REVIEW 4 cited by
Higher-dimensional charged black holes cannot be over-charged by gedanken experiments
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We reconsider over-charging the higher-dimensional nearly extremal charged black holes using the new version of gedanken experiment proposed recently by Sorce and Wald. As a result, we find that cosmic censorship conjecture associated with such black holes is restored by taking into account the second-order correction, albeit violated by the first-order perturbation. Namely, the higher-dimensional nearly extremal charged black holes cannot be over-charged.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Trapped Surface as a Cosmic Censor
A trapped-surface criterion, derived under null convergence and generic conditions, rules out superextremal Reissner-Nordström, Kerr-Newman, and related final states in overcharging thought experiments without using a...
-
The First Law and Weak Cosmic Censorship for de Sitter Black Holes
An Iyer-Wald first law is established for general perturbations of Reissner-Nordstrom-de Sitter black holes, and a second-order Sorce-Wald argument shows that near-extremal such black holes cannot be overcharged under...
-
Thermodynamics and weak cosmic censorship conjecture with pressure in the rotating BTZ black holes
For charged rotating BTZ black holes, the paper reports that the weak cosmic censorship conjecture holds without pressure but can be violated in the extended phase space with pressure if the AdS radius is allowed to vary.
-
Six-dimensional Myers-Perry rotating black hole cannot be overspun
A six-dimensional rotating black hole with two spins cannot be overspun by test particle accretion, so weak cosmic censorship holds for this case.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.