Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Dimensional regularization vs methods in fixed dimension with and without $\gamma_5$

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1803.09764 v1 pith:BBX4QAGP submitted 2018-03-26 hep-ph hep-th

classification hep-phhep-th
keywords methodsregularizationdimensionalconsistentfixedgammaimplicitrenormalization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We study the Lorentz and Dirac algebra, including antisymmetric $\epsilon$ tensors and the $\gamma_5$ matrix, in implicit gauge-invariant regularization/renormalization methods defined in fixed integer dimensions. They include constrained differential, implicit and four-dimensional renormalization. We find that these fixed-dimension methods face the same difficulties as the different versions of dimensional regularization. We propose a consistent procedure in these methods, similar to the consistent version of regularization by dimensional reduction.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Gauge invariance and generalised $\eta$ regularisation

    hep-th 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An extended η-regularisation formalism unifies dimensional, denominator, and Schwinger-proper-time regularisation as solutions of gauge consistency conditions, and reproduces the chiral anomaly when implemented with t...

Pith tools