REVIEW 1 cited by
Vacuum stability bounds on Higgs coupling deviations
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We analyze the constraints imposed by Higgs vacuum stability on models with new fermions beyond the Standard Model. We focus on the phenomenology of Higgs couplings accessible at the Large Hadron Collider. New fermions that affect Higgs couplings lead to vacuum instability of the Higgs potential. Above the scale of vacuum instability, bosonic states must stabilize the potential, implying a cut-off to the pure fermion model. Conservatively tuning the models to produce the maximal cut-off for a given Higgs coupling effect, we show that observing a deviation in the $Htt$, $H$-diphoton, or $H$-digluon coupling, larger than 20$%$, would require that new bosons exist in order to stabilize the Higgs potential below about 100 TeV. For generic parameter configurations, and unless the new fermions are made as light as they can possibly be given current experimental constraints, observing a 10$%$ deviation in any of these couplings would suggest an instability cut-off below 10-100 TeV. Similarly, if new bosons are absent up to a high scale, then a deviation in the $Hbb$ or $H\tau\tau$ coupling, larger than about 20$%$, should be accompanied by a sizable deviation in the $Zbb$ or $Z\tau\tau$ couplings that can be conclusively tested with electroweak precision measurements at planned lepton colliders.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
The Two Scales of New Physics in Loop-Induced Higgs Couplings
A deviation in the loop-induced Higgs couplings hgg, hγγ, or hZγ caused solely by new vectorlike fermions implies an upper bound on the mass scale of new bosons needed to restore perturbativity and vacuum stability.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.