REVIEW 2 cited by
Diagnosing lepton-nonuniversality in $b \to s \ell \ell$
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Ratios of branching fractions of semileptonic B decays, $(B \to H \mu \mu)$ over $(B \to H ee)$ with $H=K, K^*,X_s, K_0(1430), \phi, \ldots$ are sensitive probes of lepton universality. In the Standard Model, the underlying flavor changing neutral current process $b\rightarrow s \ell \ell$ is lepton flavor universal. However models with new flavor violating physics above the weak scale can give substantial non-universal contributions. The leading contributions from such new physics can be parametrized by effective dimension six operators involving left- or right-handed quarks. We show that in the double ratios $R_{X_s}/R_K$, $R_{K^*}/R_K$ and $R_\phi/R_K$ the dependence on new physics coupling to left-handed quarks cancels out. Thus a measurement of any of these double ratios is a clean probe of flavor nonuniversal physics coupling to right-handed quarks. We also point out that the observables $R_{X_s}$, $R_{K^*}$, $R_{K_0(1430)}$ and $R_\phi$ depend on the same combination of Wilson coefficients and therefore satisfy simple consistency relations.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
With or without U(2)? Probing non-standard flavor and helicity structures in semileptonic B decays
Under the minimally-broken U(2)_q × U(2)_ℓ flavor symmetry hypothesis, semileptonic B decay amplitudes are controlled by a few parameters, yielding testable correlations such as equal new-physics effects in b→u and b→...
-
Constraints on New Physics from $B$ mesons
A 2019 review of B meson and kaon physics anomalies, summarizing the evidence for lepton flavor universality violation and tensions in mixing and CP violation, and assessing new physics explanations.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.