeV/c of the calculation in Ref. [32]; a one-sentence statement of the precise kinematic cuts and any residual p_T dependence would improve reproducibility.
- [Figs. 1 and 2] Figure captions and legends in the manuscript text are partially garbled (likely a rendering artifact). Ensure that the final figures clearly distinguish the individual Breit-Wigner and continuum components and that the two phase choices for Model B are labeled.
- [Methodology, Eq. (8)] The running-width formula (Eq. 8) uses the conventional (2J+1)/2 power; a brief remark that the same power is applied to both the spin-1 and spin-2 resonances would remove any ambiguity for non-specialist readers.
- [Discussion, penultimate paragraph] In the Discussion the claim that O(10⁷) exclusive dipions will make a few-percent A₁ signal ‘detectable at high significance’ should be accompanied by a rough estimate of the expected statistical uncertainty after typical UPC selection cuts.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity: selection rules follow from polarization contractions; An shapes are constructed from independent mass-fit amplitudes times external a_n, not forced by definition or self-citation.
-
self citation load bearing
[Introduction and Methodology (citations [27–31], [29])]
"The recent observation of entanglement-enabled spin interference (EESI) in UPCs at STAR and ALICE provides a new handle on this problem [27–31]. … Recent work by the STAR and ALICE collaborations [27, 28, 30, 31] have demonstrated a cos(2Δϕ) signal qualitatively consistent with predictions [29, 40]."
The existence of the cos(2Δϕ) modulation is supported in part by papers co-authored by one of the present authors. The citation is not load-bearing for the spin-selection algebra itself (which is re-derived from the polarization products), so the circularity is minor and does not force the central claim.
full rationale
The derivation chain begins from the EPA polarization structure (eqs. 1–4 and the appendix expansions that isolate cos(nΔϕ) terms). Overlap of two spin-1 amplitudes yields only the even harmonic because both factors are of the form (P̂·k̂)(P̂·k̂′); a spin-1 imes spin-2 product yields the odd harmonics because three polarization vectors appear. These selection rules are obtained by direct algebraic expansion and do not rely on any fitted quantity. The subsequent numerical An(M) curves are assembled via the factorized expression (6): the mass-dependent prefactor BW_i BW_j/σ is taken from a conventional Breit-Wigner fit to the azimuthally-integrated ALICE spectrum (an independent observable), while the overall coefficients a_n are imported from separate measurements (a2) or from an external calculation of ρ0–γγ interference (a1,a3). Because the An data themselves are never used in the fit, the procedure is not “fitted input called prediction.” The only mild self-reference is the citation of the co-author’s earlier EESI papers for the existence of the cos(2Δϕ) signal; that citation is not load-bearing for the spin-selection algebra. The universal-a_n reuse is an explicit modeling assumption, not a circular reduction. Consequently the qualitative claim (Model A forces An=0 for n odd; Model B produces peaks) stands on independent content.
Assumptions & free parameters
free parameters (6)
- ρ⁰(770) mass, width, complex amplitude
- ω(782) complex amplitude
- ρ′(1450) mass, width, complex amplitude (Model A)
- f₂(1270) mass, width, complex amplitude (Model B)
- photonuclear continuum B_γA and γγ continuum C_γγ
- a₁ = 0.148, a₂ = 0.228, a₃ = 0.022
assumptions (5)
- domain assumption Equivalent Photon Approximation with linearly polarized quasi-real photons whose transverse momenta are small and aligned with the electric field.
- domain assumption s-channel helicity conservation (or partial SCHC) correlates the vector-meson helicity with the photon helicity.
- domain assumption Eikonal factorization: resonant mass dependence multiplies an angular structure that is independent of invariant mass.
- ad hoc to paper All amplitudes of a given spin structure share a single common a_n value.
- domain assumption Spin-2 states produced in γγ collisions appear only in the ±2 helicity projections (0-projection suppressed).
