REVIEW 3 cited by
$K_S^0-K_L^0$ Asymmetries and $CP$ Violation in Charmed Baryon Decays into Neutral Kaons
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
We study the $K^0_S-K^0_L$ asymmetries and $CP$ violations in charm-baryon decays with neutral kaons in the final state. The $K^0_S-K^0_L$ asymmetry can be used to search for two-body doubly Cabibbo-suppressed amplitudes of charm-baryon decays, with the one in $\Lambda^+_c\to pK^0_{S,L}$ as a promising observable. Besides, it is studied for a new $CP$-violation effect in these processes, induced by the interference between the Cabibbo-favored and doubly Cabibbo-suppressed amplitudes with the neutral kaon mixing. Once the new CP-violation effect is determined by experiments, the direct $CP$ asymmetry in neutral kaon modes can then be extracted and used to search for new physics. The numerical results based on $SU(3)$ symmetry will be tested by the experiments in the future.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Flavor SU(3) analysis of the charmless semileptonic $B \to PV\ell^+\nu_\ell$ decays
The paper predicts branching ratios of charmless B to PV l nu decays mediated by axial-vector, tensor, and excited vector resonances using SU(3) flavor symmetry, finding several modes at 10^-4 to 10^-3.
-
$CP$ asymmetries in the $\Lambda_c^+\to pK^0_S$ and $\Xi^+_c\to \Sigma^+K^0_S$ decays
The Xi_c+ to Sigma+ K0_S decay can show an interference-induced CP asymmetry up to about 10^-3, several times larger than in D meson decays.
-
CP violation studies at Super Tau-Charm Facility
A future Super Tau-Charm Facility is projected to test CP violation in hyperon, tau, and charm decays at 1e-4 to 1e-3 sensitivities and improve the kaon CPT mass-difference limit tenfold.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.