Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Raster scan or 2-D approach?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1404.7395 v1 pith:C7TXRXJP submitted 2014-04-29 hep-ex hep-ph

classification hep-exhep-ph
keywords approachrasterscanapproachesconsiderdifferentdimensionaldiscovery
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We consider the relative merits of two different approaches to discovery or exclusion of new phenomena, a raster scan or a 2-dimensional approach.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Feldman-Cousins' ML Cousin: Sterile Neutrino Global Fits using Simulation-Based Inference

    hep-ex 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A two-stage simulation-based inference method, using dropout neural networks and normalizing flows, produces fast approximate credibility regions for 3+1 sterile neutrino global fits.

Pith tools