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Spin-Selective Hadron Spectroscopy via Azimuthal Anisotropies from Entanglement-Enabled Spin Interference." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/G7N46IDI
@misc{pith2026260616966,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Spin-Selective Hadron Spectroscopy via Azimuthal Anisotropies from Entanglement-Enabled Spin Interference},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/G7N46IDI}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.16966}
}
abstract
The $\pi^+\pi^-$ invariant mass spectrum above the $\rho^0(770)$ is rich with broad, overlapping resonances. Disentangling them, whether in photoproduction, ultra-peripheral heavy-ion collisions, or electroproduction, is a longstanding challenge for conventional partial-wave analysis. We show that the recently observed entanglement-enabled spin-interference effect in ultra-peripheral collisions provides a quantum-mechanical filter that resolves this ambiguity: the angular harmonics $A_n$ of the $\cos(n\Delta\phi)$ asymmetry, which are governed by selection rules in the spin of the interfering states. Specifically, overlap between two distinct spin-1 amplitudes leads to interference that populate $A_2$ alone, while overlap of a spin-1 amplitude with a spin-2 one generates $A_1$ and $A_3$. Utilizing ALICE data in the $1.0$--$1.4\,\mathrm{GeV} \; c^{-2}$ region, we demonstrate that two physically distinct hypotheses -- an additional spin-1 $\rho'(1450)$ (produced via photonuclear interactions) versus a spin-2 (photon-photon) $f_2(1270)$ state -- fit the invariant mass spectrum equally well but predict different $A_n$: identically zero $A_1$ and $A_3$ in the spin-1 case, versus pronounced peaks in the spin-2 case. This selection rule provides a new tool for hadronic spectroscopy in ultra-peripheral collisions and the first viable route to isolating the $\gamma\gamma\to\pi^+\pi^-$ continuum from the dominant photonuclear background, revealing a clean low-energy probe of non-perturbative QCD.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[32]
Coulomb nuclear interference effect in dipion production in ultraperipheral heavy ion collisions.Phys
Yoshikazu Hagiwara, Cheng Zhang, Jian Zhou, and Ya- jin Zhou. Coulomb nuclear interference effect in dipion production in ultraperipheral heavy ion collisions.Phys. Rev. D, 103:074013, Apr 2021
2021
-
[1]
A. J. Baltz et al. The Physics of Ultraperipheral Colli- sions at the LHC.Phys. Rept., 458:1–171, 2008
2008
-
[2]
Photonuclear and Two-photon Interactions at High-Energy Nuclear Collid- ers.Ann
Spencer Klein and Peter Steinberg. Photonuclear and Two-photon Interactions at High-Energy Nuclear Collid- ers.Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci., 70:323–354, 2020
2020
-
[3]
Klein, Zhangbu Xu, Shuai Yang, Wangmei Zha, and Jian Zhou
James Daniel Brandenburg, Spencer R. Klein, Zhangbu Xu, Shuai Yang, Wangmei Zha, and Jian Zhou. Prob- ing quantum phenomena through photoproduction in rel- ativistic heavy-ion collisions.Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., 143:104174, 2025
2025
-
[4]
Adam, et al
STAR Collaboration, J. Adam, et al. Measurement of e+e− momentum and angular distributions from linearly polarized photon collisions.Phys. Rev. Lett., 127:052302, Jul 2021
2021
-
[5]
Aaboud et al
