Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Statistical methods in cosmology

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 0911.3105 v1 pith:BDSMQENQ submitted 2009-11-16 astro-ph.CO

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords statisticalablecosmologistscosmologydatamodelparametersshould
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The advent of large data-set in cosmology has meant that in the past 10 or 20 years our knowledge and understanding of the Universe has changed not only quantitatively but also, and most importantly, qualitatively. Cosmologists rely on data where a host of useful information is enclosed, but is encoded in a non-trivial way. The challenges in extracting this information must be overcome to make the most of a large experimental effort. Even after having converged to a standard cosmological model (the LCDM model) we should keep in mind that this model is described by 10 or more physical parameters and if we want to study deviations from it, the number of parameters is even larger. Dealing with such a high dimensional parameter space and finding parameters constraints is a challenge on itself. Cosmologists want to be able to compare and combine different data sets both for testing for possible disagreements (which could indicate new physics) and for improving parameter determinations. Finally, cosmologists in many cases want to find out, before actually doing the experiment, how much one would be able to learn from it. For all these reasons, sophisiticated statistical techniques are being employed in cosmology, and it has become crucial to know some statistical background to understand recent literature in the field. I will introduce some statistical tools that any cosmologist should know about in order to be able to understand recently published results from the analysis of cosmological data sets. I will not present a complete and rigorous introduction to statistics as there are several good books which are reported in the references. The reader should refer to those.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Observational constraints on vector-like dark energy

    astro-ph.CO 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Pantheon and H(z) data force the cosmic triad vector dark energy model to sit very close to the LambdaCDM limit.

  2. Updated constraints on Regge-Teitelboim gravity

    astro-ph.CO 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Planck and low-redshift data constrain the Stern-Xu Regge-Teitelboim extra acceleration component to Ω_RT < 0.006 at 95% confidence, making the model observationally indistinguishable from ΛCDM.

Pith tools