REVIEW 2 cited by
Analysis of $\Lambda_c(2595)$, $\Lambda_c(2625)$, $\Lambda_b(5912)$, $\Lambda_b(5920)$ based on a chiral partner structure
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We construct an effective hadronic model including $\Lambda_c(2595)$, $\Lambda_c(2625)$, $\Lambda_b(5912)$ and $\Lambda_b(5920)$ regarding them as chiral partners to $\Sigma_c(2455)$, $\Sigma_c(2520)$, $\Sigma_b$ and $\Sigma_b^\ast$, respectively, with respecting the chiral symmetry and heavy-quark spin-flavor symmetry. We determine the model parameters from the experimental data for relevant masses and decay widths of $\Sigma_c^{(\ast)}$ and $\Lambda_c(2595)$. Then, we study the decay widths of $\Lambda_c(2625)$, $\Lambda_b(5912)$ and $\Lambda_b(5920)$. We find that, although the decay of $\Lambda_c(2595)$ is dominated by the resonant contribution through $\Sigma_c(2455)$, non-resonant contributions are important for $\Lambda_c(2625)$, $\Lambda_b(5912)$ and $\Lambda_b(5920)$, which reflects the chiral partner structure. We also study the radiative decays of the baryons, and show that each of their widths is determined from the radiative decay width of their chiral partners.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Fate of $\Sigma_c$, $\Xi_c'$ and $\Omega_c$ baryons at high temperature with chiral restoration
At high temperature, parity partners of singly charmed baryons become degenerate, Sigma_c and Omega_c masses converge, and the Sigma_c to Lambda_c pi width closes.
-
Chiral effective theory of scalar and vector diquarks revisited
A new term in the chiral diquark Lagrangian is shown to control the mass ordering of pseudoscalar diquarks and to set the threshold at which heavy-baryon decays turn off under chiral restoration.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.