REVIEW 1 cited by
How the Quantum Sorites Phenomenon Strengthens Bell's Argument
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Recently, Colbeck and Renner (2011) [arXiv:1005.5173] published a theorem that appears to be stronger than the Bell (1964) theorem in a way that is more significant than the other variations of Bell's theorem that have been published in the 50 years since Bell's theorem. Colbeck and Renner themselves do not relate their theorem directly to Bell's theorem, so here I present a version of the Colbeck-Renner theorem that makes the relationship explicit.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
How the Quantum Sorites Phenomenon Strengthens the Bell Argument and How a Random-Matrix Collapse Dynamics Answers It
Chained spin correlations imply hidden variables must break Parameter Independence, and a random-matrix collapse model shows how that can happen while No-Signaling survives.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.