Pith. sign in

REVIEW 7 cited by

Speed of Gravitational Waves and the Fate of Scalar-Tensor Gravity

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1608.01982 v3 pith:YEXJ4KOX submitted 2016-08-05 gr-qc astro-ph.COhep-th

classification gr-qcastro-ph.COhep-th
keywords speedaccelerationanomalousbinaryconditionscosmiceventsgravitational
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

The direct detection of gravitational waves (GWs) is an invaluable new tool to probe gravity and the nature of cosmic acceleration. A large class of scalar-tensor theories predict that GWs propagate with velocity different than the speed of light, a difference that can be $\mathcal{O}(1)$ for many models of dark energy. We determine the conditions behind the anomalous GW speed, namely that the scalar field spontaneously breaks Lorentz invariance and couples to the metric perturbations via the Weyl tensor. If these conditions are realized in nature, the delay between GW and electromagnetic (EM) signals from distant events will run beyond human timescales, making it impossible to measure the speed of GWs using neutron star mergers or other violent events. We present a robust strategy to exclude or confirm an anomalous speed of GWs using eclipsing binary systems, whose EM phase can be exquisitely determined. he white dwarf binary J0651+2844 is a known example of such system that can be used to probe deviations in the GW speed as small as $c_g/c-1\gtrsim 2\cdot 10^{-12}$ when LISA comes online. This test will either eliminate many contender models for cosmic acceleration or wreck a fundamental pillar of general relativity.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 7 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. How deep can a cosmic void be? Voids-informed theoretical bounds in Galileon gravity

    astro-ph.CO 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Galileon models must obey a void-depth limit tied to expansion history to avoid force breakdowns, excluding ~60% of a linear parameterization's space by z less than or equal to 10.

  2. Testing Non-minimally Coupled BEC Dark Matter with Gravitational Waves

    gr-qc 2019-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Using the 1.7-second delay between GW170817 and its gamma-ray burst, the paper constrains non-minimally coupled BEC dark matter, finding ς ≳ 10⁻²⁵ eV for free oscillations and weaker bounds when oscillations are damped.

  3. hi_class: Background Evolution, Initial Conditions and Approximation Schemes

    astro-ph.CO 2019-09 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    hi_class now evolves the background from covariant Horndeski Lagrangians, provides consistent radiation-era initial conditions for scalar perturbations, and applies a quasi-static approximation automatically where it is safe.

  4. Cosmological searches for the neutrino mass scale and mass ordering

    astro-ph.CO 2019-07 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Thesis summarizing an upper limit of 0.12 eV on the neutrino mass sum, bias calibration via CMB lensing cross-correlations, and tighter limits plus stronger normal-ordering preference in non-phantom dynamical dark ene...

  5. Propagation of Gravitational Waves in Anisotropic Universe

    gr-qc 2019-08 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    In a toy anisotropic universe, gravitational waves acquire direction-dependent dispersion relations and anisotropy-dependent tidal acceleration, but the background equations contain a sign error that undermines the model.

  6. Cosmology Intertwined: A Review of the Particle Physics, Astrophysics, and Cosmology Associated with the Cosmological Tensions and Anomalies

    astro-ph.CO 2022-03 accept novelty 2.0 of 10

    The paper reviews cosmological tensions including the H0 and S8 discrepancies and explores new physics models that could explain them.

  7. Parametrizations for tests of gravity

    astro-ph.CO 2019-08 accept novelty 1.0 of 10

    A review of parametrized frameworks (PPF, EFT, PPN, ppE) for testing gravity across cosmological and astrophysical scales, with an outlook toward unification.

Pith tools