Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Bayesian analysis of CCDM Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1612.04077 v2 pith:3IGA4THZ submitted 2016-12-13 astro-ph.CO gr-qc

classification astro-ph.COgr-qc
keywords bayesiancreationmodelmodelsanalysisccdmcriteriondiscarded
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Creation of Cold Dark Matter (CCDM), in the context of Einstein Field Equations, leads to negative creation pressure, which can be used to explain the accelerated expansion of the Universe. In this work we tested six different spatially flat models for matter creation using statistical tools, at light of SN Ia data: Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) and Bayesian Evidence (BE). These approaches allow to compare models considering goodness of fit and number of free parameters, penalizing excess of complexity. We find that JO model is slightly favoured over LJO/$\Lambda$CDM model, however, neither of these, nor $\Gamma=3\alpha H_0$ model can be discarded from the current analysis. Three other scenarios are discarded either from poor fitting, either from excess of free parameters.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Can decaying vacuum solve the H_0 Tension?

    astro-ph.CO 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Two vacuum-decay models fitted to combined cosmological data give a positive decay rate at about six sigma and H0 near 71.6 km/s/Mpc, easing the Hubble tension.

Pith tools