REVIEW 2 cited by
Non-equilibrium scalar two point functions in AdS/CFT
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
In the first part of the paper, we discuss different versions of the AdS/CFT dictionary out of equilibrium. We show that the Skenderis - van Rees prescription and the "extrapolate" dictionary are equivalent at the level of "in-in" two point functions of free scalar fields in arbitrary asymptotically AdS spacetimes. In the second part of the paper, we calculate two point correlation functions in dynamical spacetimes using the "extrapolate" dictionary. These calculations are performed for conformally coupled scalar fields in examples of spacetimes undergoing gravitational collapse, the AdS$_2$-Vaidya spacetime and the AdS$_3$-Vaidya spacetime, which allow us to address the problem of thermalization following a quench in the boundary field theory. The computation of the correlators is formulated as an initial value problem in the bulk spacetime. Finally, we compare our results for AdS$_3$-Vaidya to results in the previous literature obtained using the geodesic approximation and we find qualitative agreement.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Superluminal chaos after a quantum quench
In BTZ-Vaidya holographic quenches, out-of-time-order correlators imply a transient superluminal butterfly velocity v_B = r_+/r_- > 1 while Lyapunov growth saturates the chaos bounds set by the local temperatures.
-
From Confinement to Chaos in AdS/CFT Correspondence via Non-equilibrium Local States
In holographic confining backgrounds, temporal peak statistics of boundary correlators after local quenches approach the Gaussian Symplectic Ensemble for heavy operators and, in capped BTZ, even for massless ones.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.