Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Physical Results from 2+1 Flavor Domain Wall QCD and SU(2) Chiral Perturbation Theory

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 0804.0473 v1 pith:QZLGYV7Z submitted 2008-04-03 hep-lat

classification hep-lat
keywords massesquarkperturbationstatsysttheorychiralfind
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We have simulated QCD using 2+1 flavors of domain wall quarks on a $(2.74 {\rm fm})^3$ volume with an inverse lattice scale of $a^{-1} = 1.729(28)$ GeV. The up and down (light) quarks are degenerate in our calculations and we have used four values for the ratio of light quark masses to the strange (heavy) quark mass in our simulations: 0.217, 0.350, 0.617 and 0.884. We have measured pseudoscalar meson masses and decay constants, the kaon bag parameter $B_K$ and vector meson couplings. We have used SU(2) chiral perturbation theory, which assumes only the up and down quark masses are small, and SU(3) chiral perturbation theory to extrapolate to the physical values for the light quark masses. While next-to-leading order formulae from both approaches fit our data for light quarks, we find the higher order corrections for SU(3) very large, making such fits unreliable. We also find that SU(3) does not fit our data when the quark masses are near the physical strange quark mass. Thus, we rely on SU(2) chiral perturbation theory for accurate results. We use the masses of the $\Omega$ baryon, and the $\pi$ and $K$ mesons to set the lattice scale and determine the quark masses. We then find $f_\pi = 124.1(3.6)_{\rm stat}(6.9)_{\rm syst} {\rm MeV}$, $f_K = 149.6(3.6)_{\rm stat}(6.3)_{\rm syst} {\rm MeV}$ and $f_K/f_\pi = 1.205(0.018)_{\rm stat}(0.062)_{\rm syst}$. Using non-perturbative renormalization to relate lattice regularized quark masses to RI-MOM masses, and perturbation theory to relate these to $\bar{\rm MS}$ we find $ m_{ud}^{\bar{\rm MS}}(2 {\rm GeV}) = 3.72(0.16)_{\rm stat}(0.33)_{\rm ren}(0.18)_{\rm syst} {\rm MeV}$ and $m_{s}^{\bar{\rm MS}}(2 {\rm GeV}) = 107.3(4.4)_{\rm stat}(9.7)_{\rm ren}(4.9)_{\rm syst} {\rm MeV}$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Neutron Electric Dipole Moment from Lattice QCD using a Background Electric Field

    hep-lat 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Using background electric fields, local topological charge, and non-Hermitian GEVP, lattice QCD yields dn = -0.0050(4)stat(8)sys θ-bar e fm at the physical point.

  2. Polarisation fractions in $B\to V_1 V_2$: U-Spin constraints and new physics signatures

    hep-ph 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A global U-spin fit finds a severe Standard-Model tension in the longitudinal polarisation of Bs→K*0K*0 once the naive-factorisation helicity hierarchy is imposed, and simple b→s new-physics operators only partially r...

  3. Precision calculations of $B\to K^*$ form factors from SCET sum rules beyond leading-power contributions

    hep-ph 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    New subleading-power corrections to B to K* form factors from SCET sum rules yield SM branching fractions BR(Bbar0 to Kbar*0 nu nubar)=8.09(96)e-6 and F_L=0.44(4).

  4. Form factors for semileptonic B(s) -> D*(s) l nu_l decays

    hep-lat 2024-12 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

    RBC/UKQCD presents preliminary, unrenormalized lattice form factors for B_s to D*_s semileptonic decay on a single ensemble, covering a q^2 range similar to published calculations.

Pith tools