M. Aaboud et al. Observation of centrality-dependent acoplanarity for muon pairs produced via two-photon scattering in Pb + Pb collisions at √sN N = 5.02 TeV with the atlas detector.Phys. Rev. Lett., 121:212301, Nov 2018
2018
-
[6]
Observation of light-by-light scatter- ing in ultraperipheral Pb+Pb collisions with the ATLAS detector.Phys
Georges Aad et al. Observation of light-by-light scatter- ing in ultraperipheral Pb+Pb collisions with the ATLAS detector.Phys. Rev. Lett., 123(5):052001, 2019
2019
-
[7]
Aad et al
G. Aad et al. Observation of theγγ→τ τprocess in Pb+ Pb collisions and constraints on theτ-lepton anomalous magnetic moment with the atlas detector.Phys. Rev. Lett., 131:151802, Oct 2023
2023
Show all 51 references
-
[8]
Sirunyan et al
A.M. Sirunyan et al. Evidence for light-by-light scatter- ing and searches for axion-like particles in ultraperiph- eral pbpb collisions at snn=5.02tev.Physics Letters B, 797:134826, 2019
2019
-
[9]
A. M. Sirunyan et al. Observation of forward neutron multiplicity dependence of dimuon acoplanarity in ultra- peripheral pb-pb collisions at √sN N = 5.02 TeV.Phys. Rev. Lett., 127:122001, Sep 2021
2021
-
[10]
L. J. Lanzerotti, R. B. Blumenthal, D. C. Ehn, W. L. Faissler, P. M. Joseph, F. M. Pipkin, J. K. Randolph, J. J. Russell, D. G. Stairs, and J. Tenenbaum. High- energy photoproduction of neutral rho mesons.Phys. Rev. Lett., 15:210–213, Aug 1965
1965
-
[11]
Bulos, W
F. Bulos, W. Busza, R. Giese, R. R. Larsen, D. W. G. S. Leith, B. Richter, V. Perez-Mendez, A. Stetz, S. H. Williams, M. Beniston, and J. Rettberg. Photoproduc- tion of rho mesons from complex nuclei at 9 bev.Phys. Rev. Lett., 22:490–494, Mar 1969
1969
-
[12]
Rev., 175:1669–1696, Nov 1968
Photoproduction of meson and baryon resonances at en- ergies up to 5.8 gev.Phys. Rev., 175:1669–1696, Nov 1968
1968
-
[13]
Derrick et al
M. Derrick et al. Measurement of elasticρ 0 photopro- duction at HERA.Z. Phys. C, 69:39–54, 1995
1995
-
[14]
Breitweg et al
J. Breitweg et al. Elastic and proton dissociativeρ 0 photoproduction at HERA.Eur. Phys. J. C, 2:247–267, 1998
1998
-
[15]
Aktas et al
A. Aktas et al. Diffractive photoproduction of rho mesons with large momentum transfer at HERA.Phys. Lett. B, 638:422–431, 2006
2006
-
[16]
Adler et al
C. Adler et al. Coherentρ 0 production in ultraperipheral heavy-ion collisions.Phys. Rev. Lett., 89:272302, Dec 2002
2002
-
[17]
Agakishiev et al.ρ 0 photoproduction in auau collisions at √sN N = 62.4 gev measured with the star detector
G. Agakishiev et al.ρ 0 photoproduction in auau collisions at √sN N = 62.4 gev measured with the star detector. Phys. Rev. C, 85:014910, Jan 2012
2012
-
[18]
Adamczyk et al
L. Adamczyk et al. Coherent diffractive photoproduc- tion ofρ 0mesons on gold nuclei at 200 GeV/nucleon-pair at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider.Phys. Rev. C, 96(5):054904, 2017
2017
-
[19]
Coherentρ 0 photoproduction in ultra-peripheral Pb-Pb collisions at √sNN = 2.76 TeV
Jaroslav Adam et al. Coherentρ 0 photoproduction in ultra-peripheral Pb-Pb collisions at √sNN = 2.76 TeV. JHEP, 09:095, 2015
2015
-
[20]
Measurement of exclusive ρ(770)0 photoproduction in ultraperipheral pPb colli- sions at √sNN = 5.02 TeV.Eur
Albert M Sirunyan et al. Measurement of exclusive ρ(770)0 photoproduction in ultraperipheral pPb colli- sions at √sNN = 5.02 TeV.Eur. Phys. J. C, 79(8):702, 2019
2019
-
[21]
