REVIEW 1 cited by
$X(1835)$ and the New Resonances $X(2120)$ and $X(2370)$ Observed by the BES Collaboration
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We calculate the decay widths of both the second and the third radial excitations of $\eta$ and $\eta'$ within the framework of $^3P_0$ model. After comparing the theoretical decay widths and decay patterns with the available experimental data of $\eta(1760)$, $X(1835)$, $X(2120)$ and $X(2370)$, we find that the interpretation of $\eta(1760)$ and $X(1835)$ as the second radial excitation of $\eta$ and $\eta'$ crucially depends on the measured mass and width of $\eta(1760)$, which is still controversial experimentally. We suggest that there may be sizable $p\bar{p}$ content in $X(1835)$. $X(2120)$ and $X(2370)$ can not be understood as the third radial excitations of $\eta$ and $\eta'$, $X(2370)$ probably is a mixture of $\eta'(4{^1}{S}{_0})$ and glueball.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Investigate the glueball-like particle $X(2370)$ in $B$ meson decays
Predictions for B to X(2370) branching fractions, around 10^-6 semileptonic and 10^-8 nonleptonic, suggest the glueball candidate is within Belle-II's reach.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.