Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Transverse-energy distributions at midrapidity in $p$$+$$p$, $d$$+$Au, and Au$+$Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{_{NN}}}=62.4$--200~GeV and implications for particle-production models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1312.6676 v1 pith:OSS6B4G2 submitted 2013-12-23 nucl-ex

S.S. Adler , S. Afanasiev , C. Aidala , N.N. Ajitanand , Y. Akiba , A. Al-Jamel , J. Alexander , K. Aoki
show 383 more authors
L. Aphecetche R. Armendariz S.H. Aronson R. Averbeck T.C. Awes B. Azmoun V. Babintsev A. Baldisseri K.N. Barish P.D. Barnes B. Bassalleck S. Bathe S. Batsouli V. Baublis F. Bauer A. Bazilevsky S. Belikov R. Bennett Y. Berdnikov M.T. Bjorndal J.G. Boissevain H. Borel K. Boyle M.L. Brooks D.S. Brown N. Bruner D. Bucher H. Buesching V. Bumazhnov G. Bunce J.M. Burward-Hoy S. Butsyk X. Camard S. Campbell J.-S. Chai P. Chand W.C. Chang S. Chernichenko C.Y. Chi J. Chiba M. Chiu I.J. Choi R.K. Choudhury T. Chujo V. Cianciolo C.R. Cleven Y. Cobigo B.A. Cole M.P. Comets P. Constantin M. Csanád T. Csörgő J.P. Cussonneau T. Dahms K. Das G. David F. Deák H. Delagrange A. Denisov D. d'Enterria A. Deshpande E.J. Desmond A. Devismes O. Dietzsch A. Dion J.L. Drachenberg O. Drapier A. Drees A.K. Dubey A. Durum D. Dutta V. Dzhordzhadze Y.V. Efremenko J. Egdemir A. Enokizono H. En'yo B. Espagnon S. Esumi D.E. Fields C. Finck F. Fleuret S.L. Fokin B. Forestier B.D. Fox Z. Fraenkel J.E. Frantz A. Franz A.D. Frawley Y. Fukao S.-Y. Fung S. Gadrat F. Gastineau M. Germain A. Glenn M. Gonin J. Gosset Y. Goto R. Granier de Cassagnac N. Grau S.V. Greene M. Grosse Perdekamp T. Gunji H.-{AA}. Gustafsson T. Hachiya A. Hadj Henni J.S. Haggerty M.N. Hagiwara H. Hamagaki A.G. Hansen H. Harada E.P. Hartouni K. Haruna M. Harvey E. Haslum K. Hasuko R. Hayano X. He M. Heffner T.K. Hemmick J.M. Heuser P. Hidas H. Hiejima J.C. Hill R. Hobbs M. Holmes W. Holzmann K. Homma B. Hong A. Hoover T. Horaguchi M.G. Hur T. Ichihara H. Iinuma V.V. Ikonnikov K. Imai M. Inaba M. Inuzuka D. Isenhower L. Isenhower M. Ishihara T. Isobe M. Issah A. Isupov B.V. Jacak J. Jia J. Jin O. Jinnouchi B.M. Johnson S.C. Johnson K.S. Joo D. Jouan F. Kajihara S. Kametani N. Kamihara M. Kaneta J.H. Kang K. Katou T. Kawabata T. Kawagishi A.V. Kazantsev S. Kelly B. Khachaturov A. Khanzadeev J. Kikuchi D.J. Kim E. Kim E.J. Kim G.-B. Kim H.J. Kim Y.-S. Kim E. Kinney Á. Kiss E. Kistenev A. Kiyomichi C. Klein-Boesing H. Kobayashi L. Kochenda V. Kochetkov R. Kohara B. Komkov M. Konno D. Kotchetkov A. Kozlov P.J. Kroon C.H. Kuberg G.J. Kunde N. Kurihara K. Kurita M.J. Kweon Y. Kwon G.S. Kyle R. Lacey J.G. Lajoie A. Lebedev Y. Le Bornec S. Leckey D.M. Lee M.K. Lee M.J. Leitch M.A.L. Leite X.H. Li H. Lim A. Litvinenko M.X. Liu C.F. Maguire Y.I. Makdisi A. Malakhov M.D. Malik V.I. Manko Y. Mao G. Martinez H. Masui F. Matathias T. Matsumoto M.C. McCain P.L. McGaughey Y. Miake T.E. Miller A. Milov S. Mioduszewski G.C. Mishra J.T. Mitchell A.K. Mohanty D.P. Morrison J.M. Moss T.V. Moukhanova D. Mukhopadhyay M. Muniruzzaman J. Murata S. Nagamiya Y. Nagata J.L. Nagle M. Naglis T. Nakamura J. Newby M. Nguyen B.E. Norman A.S. Nyanin J. Nystrand E. O'Brien C.A. Ogilvie H. Ohnishi I.D. Ojha K. Okada O.O. Omiwade A. Oskarsson I. Otterlund K. Oyama K. Ozawa D. Pal A.P.T. Palounek V. Pantuev V. Papavassiliou J. Park W.J. Park S.F. Pate H. Pei V. Penev J.-C. Peng H. Pereira V. Peresedov D.Yu. Peressounko A. Pierson C. Pinkenburg R.P. Pisani M.L. Purschke A.K. Purwar H. Qu J.M. Qualls J. Rak I. Ravinovich K.F. Read M. Reuter K. Reygers V. Riabov Y. Riabov G. Roche A. Romana M. Rosati S.S.E. Rosendahl P. Rosnet P. Rukoyatkin V.L. Rykov S.S. Ryu B. Sahlmueller N. Saito T. Sakaguchi S. Sakai V. Samsonov L. Sanfratello R. Santo H.D. Sato S. Sato S. Sawada Y. Schutz V. Semenov R. Seto D. Sharma T.K. Shea I. Shein T.