REVIEW 2 cited by
MiX: A Position Sensitive Dual-Phase Liquid Xenon Detector
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
The need for precise characterization of dual-phase xenon detectors has grown as the technology has matured into a state of high efficacy for rare event searches. The Michigan Xenon detector was constructed to study the microphysics of particle interactions in liquid xenon across a large energy range in an effort to probe aspects of radiation detection in liquid xenon. We report the design and performance of a small 3D position sensitive dual-phase liquid xenon time projection chamber with high light yield ($L_y^{122}=15.2 $pe/keV at zero field), long electron lifetime ($\tau > 200 \mu$s), and excellent energy resolution ($\sigma/E = 1\%$ for 1,333 keV gamma rays in a drift field of 200 V/cm). Liquid xenon time projection chambers with such high energy resolution may find applications not only in dark matter direct detection searches, but also in neutrinoless double beta decay experiments and other applications.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Measurement of the ionization yield from nuclear recoils in liquid xenon between 0.3 -- 6 keV with single-ionization-electron sensitivity
A liquid xenon TPC calibrated with fixed-angle neutron scattering reports nuclear-recoil ionization yields from 0.3 to 6 keV, finding a strong downward trend below 1 keV and a 10-15% rise with drift field.
-
Measurement of the scintillation and ionization response of liquid xenon at MeV energies in the EXO-200 experiment
EXO-200 measured the absolute ionization and scintillation yields of liquid xenon at 1.1-2.6 MeV, finding a W-value of 11.5 eV and a recombination-independent energy scale about 15% below the NEST simulation prediction.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.