REVIEW 4 cited by
How the Dark Energy Can Reconcile \textit{Planck} with Local Determination of the Hubble Constant
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We try to reconcile the tension between the local 2.4\% determination of Hubble constant and its global determination by $\textit{Planck}$ CMB data and BAO data through modeling the dark energy variously. We find that the chi-square is significantly reduced by $\Delta\chi^2_\text{all}=-6.76$ in the redshift-binned dark energy model where the $68\%$ limits of the equation of state of dark energy read $w(0\leq z\leq 0.1)=-1.958_{-0.508}^{+0.509}$, $w(0.1< z\leq 1.5)=-1.006_{-0.082}^{+0.092}$, and here $w(z>1.5)$ is fixed to $-1$.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Implicit Likelihood Inference and $z$-Binned Reconstruction of Dark Energy $w(z)$
Simulation-based inference with seven dark-energy bins yields w0 = -0.90 ± 0.05, a marginal ~2σ preference for w > -1 at low redshift, while all other constrained bins agree with ΛCDM.
-
Dark Neutrino interactions phase out the Hubble tension
Dark matter-neutrino interactions that block neutrino free streaming shift CMB acoustic peaks and reduce the Hubble tension from about 3.8σ to about 2.1σ in a fit to Planck and WiggleZ data.
-
Interacting dark energy in the early 2020s: a promising solution to the $H_0$ and cosmic shear tensions
An interacting dark energy model with coupling proportional to the dark energy density alleviates the H0 and S8 tensions in Planck 2018 data but is not preferred once BAO and supernova data are included.
-
In the Realm of the Hubble tension $-$ a Review of Solutions
A review summarizing the Hubble constant tension and proposed solutions from new physics that restore agreement between Planck CMB data and local H0 measurements within 1-2 sigma.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.