REVIEW 2 cited by
Parametrizations of the $\gamma^\ast N \to \Delta(1232)$ quadrupole form factors and Siegert's theorem
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
The large $N_c$ limit provides relations that can be used to calculate the $\gamma^\ast N \to \Delta(1232)$ quadrupole form factors at low and intermediate $Q^2$ under the assumption of the pion cloud dominance. There are two limitations in those parametrizations. First, the parametrization of the Coulomb quadrupole form factor underestimate the low $Q^2$ data. Second, when extrapolated for the timelike region, the form factors violate Siegert's theorem by terms of the order $1/N_c^2$. We propose here corrections to the parametrization of the electric quadrupole form factor, which violate Siegert's theorem only by terms of the order $1/N_c^4$. Combining the improved large $N_c$ pion cloud parametrizations with the valence quark contributions based on a covariant quark model for the quadrupole transition form factors, we obtain an extrapolation to the timelike region consistent with Siegert's theorem, and accomplish also a very good description of the data.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Low-$Q^2$ empirical parametrizations of the $N^\ast$ helicity amplitudes
Empirical helicity amplitude fits for nine nucleon and Delta resonances are modified near the pseudothreshold using a polynomial in the photon momentum matched at QP^2 = 0.1, 0.3, and 0.5 GeV^2.
-
Hyperon electromagnetic timelike elastic form factors at large $q^2$
Using a quark model calibrated in the spacelike region plus analyticity relations, the paper predicts timelike hyperon form factors that agree broadly with available data, with clear exceptions for Lambda and Xi-zero,...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.