Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Training a Binary Classifier with the Quantum Adiabatic Algorithm

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 0811.0416 v1 pith:CCJMVSMW submitted 2008-11-04 quant-ph

classification quant-ph
keywords binarytrainingquantumclassifierclassifierserrornumberproblem
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper describes how to make the problem of binary classification amenable to quantum computing. A formulation is employed in which the binary classifier is constructed as a thresholded linear superposition of a set of weak classifiers. The weights in the superposition are optimized in a learning process that strives to minimize the training error as well as the number of weak classifiers used. No efficient solution to this problem is known. To bring it into a format that allows the application of adiabatic quantum computing (AQC), we first show that the bit-precision with which the weights need to be represented only grows logarithmically with the ratio of the number of training examples to the number of weak classifiers. This allows to effectively formulate the training process as a binary optimization problem. Solving it with heuristic solvers such as tabu search, we find that the resulting classifier outperforms a widely used state-of-the-art method, AdaBoost, on a variety of benchmark problems. Moreover, we discovered the interesting fact that bit-constrained learning machines often exhibit lower generalization error rates. Changing the loss function that measures the training error from 0-1 loss to least squares maps the training to quadratic unconstrained binary optimization. This corresponds to the format required by D-Wave's implementation of AQC. Simulations with heuristic solvers again yield results better than those obtained with boosting approaches. Since the resulting quadratic binary program is NP-hard, additional gains can be expected from applying the actual quantum processor.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quantum adiabatic machine learning with zooming

    quant-ph 2019-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    QAML-Z, an iterative zooming and classifier-augmentation upgrade to QAML, improves Higgs classification AUROC over QAML and matches a deep neural network at small training set sizes, but a classical simulated-annealin...

  2. Quantum-Annealing Enhanced Machine Learning for Interpretable Phase Classification of High-Entropy Alloys

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2025-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Quantum annealing based QBoost and QSVM models classify six high-entropy alloy phases with accuracy comparable or superior to classical SVM in several cases, but with a flawed runtime benchmark and unresolved label in...

Pith tools