Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A Complexity for Quantum Field Theory States and Application in Thermofield Double States

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1709.00921 v3 pith:3YQR3PAG submitted 2017-09-04 hep-th quant-ph

classification hep-thquant-ph
keywords complexitystatesfieldstatetheorycorrespondingdoubleholographic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

This paper defines a complexity between states in quantum field theory by introducing a Finsler structure based on ladder operators (the generalization of creation and annihilation operators). Two simple models are shown as examples to clarify the differences between complexity and other conceptions such as complexity of formation and entanglement entropy. When it is applied into thermofield double (TFD) states in $d$-dimensional conformal field theory, results show that the complexity density between them and corresponding vacuum states are finite and proportional to $T^{d-1}$, where $T$ is the temperature of TFD state. Especially, a proof is given to show that fidelity susceptibility of a TFD state is equivalent to the complexity between it and corresponding vacuum state, which gives an explanation why they may share the same object in holographic duality. Some enlightenments to holographic conjectures of complexity are also discussed.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Complexity measures in QFT and constrained geometric actions

    hep-th 2019-08 reject novelty 7.0 of 10

    The authors claim to rule out inhomogeneous complexity costs such as F_kappa and F_sigma^2 and to single out F_⟨H^2⟩ as the canonical complexity measure, but the no-go proof is incomplete.

  2. Reflections on Virasoro circuit complexity and Berry phase

    hep-th 2019-08 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A claimed identification of Virasoro circuit complexity with the Berry connection fails a basic consistency check for pure rotations.

Pith tools