Aaij, A.S.W
R. Aaij, A.S.W. Abdelmotteleb, et al. Coherent photo- production ofρ 0,ωand excited vector mesons in ultrape- ripheral PbPb collisions.J. High Energ. Phys., 2025:103, 2025. 6
2025
-
[22]
Boyer et al
J. Boyer et al. Two-photon production of pion pairs. Phys. Rev. D, 42:1350–1367, Sep 1990
1990
-
[23]
Mori et al
T. Mori et al. High Statistics Measurement of the Cross Sections ofγγ→π +π− Production.J. Phys. Soc. Jpn., 76(7):074102, 2007
2007
-
[24]
S. D. Drell. Pion parameters from high-energy inelastic interactions.Phys. Rev. Lett., 5:342–344, Oct 1960
1960
-
[25]
S¨ oding
P. S¨ oding. On the apparent shift of the rho meson mass in photoproduction.Physics Letters, 19(8):702–704, 1966
1966
-
[26]
Hammoud, R
N. Hammoud, R. Kami´ nski, V. Nazari, and G. Rupp. Strong evidence of theρ(1250) from a unitary multichan- nel reanalysis of elastic scattering data with crossing- symmetry constraints.Phys. Rev. D, 102(5):054029, 2020
2020
-
[27]
Tomography of ultrarelativistic nuclei with polarized photon-gluon collisions.Sci
Mohamed Abdallah et al. Tomography of ultrarelativistic nuclei with polarized photon-gluon collisions.Sci. Adv., 9(1):eabq3903, 2023
2023
-
[28]
Observation of Entanglement Enabled Spin-Interference in the Drell-S¨ oding Process in Au+Au Ultraperipheral Collisions at RHIC. 5 2026
2026
-
[29]
Entangle- ment enabled intensity interferometry in ultrarelativis- tic ultraperipheral nuclear collisions.Phys
James Daniel Brandenburg, Haowu Duan, Zhoudunming Tu, Raju Venugopalan, and Zhangbu Xu. Entangle- ment enabled intensity interferometry in ultrarelativis- tic ultraperipheral nuclear collisions.Phys. Rev. Res., 7(1):013131, 2025
2025
-
[30]
STAR Collaboration, B. E. Aboona, et al. Evidence of spin-interference effects in exclusivej/ψ→e +e− photo- production in ultraperipheral heavy-ion collisions.Phys. Rev. Lett., Apr 2026
2026
-
[31]
Measurement of the impact- parameter dependent azimuthal anisotropy in coherent ρ0 photoproduction in Pb–Pb collisions at sNN=5.02 TeV.Phys
Shreyasi Acharya et al. Measurement of the impact- parameter dependent azimuthal anisotropy in coherent ρ0 photoproduction in Pb–Pb collisions at sNN=5.02 TeV.Phys. Lett. B, 858:139017, 2024
2024
-
[33]
Mariaelena Boglione and M. R. Pennington. Determina- tion of radiative widths of scalar mesons from experimen- tal results on gamma gamma —>pi pi.Eur. Phys. J. C, 9:11–29, 1999
1999
-
[34]
Garcia-Martin, R
R. Garcia-Martin, R. Kaminski, J. R. Pelaez, J. Ruiz de Elvira, and F. J. Yndurain. The Pion-pion scattering am- plitude. IV: Improved analysis with once subtracted Roy- like equations up to 1100 MeV.Phys. Rev. D, 83:074004, 2011
2011
-
[35]
Report on progress in physics: ob- servation of the breit–wheeler process and vacuum bire- fringence in heavy-ion collisions.Reports on Progress in Physics, 86(8):083901, jun 2023
James Daniel Brandenburg, Janet Seger, Zhangbu Xu, and Wangmei Zha. Report on progress in physics: ob- servation of the breit–wheeler process and vacuum bire- fringence in heavy-ion collisions.Reports on Progress in Physics, 86(8):083901, jun 2023
2023
-
[36]
Budnev, I.F
V.M. Budnev, I.F. Ginzburg, G.V. Meledin, and V.G. Serbo. The two-photon particle production mechanism. physical problems. applications. equivalent photon ap- proximation.Physics Reports, 15(4):181–282, 1975
1975
-
[37]
Derrick et al
