REVIEW 2 cited by
Comparing EFT and Exact One-Loop Analyses of Non-Degenerate Stops
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We develop a universal approach to the one-loop effective field theory (EFT) using the Covariant Derivative Expansion (CDE) method. We generalise previous results to include broader classes of UV models, showing how expressions previously obtained assuming degenerate heavy-particle masses can be extended to non-degenerate cases. We apply our method to the general MSSM with non-degenerate stop squarks, illustrating our approach with calculations of the coefficients of dimension-6 operators contributing to the $hgg$ and $h\gamma\gamma$ couplings, and comparing with exact calculations of one-loop Feynman diagrams. We then use present and projected future sensitivities to these operator coefficients to obtain present and possible future indirect constraints on stop masses. The current sensitivity is already comparable to that of direct LHC searches, and future FCC-ee measurements could be sensitive to stop masses above a TeV. The universality of our one-loop EFT approach facilitates extending these constraints to a broader class of UV models.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
SUSY meets SMEFT: Complete one-loop matching of the general MSSM
Complete one-loop matching of the general MSSM onto SMEFT in the Warsaw basis, including all SUSY-governed correlations among Wilson coefficients.
-
A Non-linear Representation of General Scalar Extensions of the Standard Model for HEFT Matching
The paper constructs a non-linear 'U representation' that separates Goldstone bosons from heavy scalars, enabling straightforward tree-level HEFT matching for general scalar extensions and giving explicit formulas for...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.