REVIEW 4 cited by
An exact slope for AdS/CFT
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We present a conjecture for the small spin limit of the minimal scaling dimension of Wilson operators in the sl(2) sector of the planar N=4 Super-Yang-Mills theory. The expression is given in closed form as a function of the 't Hooft coupling and twist of the operator. The formula should stand as a prediction of the Asymptotic Bethe Ansatz equations for the spectrum of scaling dimensions and evidence is given at both weak and strong coupling that it should be exact. In particular, agreement is found with established one-loop spectroscopy of string energies at strong coupling.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
On the $AdS_3$ Virasoro-Shapiro Amplitude
Tree-level four-tachyon amplitudes on AdS3 with NSNS flux expand around flat space into Virasoro-Shapiro integrals dressed with single-valued multiple polylogarithms, to all orders.
-
Chaos in the butterfly cone
The velocity-dependent Lyapunov exponent inside the butterfly cone satisfies λ(v) ≤ 2πT(1-|v|/v_B), a generalization of the chaos bound, saturated in SYK chains, holographic theories, and large N CFTs.
-
Regge Trajectories of N=4 SYM Part I: General Asymptotic Baxter-Bethe Ansatz
From the Quantum Spectral Curve, the authors derive the Asymptotic Baxter-Bethe Ansatz, which determines the asymptotic BFKL spectrum of Regge trajectories in N=4 SYM, reproduces known weak-coupling results, and suppo...
-
DGLAP and BFKL equations in $\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM: from weak to strong coupling
A review of known results on DGLAP and BFKL equations in N=4 SYM, from weak-coupling perturbation theory to strong coupling via AdS/CFT and integrability, with no new derivations.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.