M. Derrick et al. Measurement of elasticϕphotoproduc- tion at hera.Physics Letters B, 377(4):259–272, 1996
1996
-
[38]
B. I. Abelev et al.ρ 0 photoproduction in ultraperipheral relativistic heavy ion collisions at √s�� = 200 gev.Phys. Rev. C, 77:034910, Mar 2008
2008
-
[39]
Centrality dependence of dilepton production viaγγprocesses from wigner distributions of photons in nuclei.Physics Letters B, 814:136114, 2021
Mariola K lusek-Gawenda, Wolfgang Sch¨ afer, and Antoni Szczurek. Centrality dependence of dilepton production viaγγprocesses from wigner distributions of photons in nuclei.Physics Letters B, 814:136114, 2021
2021
-
[40]
H. Xing, C. Zhang, J. Zhou, et al. The cos 2ϕazimuthal asymmetry inρ 0 meson production in ultraperipheral heavy ion collisions.J. High Energ. Phys., 2020:64, 2020
2020
-
[41]
Adamczyk et al
L. Adamczyk et al. Globalλhyperon polarization in nuclear collisions.Nature, 548(7665):62–65, August 2017
2017
-
[42]
Acharya, D
S. Acharya, D. Adamov´ a, et al. Coherent photoproduc- tion ofρ 0 vector mesons in ultra-peripheral Pb-Pb colli- sions at √sNN = 5.02 TeV.J. High Energ. Phys., 2020:35, 2020
2020
-
[43]
Abdul Khalek et al
R. Abdul Khalek et al. Science Requirements and Detec- tor Concepts for the Electron-Ion Collider: EIC Yellow Report.Nucl. Phys. A, 1026:122447, 2022
2022
-
[44]
Probing the gluon tomography in photopro- duction of dipion.Phys
Yoshikazu Hagiwara, Cheng Zhang, Jian Zhou, and Ya- jin Zhou. Probing the gluon tomography in photopro- duction of dipion.Phys. Rev. D, 104:094021, Nov 2021
2021
-
[45]
Photopro- duction ofπ + π− pairs in a model with tensor-pomeron and vector-odderon exchange.JHEP, 01:151, 2015
Arthur Bolz, Carlo Ewerz, Markos Maniatis, Otto Nacht- mann, Michel Sauter, and Andr´ e Sch¨ oning. Photopro- duction ofπ + π− pairs in a model with tensor-pomeron and vector-odderon exchange.JHEP, 01:151, 2015
2015
-
[46]
Azimuthal asymmetry inJ/ψ+γandJ/ψ+ J/ψproduction in ultraperipheral heavy-ion collisions at LHC
Yu Jia, Wen-Long Sang, Xiaonu Xiong, Jian Zhou, and Ya-jin Zhou. Azimuthal asymmetry inJ/ψ+γandJ/ψ+ J/ψproduction in ultraperipheral heavy-ion collisions at LHC. 12 2025
2025
-
[47]
Probing Quantum Numbers and Decay Branching Ratios of Exotic States via Entanglement-Enabled Spin Interference
Di Zhang, Zhangbu Xu, and Chi Yang. Probing Quantum Numbers and Decay Branching Ratios of Exotic States via Entanglement-Enabled Spin Interference. 6 2026
2026
-
[48]
Phillips, and Carlos Schat
Martin Hoferichter, Daniel R. Phillips, and Carlos Schat. Roy-Steiner equations for gamma gamma ->pi pi.Eur. Phys. J. C, 71:1743, 2011
2011
-
[49]
M. R. Pennington, T. Mori, S. Uehara, and Y. Watan- abe. Amplitude Analysis of High Statistics Results on gamma gamma —>pi+ pi- and the Two Photon Width of Isoscalar States.Eur. Phys. J. C, 56:1–16, 2008
2008
-
[50]
Pennington
Ling-Yun Dai and Michael R. Pennington. Comprehen- sive amplitude analysis ofγγ→π +π−, π0π0 and KK below 1.5 GeV.Phys. Rev. D, 90(3):036004, 2014
2014
-
[51]
Mariola Klusek-Gawenda and Antoni Szczurek.π +π− andπ 0π0 pair production in photon-photon and in ul- traperipheral ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions.Phys. Rev. C, 87(5):054908, 2013. 7 ��� ������ Fit Variations and Results—The parameters ex- tracted from the fits shown i...
2013
Reviewed July 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.