-A. Shibata K. Shigaki M. Shimomura T. Shohjoh K. Shoji A. Sickles C.L. Silva D. Silvermyr K.S. Sim C.P. Singh V. Singh S. Skutnik W.C. Smith A. Soldatov R.A. Soltz W.E. Sondheim S.P. Sorensen I.V. Sourikova F. Staley P.W. Stankus E. Stenlund M. Stepanov A. Ster S.P. Stoll T. Sugitate C. Suire J.P. Sullivan J. Sziklai T. Tabaru S. Takagi E.M. Takagui A. Taketani K.H. Tanaka Y. Tanaka K. Tanida M.J. Tannenbaum A. Taranenko P. Tarján T.L. Thomas M. Togawa J. Tojo H. Torii R.S. Towell V-N. Tram I. Tserruya Y. Tsuchimoto S.K. Tuli H. Tydesjö N. Tyurin T.J. Uam C. Vale H. Valle H.W. van Hecke J. Velkovska M. Velkovsky R. Vértesi V. Veszprémi A.A. Vinogradov M.A. Volkov E. Vznuzdaev M. Wagner X.R. Wang Y. Watanabe J. Wessels S.N. White N. Willis D. Winter F.K. Wohn C.L. Woody M. Wysocki W. Xie A. Yanovich S. Yokkaichi G.R. Young I. Younus I.E. Yushmanov W.A. Zajc O. Zaudtke C. Zhang S. Zhou J. Zimányi L. Zolin X. Zong
This is my paper
classification nucl-ex
keywords distributionscollisionspartcollmodelnumbersqrtcalculated
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Measurements of the midrapidity transverse energy distribution, $d\Et/d\eta$, are presented for $p$$+$$p$, $d$$+$Au, and Au$+$Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{_{NN}}}=200$ GeV and additionally for Au$+$Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{_{NN}}}=62.4$ and 130 GeV. The $d\Et/d\eta$ distributions are first compared with the number of nucleon participants $N_{\rm part}$, number of binary collisions $N_{\rm coll}$, and number of constituent-quark participants $N_{qp}$ calculated from a Glauber model based on the nuclear geometry. For Au$+$Au, $\mean{d\Et/d\eta}/N_{\rm part}$ increases with $N_{\rm part}$, while $\mean{d\Et/d\eta}/N_{qp}$ is approximately constant for all three energies. This indicates that the two component ansatz, $dE_{T}/d\eta \propto (1-x) N_{\rm part}/2 + x N_{\rm coll}$, which has been used to represent $E_T$ distributions, is simply a proxy for $N_{qp}$, and that the $N_{\rm coll}$ term does not represent a hard-scattering component in $E_T$ distributions. The $dE_{T}/d\eta$ distributions of Au$+$Au and $d$$+$Au are then calculated from the measured $p$$+$$p$ $E_T$ distribution using two models that both reproduce the Au$+$Au data. However, while the number-of-constituent-quark-participant model agrees well with the $d$$+$Au data, the additive-quark model does not.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Longitudinal Dynamics of Large and Small Systems from a 3D Bayesian Calibration of RHIC Top-energy Collision Data

    nucl-ex 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 3D Bayesian calibration of RHIC Au-Au and d-Au data constrains the longitudinal initial state and QGP viscosity, and its posterior predicts p-Au and 3He-Au flow measurements.

  2. Saturation effects in exclusive vector meson production in DIS

    hep-ph 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A dense-limit CGC hotspot calculation shows saturation mildly suppresses exclusive vector meson cross sections in ep, with suppression growing at higher color-charge density.

  3. Study the Longitudinal Entropy Deposition using d+Au Collision

    nucl-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A 3D entropy deposition model with β≈0.35 and n_BC-dependent rapidity loss, plus ab initio deuteron sampling, reproduces d+Au dNch/dη, spectra, and vn and transfers to p+Au, 3He+Au, and Au+Au.

  4. Model Comparisons of Transverse Energy and Charged-Particle Multiplicity in A+A Collisions at Midrapidity from $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ $=$ 7.7 to 200~GeV

    nucl-ex 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A broad model-data comparison shows that PYTHIA, AMPT, HIJING, and SMASH all fail to reproduce PHENIX transverse energy and multiplicity at low beam energies and in peripheral collisions.

Pith tools