REVIEW 1 cited by
Hamiltonian finite-temperature quantum field theory from its vacuum on partially compactified space
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
The partition function of a relativistic invariant quantum field theory is expressed by its vacuum energy calculated on a spatial manifold with one dimension compactified to a 1-sphere $S^1 (\beta)$, whose circumference $\beta$ represents the inverse temperature. Explicit expressions for the usual energy density and pressure in terms of the energy density on the partially compactified spatial manifold $\mathbb{R}^2 \times S^1 (\beta)$ are derived. To make the resulting expressions mathematically well-defined a Poisson resummation of the Matsubara sums as well as an analytic continuation in the chemical potential are required. The new approach to finite-temperature quantum field theories is advantageous in a Hamilton formulation since it does not require the usual thermal averages with the density operator. Instead, the whole finite-temperature behaviour is encoded in the vacuum wave functional on the spatial manifold $\mathbb{R}^2 \times S^1 (\beta)$. We illustrate this approach by calculating the pressure of a relativistic Bose and Fermi gas and reproduce the known results obtained from the usual grand canonical ensemble. As a first non-trivial application we calculate the pressure of Yang-Mills theory as function of the temperature in a quasi-particle approximation motivated by variational calculations in Coulomb gauge.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
To be, or not to be finite? The Higgs potential in Gauge-Higgs Unification
The Higgs effective potential in non-Abelian gauge-Higgs unification on M4 x S1 is finite at two loops, but in an M5 x S1 example it depends on a four-Fermi counterterm at three loops.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.